Terri Schiavo's Husband: Jeb Bush 'Put Me Through Hell'

Who?
WHo the **** cares?
The only--ONLY--reason you give a shit is because with Mitt out Jeb looks like the RINO choice, so you have to dig up some shit about some woman from 20 years ago that no one, including you, really give a **** about. Using other people's tragedies for your advatnage. Yup, you're a lib.
**********.

Actually, I do give a ****. The Terri Schiavo case was a royal clusterfuck by GOP NaziCons. It was disgusting!

I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
By this time, while still legally married to Terri Schiavo, Michael Schiavo was in a relationship with Jodi Centonze, and had fathered their first child. He said he chose not to divorce his wife and relinquish guardianship because he wanted to ensure her final wishes (not to be kept alive in a PVS) were carried out.

Classy guy, not to mention if he divorced her he lost all of the money involved.


Yeah, weird wouldn't the parents then get the money? NOT like he was trying to do what was right, according to what she told him, and the court agreed, she didn't want to be kept alive like that!!
 
Who?
WHo the **** cares?
The only--ONLY--reason you give a shit is because with Mitt out Jeb looks like the RINO choice, so you have to dig up some shit about some woman from 20 years ago that no one, including you, really give a **** about. Using other people's tragedies for your advatnage. Yup, you're a lib.
**********.

Actually, I do give a ****. The Terri Schiavo case was a royal clusterfuck by GOP NaziCons. It was disgusting!

I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Except she didn't say that. We have only the word of the murderers brother who claims he had that conversation with her. I'm sure with all the money Michael made off of his dead wife, he took good care of his lying brother, Scott.

Actually, I do give a ****. The Terri Schiavo case was a royal clusterfuck by GOP NaziCons. It was disgusting!

I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
By this time, while still legally married to Terri Schiavo, Michael Schiavo was in a relationship with Jodi Centonze, and had fathered their first child. He said he chose not to divorce his wife and relinquish guardianship because he wanted to ensure her final wishes (not to be kept alive in a PVS) were carried out.

Classy guy, not to mention if he divorced her he lost all of the money involved.


Yeah, weird wouldn't the parents then get the money? NOT like he was trying to do what was right, according to what she told him, and the court agreed, she didn't want to be kept alive like that!!
Thanks for Agreeing it was all about the money
 
Who?
WHo the **** cares?
The only--ONLY--reason you give a shit is because with Mitt out Jeb looks like the RINO choice, so you have to dig up some shit about some woman from 20 years ago that no one, including you, really give a **** about. Using other people's tragedies for your advatnage. Yup, you're a lib.
**********.

Actually, I do give a ****. The Terri Schiavo case was a royal clusterfuck by GOP NaziCons. It was disgusting!

I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Wouldn't doubt if you just edited that part

Sorry, I'm NOT a conservative

See what the judge said abut it, according to 3 witness's at least


http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1...rter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf
 
Actually, I do give a ****. The Terri Schiavo case was a royal clusterfuck by GOP NaziCons. It was disgusting!

I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Except she didn't say that. We have only the word of the murderers brother who claims he had that conversation with her. I'm sure with all the money Michael made off of his dead wife, he took good care of his lying brother, Scott.

IF caught in a lie, what credence should ANYTHING else you posit be given???

"Judge Greer determined that testimony from the 3 witnesses recalling Mrs. Schiavo’s prior oral declarations that “she would not want to live like that” satisfied the
clear-and-convincing evidence standard (12). Accordingly, the court ordered that the PEG tube be removed"

http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf

One of them was her murderer, the second her murderer's brother....and who was the third?
 
Actually, I do give a ****. The Terri Schiavo case was a royal clusterfuck by GOP NaziCons. It was disgusting!

I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Wouldn't doubt if you just edited that part

Sorry, I'm NOT a conservative

See what the judge said abut it, according to 3 witness's at least


http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf
Lmao, I am not clicking on your bullshit links, this is not 100 year old history were talking about
 
Man awakens after 12 years in vegetative state says he was aware of everything 8217 WGN-TV
and did you see this? She was also in a vegetative state.

Who?
WHo the **** cares?
The only--ONLY--reason you give a shit is because with Mitt out Jeb looks like the RINO choice, so you have to dig up some shit about some woman from 20 years ago that no one, including you, really give a **** about. Using other people's tragedies for your advatnage. Yup, you're a lib.
**********.

Actually, I do give a ****. The Terri Schiavo case was a royal clusterfuck by GOP NaziCons. It was disgusting!

I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

Did you see her brain scans?

Right wingers don't understand the difference with zero brain activity versus coma? He was NEVER diagnosed with PVS BUT locked in syndrome...

AND TERRI WISHED NOT TO BE KEPT ALIVE IN SUCH A STATE!

Locked-in syndrome - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Stating something as fact that has never been proven as fact doesn't make it a fact. Even judges, who you Leftists worship like the gods on Mt. Olympus, can't turn their opinions into facts.

Oh, and not that it matters, but I'm a dad to four.
 
I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Except she didn't say that. We have only the word of the murderers brother who claims he had that conversation with her. I'm sure with all the money Michael made off of his dead wife, he took good care of his lying brother, Scott.

IF caught in a lie, what credence should ANYTHING else you posit be given???

"Judge Greer determined that testimony from the 3 witnesses recalling Mrs. Schiavo’s prior oral declarations that “she would not want to live like that” satisfied the
clear-and-convincing evidence standard (12). Accordingly, the court ordered that the PEG tube be removed"

http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf

One of them was her murderer, the second her murderer's brother....and who was the third?


ASK THE FUKKING COURT YOU PSYCHOTIC!!!
 
I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Wouldn't doubt if you just edited that part

Sorry, I'm NOT a conservative

See what the judge said abut it, according to 3 witness's at least


http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf
Lmao, I am not clicking on your bullshit links, this is not 100 year old history were talking about

Got it, you'll stick with ad homs


AdHominemAttackChristianLutheranLCMSDebateDoctrineCreedFalseTeachingConfessionsBible_zps125c74fb.jpg
 
Justification for murder that's all the left has.

Murder = pro choice

Murder = a vegetable state

Wonder what else new they will come up to justify murder, while opposing the death penalty?
 
No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Except she didn't say that. We have only the word of the murderers brother who claims he had that conversation with her. I'm sure with all the money Michael made off of his dead wife, he took good care of his lying brother, Scott.

IF caught in a lie, what credence should ANYTHING else you posit be given???

"Judge Greer determined that testimony from the 3 witnesses recalling Mrs. Schiavo’s prior oral declarations that “she would not want to live like that” satisfied the
clear-and-convincing evidence standard (12). Accordingly, the court ordered that the PEG tube be removed"

http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf

One of them was her murderer, the second her murderer's brother....and who was the third?


ASK THE FUKKING COURT YOU PSYCHOTIC!!!

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Wouldn't doubt if you just edited that part

Sorry, I'm NOT a conservative

See what the judge said abut it, according to 3 witness's at least


http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf
Lmao, I am not clicking on your bullshit links, this is not 100 year old history were talking about

Got it, you'll stick with ad homs


AdHominemAttackChristianLutheranLCMSDebateDoctrineCreedFalseTeachingConfessionsBible_zps125c74fb.jpg
Now, now sweety don't get upset
 
No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Except she didn't say that. We have only the word of the murderers brother who claims he had that conversation with her. I'm sure with all the money Michael made off of his dead wife, he took good care of his lying brother, Scott.

IF caught in a lie, what credence should ANYTHING else you posit be given???

"Judge Greer determined that testimony from the 3 witnesses recalling Mrs. Schiavo’s prior oral declarations that “she would not want to live like that” satisfied the
clear-and-convincing evidence standard (12). Accordingly, the court ordered that the PEG tube be removed"

http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf

One of them was her murderer, the second her murderer's brother....and who was the third?


ASK THE FUKKING COURT YOU PSYCHOTIC!!!

Oh great, someone screaming out in all caps calling others psychotic. :cuckoo:
 
No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Except she didn't say that. We have only the word of the murderers brother who claims he had that conversation with her. I'm sure with all the money Michael made off of his dead wife, he took good care of his lying brother, Scott.

IF caught in a lie, what credence should ANYTHING else you posit be given???

"Judge Greer determined that testimony from the 3 witnesses recalling Mrs. Schiavo’s prior oral declarations that “she would not want to live like that” satisfied the
clear-and-convincing evidence standard (12). Accordingly, the court ordered that the PEG tube be removed"

http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf

One of them was her murderer, the second her murderer's brother....and who was the third?


ASK THE FUKKING COURT YOU PSYCHOTIC!!!

Getting angry, are we? Or just desperate? I know what the court ruled, but courts aren't truth, they're opinion. So let's go back. Two of the witnesses have a motive to lie about Terri Schindler saying she would want to die if in a PVS, I'm just wondering if there were ANY witnesses that didn't have a motive to lie. If the judge took the word of people who had motive to lie, then it was a terrible decision. But judges are only human, not the gods you Leftwats make them out to be.
 
"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Except she didn't say that. We have only the word of the murderers brother who claims he had that conversation with her. I'm sure with all the money Michael made off of his dead wife, he took good care of his lying brother, Scott.

IF caught in a lie, what credence should ANYTHING else you posit be given???

"Judge Greer determined that testimony from the 3 witnesses recalling Mrs. Schiavo’s prior oral declarations that “she would not want to live like that” satisfied the
clear-and-convincing evidence standard (12). Accordingly, the court ordered that the PEG tube be removed"

http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf

One of them was her murderer, the second her murderer's brother....and who was the third?


ASK THE FUKKING COURT YOU PSYCHOTIC!!!

Oh great, someone screaming out in all caps calling others psychotic. :cuckoo:
Yup, it's hilarious
 
I think this is terrible. If her parents wanted to take care of her, why would they not be allowed to do so?

Because Michael wouldn't let them. He wouldn't divorce her and wouldn't give up custody and oddly it was for the same reason that the Schindlers wanted to keep her alive....because she might wake up and reveal the truth about what happened to her. It's why Michael wanted to murder her and her family wanted her protected.

But it's to no avail. Terri Schindler will testify before the Almighty before whom we all must stand in judgment and we will know the truth, and her murdering husband will be forever condemned. Nothing stays hidden forever.
 
"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Except she didn't say that. We have only the word of the murderers brother who claims he had that conversation with her. I'm sure with all the money Michael made off of his dead wife, he took good care of his lying brother, Scott.

IF caught in a lie, what credence should ANYTHING else you posit be given???

"Judge Greer determined that testimony from the 3 witnesses recalling Mrs. Schiavo’s prior oral declarations that “she would not want to live like that” satisfied the
clear-and-convincing evidence standard (12). Accordingly, the court ordered that the PEG tube be removed"

http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf

One of them was her murderer, the second her murderer's brother....and who was the third?


ASK THE FUKKING COURT YOU PSYCHOTIC!!!

Getting angry, are we? Or just desperate? I know what the court ruled, but courts aren't truth, they're opinion. So let's go back. Two of the witnesses have a motive to lie about Terri Schindler saying she would want to die if in a PVS, I'm just wondering if there were ANY witnesses that didn't have a motive to lie. If the judge took the word of people who had motive to lie, then it was a terrible decision. But judges are only human, not the gods you Leftwats make them out to be.

Did she have a living will?
 
15th post
I think this is terrible. If her parents wanted to take care of her, why would they not be allowed to do so?
I never understood that either, one wanted her to live one wanted her to die.
 
I think this is terrible. If her parents wanted to take care of her, why would they not be allowed to do so?

Because Michael wouldn't let them. He wouldn't divorce her and wouldn't give up custody and oddly it was for the same reason that the Schindlers wanted to keep her alive....because she might wake up and reveal the truth about what happened to her. It's why Michael wanted to murder her and her family wanted her protected.

But it's to no avail. Terri Schindler will testify before the Almighty before whom we all must stand in judgment and we will know the truth, and her murdering husband will be forever condemned. Nothing stays hidden forever.

I don't know about any of that, but he seems like a pretty selfish and horrible man. Did he not care about her parents' feelings at all?
 
Actually, I do give a ****. The Terri Schiavo case was a royal clusterfuck by GOP NaziCons. It was disgusting!

I didn't follow that case. I think it was Republicans wanted to kill her and Democrats didn't want to kill her. Did I get that right? Killing her would absolutely disgust me

No the other way around.
The Dems won and they let her starve to death.

"Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state and that she had made reliable oral declarations that she would have wanted the feeding tube removed"

Terri Schiavo case - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
By this time, while still legally married to Terri Schiavo, Michael Schiavo was in a relationship with Jodi Centonze, and had fathered their first child. He said he chose not to divorce his wife and relinquish guardianship because he wanted to ensure her final wishes (not to be kept alive in a PVS) were carried out.

Classy guy, not to mention if he divorced her he lost all of the money involved.


Yeah, weird wouldn't the parents then get the money? NOT like he was trying to do what was right, according to what she told him, and the court agreed, she didn't want to be kept alive like that!!
You mean the parents that were trying to use the money to keep her alive when their piece of shit son in law had a new girl and kid to take care of? I'm sure Terri was all for being starved to death for his cause.
 
Except she didn't say that. We have only the word of the murderers brother who claims he had that conversation with her. I'm sure with all the money Michael made off of his dead wife, he took good care of his lying brother, Scott.

IF caught in a lie, what credence should ANYTHING else you posit be given???

"Judge Greer determined that testimony from the 3 witnesses recalling Mrs. Schiavo’s prior oral declarations that “she would not want to live like that” satisfied the
clear-and-convincing evidence standard (12). Accordingly, the court ordered that the PEG tube be removed"

http://science.kennesaw.edu/~echen1/Bioethics/Readings and slides for Quarter 1/Quarter 1 readings/Terri Schiavo-Perry et al.pdf

One of them was her murderer, the second her murderer's brother....and who was the third?


ASK THE FUKKING COURT YOU PSYCHOTIC!!!

Getting angry, are we? Or just desperate? I know what the court ruled, but courts aren't truth, they're opinion. So let's go back. Two of the witnesses have a motive to lie about Terri Schindler saying she would want to die if in a PVS, I'm just wondering if there were ANY witnesses that didn't have a motive to lie. If the judge took the word of people who had motive to lie, then it was a terrible decision. But judges are only human, not the gods you Leftwats make them out to be.

Did she have a living will?

She's actually a poster child for why EVERYONE should have a living will. She didn't, which is why the case was so difficult. The only people who said she told them she would want to die if in a PVS have motive to lie about it. Most likely, like most everyone, Terri never expressed a desire one way or the other, not wanting to dwell on such a morbid subject. That's the way most people are, never thinking about worst case scenarios until they happen.
 
Back
Top Bottom