Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I knew you'd say that!When I come here and read debates, this is about 90% of what i see:
Greatest Come Back Ever - YouTube
Fuckin' LMAO!
So, where are these hijackers?
You really think that not one of 'em would come out and make big bucks doing the media circuit in the US, with such explosive info.
You've proven nothing.
Try again.
Christ, you people are friggin' gullible.
You machine seems to be stuck on the spin cycle.
You are debunking my statements. Once you debunk someone than it is up to you to PROVE them wrong or you are like a fart in the wind.
So if we disagree with you, then you are automatically right? I don't think so.......
I was asked to show my evidence of these guys being still alive. I provided that to y'all.
If you are not happy with the evidence I have supplied than prove the evidence is wrong.
If you can't do that than you are and he is exactly who I think you are, and this conversation will never go anywhere.
Both of you say that you have watched zeitgeist and Loose Change, however you asked me to show the pictures that the FBI provided.
The photo's are fully shown in Loose change so you are lying about ever watching the film.
So, you don't even look at the evidence yet debunk it.
One word for guys that do that. SHILLS!
Selling out your country for few damn dollars.
So, where are those hijackers, slapdick?Fuckin' LMAO!
So, where are these hijackers?
You really think that not one of 'em would come out and make big bucks doing the media circuit in the US, with such explosive info.
You've proven nothing.
Try again.
Christ, you people are friggin' gullible.
as usual,pathetic rebuttals when you have NONE.just because you are in denial and afraid of the truth doesnt mean we are gullible.
it doesn't even matter to Ollie that much of the "factoids" in this film are in contradiction with the official reports
it doesn't even matter to Ollie that much of the "factoids" in this film are in contradiction with the official reports
Yeah, pay a guy and he'll say anything.
Don't have too....Just go to all the conpiracy threads and you'll see all the examples you need.Tell ya what. You stated that you have debunked all of this many times.
Show me ONE post where you have with anything other than the 9/11 commission report.
Copy/paste it right here ----> <------
Dodge!
Keep that up and you'll make employee of the month. So, you try to debunk all conspiracy's? Sounds like a shill to me.
Unlike you I have a life and am logging off for the night.
Goodnight straw man.
All the righties on this site naturally reject any suggestion that the Bush Admin. were so corrupt as to do this most evil of deeds. I also rejected the idea at first, I didn't want to believe it either.
The fact is , regardless of a four story building which collapsed do to fire, we're talking about a modern 47 story steel frame structure suddenly collapsing to the ground. Nothing like that has ever happened, and if a simple office fire could cause Building 7 to collapse like that then every other steel frame office tower in the world is at risk of the same thing.
Obviously this argument could go on for ever, except that this can't be kept quiet, more and more people are relizing that this was no accident.
If it smells like I'm talking conspiracy here, let me assure you, I AM!.
Then you're a fucking idiot. Shut up and go away.
I think it has been proven that the demise of column 79 caused the initial load change on the structure and precipitated the collapse. Fires were burning for 2 hours inside the building causing sustained heat to be transferred to supporting columns and heat is the enemy for any structure. Most steel structure fires are fought within minutes by fire personnel or interior fire suppression systems so basing this on other fires is a no brainer.
http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf
If it smells like I'm talking conspiracy here, let me assure you, I AM!.
Then you're a fucking idiot. Shut up and go away.
the OCTA'S always makes posts like this to cover up their fear they have that it was an inside job.
thats a VERY good impersonation of Wicked Jester by the way when he is presented evidence and facts to address.
I think it has been proven that the demise of column 79 caused the initial load change on the structure and precipitated the collapse. Fires were burning for 2 hours inside the building causing sustained heat to be transferred to supporting columns and heat is the enemy for any structure. Most steel structure fires are fought within minutes by fire personnel or interior fire suppression systems so basing this on other fires is a no brainer.
http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf
Nope.wrong.you are obvioulsy not aware of the tape recordings that have been released where firefighters are on there saying that the fires should be out very soon.not only that, if you accept the fairy tales of the government,your saying that the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years no longer applies anymore.lol and that all these architects and engineers and firemen experienced in explosives are wrong.nope.wrong.
Then you're a fucking idiot. Shut up and go away.
the OCTA'S always makes posts like this to cover up their fear they have that it was an inside job.
thats a VERY good impersonation of Wicked Jester by the way when he is presented evidence and facts to address.
You ARE a fucking idiot. Shut the fuck up and go the fuck away.
Like I said,you do a PERFECT imitation of him when confronted with evidence and facts. dont worry,I wont feed you anymore troll.thats enough.I think it has been proven that the demise of column 79 caused the initial load change on the structure and precipitated the collapse. Fires were burning for 2 hours inside the building causing sustained heat to be transferred to supporting columns and heat is the enemy for any structure. Most steel structure fires are fought within minutes by fire personnel or interior fire suppression systems so basing this on other fires is a no brainer.
http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf
Nope.wrong.you are obvioulsy not aware of the tape recordings that have been released where firefighters are on there saying that the fires should be out very soon.not only that, if you accept the fairy tales of the government,your saying that the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years no longer applies anymore.lol and that all these architects and engineers and firemen experienced in explosives are wrong.nope.wrong.
And these same people will tell you that they do not know everything. No matter how smart we are there are always things we do not understand. Structural failure is a very real problem in man-made structures. This building during construction had change orders that altered the very load bearing of the structure. If it was built as originally designed, it may have not failed. But designers back then did not take into account the load shift by failure of individual columns. They did not have the computer simulations they have now to run scenarios and load tests.
the OCTA'S always makes posts like this to cover up their fear they have that it was an inside job.
thats a VERY good impersonation of Wicked Jester by the way when he is presented evidence and facts to address.
You ARE a fucking idiot. Shut the fuck up and go the fuck away.
Love your rebuttals .
Nope.wrong.you are obvioulsy not aware of the tape recordings that have been released where firefighters are on there saying that the fires should be out very soon.not only that, if you accept the fairy tales of the government,your saying that the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years no longer applies anymore.lol and that all these architects and engineers and firemen experienced in explosives are wrong.nope.wrong.
And these same people will tell you that they do not know everything. No matter how smart we are there are always things we do not understand. Structural failure is a very real problem in man-made structures. This building during construction had change orders that altered the very load bearing of the structure. If it was built as originally designed, it may have not failed. But designers back then did not take into account the load shift by failure of individual columns. They did not have the computer simulations they have now to run scenarios and load tests.
you might want to actually read the link before going any further and you should read the book "DEBUNKING THE 9/11 DEBUNKING,an answer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory" which is all the governments version is.that book has never been debunked.if your serious about this and not a troll like all the OCTA'S are that have come on this thread so far ,you WILL read that book and read that link as well and see that the official version is B.S.are you game? Will you read that book and that link? something tells me you wont take that challenge,None of the OCTA'S s ever do so I doubt that you will be the first.
