Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

[Moonglow]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

If there is no proof and the Democrats are in the right, then the Dems shouldnt have any reason to deny a recount.
If this was a fair and accurate count, then prove it. We have the time.
If someone accuses you of stealing, then wouldnt you like to prove them wrong ?

The burden of guilt is put up those making the claim that there was a grievous action..Those are called plaintiffs and the ones defending the charges are the defendants.

 

[Dogbiscuit]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

If there is no proof and the Democrats are in the right, then the Dems shouldnt have any reason to deny a recount.
If this was a fair and accurate count, then prove it. We have the time.
If someone accuses you of stealing, then wouldnt you like to prove them wrong ?

The burden of guilt is put up those making the claim that there was a grievous action..Those are called plaintiffs and the ones defending the charges are the defendants.

Thank you Ironside.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

One of the complaints Trumpybear filed was because an observer were so close they could read the ballots?

No, what I said is that it's not possible that an observer from six feet away can see the ballot. I don't know how they keep score of the number of votes for each candidate, but I'd be willing to bet the observers couldn't see where they were tallying the vote either.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Well let's just start with sufficient evidence which is lacking as of yet.

With this particular case it's about judicial activism. All ballots must be cast by Election Day. That's the law in their state. However a PA judge decided he didn't like the law, and said they can count ballots up to three days after the election. What the Republicans are asking is that those ballots be thrown out because you can't change laws on the bench. They absolutely have a case. This is the same thing that happened in the Gore/ Bush race.

Those ballots were separated and are a small amount of ballots, not even enough to tilt the votes in Trumps favor.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

Besides being scared half to death that Trump is the winner, what are you chinamen worried about if there is no proof?

Nobody is scared, I know he lost it fair and square, YOU are scared of a country without Trump as prez, thus the wacky unsupported claims of fraud.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

If there is no proof and the Democrats are in the right, then the Dems shouldnt have any reason to deny a recount.

Who's denying a recount? Trump still will not win, lol. Name one time when a recount won somebody an election in a presidential race, I'll wait.

If this was a fair and accurate count, then prove it. We have the time.
If someone accuses you of stealing, then wouldnt you like to prove them wrong ?

If there was fraud prove it with evidence.

The evidence comes in court. It's a judge and jury they have to convince not some left wing wombat on a message board.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

YOU are scared of a country without Trump as prez, thus the wacky unsupported claims of fraud.

Not scared of a country without Trump, deathly frightened of a country with Biden in charge. All you have to do is listen to what he said and go to his website.

Do you call a signed affidavit of fraud by a poll worker unsupported claims?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Those ballots were separated and are a small amount of ballots, not even enough to tilt the votes in Trumps favor.

And you know this how? I mean, if that were the case, why didn't they just say they'd throw them out?

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

Math and science says Dems cheated.

Sure they did even in Pa where Republican house, senate and attorney general makes the rules,

They don’t control control districts/precincts in Dem strongholds like Philly.

Or more importantly oh, they don't control the PA Supreme Court, which is how this entire sham of changing the voting rules at the 11th Hour was pulled off

 

[progressive hunter]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

why do you thing SCOTUS would take up a case without evidence???

are you just mad they didnt run it through you first???

 

[Indeependent]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

why do you thing SCOTUS would take up a case without evidence???

are you just mad they didnt run it through you first???

WARNING!
You are communicating with the Mentally Ill!

 

[busybee01]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

10 fascists who are trying to stage a real coup. Not the imaginary ones Trump supporters are always claiming.

 

[Juicin]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

They filed a brief saying more mail in voting and mass mailing ballots increasing the risk of voter fraud

That's obviously true

WHat the **** is wrong with you? My god

Such shit takes

 

[Dragonlady]

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

Proof comes at trial, genius.

There are no "trials" in appeals courts. The SC doesn't do "trials". This isn't a criminal case.

 

[busybee01]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

Math and science says Dems cheated.

Sure they did even in Pa where Republican house, senate and attorney general makes the rules,

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has a right to interpret the Constitution. If they don't like it then legislators can pass a amendment to the state Constitution. The legislature does not have the power to violate the state Constitution. According to your reasoning, Congress could pass a law banning guns irregardless of the 2nd Amendment.

 

[busybee01]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

They filed a brief saying more mail in voting and mass mailing ballots increasing the risk of voter fraud

That's obviously true

WHat the **** is wrong with you? My god

Such shit takes

Where is the proof of this? Several states hold all main-in elections and there is no evidence of massive fraud. Just saying it does not make it so. There is nothing obviously true about it.

 

[Juicin]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

They filed a brief saying more mail in voting and mass mailing ballots increasing the risk of voter fraud

That's obviously true

WHat the **** is wrong with you? My god

Such shit takes

Where is the proof of this? Several states hold all main-in elections and there is no evidence of massive fraud. Just saying it does not make it so. There is nothing obviously true about it.

Why would i need to prove there was mass voter fraud

THat's not what they're ******* saying. THey're saying they negligently upped the risk, which they did. And that SCOTUS had no ability to rule on the subject anyway.

YOu don't have to be a genius to be a lawyer, but you do need to be able to read

 

[OKTexas]

Ten Republican Attorneys General File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

A group of ten Republican attorneys general announced Monday that they are filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in a case challenging mail ballots in Pennsylvania, arguing that the state increased the risk of fraud in the election.Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led the group in...

news.yahoo.com

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

PA violated their own ******* election laws, idiot. The Governor and State supreme court have no authority to change election procedures, that is constitutionally the responsibility of the State legislature. The legislature made no changes. PA will lose on the merits.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Another baseless suit that has no proof of fraud lol, where is the proof? Should of. could of, would of, is not proof

Proof comes at trial, genius.

The proof is publicly known. PA will lose.

.

 

[OKTexas]

We should be learning how to better practice voting in our democracy.

How about we start with the States following their own laws.

.