August West
Platinum Member
- Sep 5, 2014
- 13,777
- 5,550
- 400
I have a MAGA acquaintance that believes Derek Chauvin is getting out of jail because of George Floyd`s criminal record. This ignoramus was allowed to teach high school for 30 years. I hope his former students are suing the school district for reparations.This case especially is a good example of learn what the laws actually say. Most of the objections to the McMichaels conviction are based in a few categories.
1) Racism. Blacks are scary and dangerous and we have to allow whatever actions the white person uses because they are scary.
That reason is so stupid it doesn’t even deserve consideration.
2) Self Defense. This almost always accompanies the Racist argument above. It is also a stupid argument. We don’t let the armed robber or other criminal claim self defense. We as a society long ago passed laws preventing the claim of self defense while committing crimes.
3) Arbury was a criminal. He didn’t commit any crimes that day. And even if he had, the McMichaels were not permitted under Georgia law to take any action. Georgia long ago, like the 1970’s decided only the victim of the crime had legal authority to engage in citizens arrest. No one else had the authority to do so.
4) Overcharged. This argument is that the McMichaels might have committed manslaughter or Murder in the Second Degree. But not really the kind of Murder that should result in a mandatory Life sentence.
Georgia only has Murder. As explained in the reply on page one. We don’t have in the degree. We have Murder. And if convicted of Murder your only sentence is Life, or Death. The option for the sentence is with or without the possibility of parole. In Georgia you aren’t eligible to be considered for Parole for 30 years. Minimum. That is considered, not guaranteed by a long shot.
4) Arbury had a criminal record.
This one argues that because Arbury committed crimes in the past, not on the day, that force was justified. In the 1970’s Rapists got off convincing the Jury that the woman was asking for it. She regularly slept around and it couldn’t be rape. States changed the laws to exclude the history of the victim from possible defenses. What was happening at the time became the only important question.
The need to learn the laws is now obvious. The laws don’t say what you want them to, or what you think they should. They say what they say. And you will be held to answer based upon those laws.