I wouldn’t put it past some in the US for supporting such a leak. Remember, we funded the Wuhan lab. We had contacts and influence there. I know you tend to believe that the government, particularly Democrats, are there to help you, but the reality is they just want to be elected, at all costs. COVID was a God send to Democratic policitians who had done everything to get rid of Trump, including 2 shame impeachments. He was going to win in 2020 pre-COVID. It was a slam dunk. I am not saying this happened, I am just saying that you shouldn’t put anything past a greedy politician.
Trump was impeached for crimes and abuses of his office. Your side impeached Clinton over a blow job, you really don't get to complain when he was impeached for shaking down a foreign government or inciting a coup.
Also, Biden was leading Trump in all the polls long before Covid hit.
Covid could have been a big boon for Trump, if he had acted presidential. Shit, 9/11 turned Bush into a hero.
Also, we didn't fund the Wuhan Lab. NAIAD did research through a subcontractor who in turn farmed some work out to the Wuhan Lab (you know, just like everyone else farms out some part of their work to China.)
The problem is that people have different definitions of what is truly awful. I don’t believe putting out information that COVID could have been developed in a lab qualifies, you do. I don’t believe reporting the facts about Hunter’s laptop qualifies, you do. If social media wants to moderate their content, then they lose 203 protection. One thing for sure is that the government should not be bullying them into what content is ”awful” and what isn’t.
I have no problem modifying 203 protections to allow better moderation.
Incidently, I've had posts pulled from Facebook. One time, for using the word "Tranny" to describe a character on
Doctor Who. (I probably should have said "Transgender") Another time, because I reposted incorrect information about Kyle Rittenhouse's criminal record. (It turns out there was another Kyle Rittenhouse in IL who had an extensive criminal record, and that got posted around for about a week until they realized it was a different guy.)
It is real. I has been verified many times. The data on the laptop matched the data Apple cloud provided the FBI. Again, you are just being intentionally obtuse to protect the low-lifes that you vote for.
But that doesn't mean ANYTHING. You can copy data. You can also plant data on a cloud account.
Things being spread around about the laptop fall into three categories.
1) Legitimate stuff that was on his account, most of which is not really incriminating.
2) Stuff that was added by third party actors (ie. Russians)
3) Stuff that was never on the laptop, but is being shopped around like it was.
This is why after five years of investigating, all they've been able to prove is that Hunter didn't get his taxes right.