Ravi
Diamond Member
Is there a difference, and if so, what is it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there a difference, and if so, what is it?
It depends on the type of terrorism. Some terrorist acts are love crimes.
Well...there are crimes of passion.It depends on the type of terrorism. Some terrorist acts are love crimes.
It was sarcasm.
I don't understand the concept of a "hate crime". The way I see it, any crime that has a victim has an element of hate to it. Otherwise, we would have "love crimes" in addition to "hate crimes".
Well...there are crimes of passion.
It was sarcasm.
I don't understand the concept of a "hate crime". The way I see it, any crime that has a victim has an element of hate to it. Otherwise, we would have "love crimes" in addition to "hate crimes".
IMO, there is no difference between a hate crime and an act of terrorism...both are designed to terrorize a group. It always mystifies me that many will be okay with bringing terrorist charges against someone but hesitant about bringing hate crime charges against someone.
I was hoping someone could explain the difference.
Well...there are crimes of passion.
It was sarcasm.
I don't understand the concept of a "hate crime". The way I see it, any crime that has a victim has an element of hate to it. Otherwise, we would have "love crimes" in addition to "hate crimes".
IMO, there is no difference between a hate crime and an act of terrorism...both are designed to terrorize a group. It always mystifies me that many will be okay with bringing terrorist charges against someone but hesitant about bringing hate crime charges against someone.
I was hoping someone could explain the difference.
For the record, charges of hate crimes must be proved...i.e. there must be concrete evidence that the crime was committed because of some underlying "anti" factor.Well...there are crimes of passion.It was sarcasm.
I don't understand the concept of a "hate crime". The way I see it, any crime that has a victim has an element of hate to it. Otherwise, we would have "love crimes" in addition to "hate crimes".
IMO, there is no difference between a hate crime and an act of terrorism...both are designed to terrorize a group. It always mystifies me that many will be okay with bringing terrorist charges against someone but hesitant about bringing hate crime charges against someone.
I was hoping someone could explain the difference.
This probably wherein your confusion lies.
Definitions of Terrorism -- International and Domestic Bodies' Definitions of Terrorism
However the definition of Hate Crime:
Which IMHO is stupid unless the investigator is a mind reader.
hate crime - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
For the record, charges of hate crimes must be proved...i.e. there must be concrete evidence that the crime was committed because of some underlying "anti" factor.
Your link on terrorism gives, and admits to not giving, a definite definition of terrorism.
To the poster above you, military bodies can commit acts of terrorism but so can non-military bodies.
I'm not sure. If you leave notes around saying you're going to kill all ******* and then you bomb some black churches is that a thought crime?For the record, charges of hate crimes must be proved...i.e. there must be concrete evidence that the crime was committed because of some underlying "anti" factor.
Your link on terrorism gives, and admits to not giving, a definite definition of terrorism.
To the poster above you, military bodies can commit acts of terrorism but so can non-military bodies.
Does that mean it is a "thought crime"?
As in somebody being charged with a crime because of what they were thinking?
I'm not sure. If you leave notes around saying you're going to kill all ******* and then you bomb some black churches is that a thought crime?For the record, charges of hate crimes must be proved...i.e. there must be concrete evidence that the crime was committed because of some underlying "anti" factor.
Your link on terrorism gives, and admits to not giving, a definite definition of terrorism.
To the poster above you, military bodies can commit acts of terrorism but so can non-military bodies.
Does that mean it is a "thought crime"?
As in somebody being charged with a crime because of what they were thinking?
If so, how does that differ from terrorism?
No, but you aren't even making an effort to answer the questions I posed.I'm not sure. If you leave notes around saying you're going to kill all ******* and then you bomb some black churches is that a thought crime?Does that mean it is a "thought crime"?
As in somebody being charged with a crime because of what they were thinking?
If so, how does that differ from terrorism?
Bombing the churches is a crime. Would the church some how be 'less bombed' if it was a random church bombing?
a crime is a crime to say similar crimes differ in seriousness because what the perp was thinking is fucking ridiculous.
No, but you aren't even making an effort to answer the questions I posed.I'm not sure. If you leave notes around saying you're going to kill all ******* and then you bomb some black churches is that a thought crime?
If so, how does that differ from terrorism?
Bombing the churches is a crime. Would the church some how be 'less bombed' if it was a random church bombing?