Corlew's latest ruling reiterated that Islam is a religion.
"Though the evidence has shown that there are groups which advocate violence and advocate laws at variance with the laws of our nation, there is no showing that the local church, as a whole, supports any such beliefs," Corlew wrote. "The evidence further shows that those extremists views are separate from the religion of Islam.
"The plaintiffs have established that there may be extremist members within the group of worshipers even here in Rutherford County, but that does not change the fact that Islam exists as a religion apart from the extremist philosophies."
Brandon disagreed with Corlew's position on Islam.
"Chancellor Corlew seems to go on and on that it's been decided that Islam is a religion, and we take issue with that," Brandon said. "There's no proof in this case that Islam is a religion. There is no case law or code that Islam is a religion.
"We would agree that there are religious aspects of Islam, but there are also legal, political and cultural aspects of Islam that can hardly be defined as religious. Further, the legal, political and cultural aspects make up the majority of the doctrine known as Islam."
Brandon also contends that Corlew didn't deal with the Tennessee Declaratory Judgment Act that grants citizens the right to ask through the courts that statutes or zoning ordinances be declared void as a result of being unconstitutional.