- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,518
- 2,165
- Banned
- #101
I guess you are a statist big government Republican. OK.Both/and, not either/or. We can do all that.Why? We have the troops, so let's train them on the ground. Cheaper in the long run.Why do we have to choose one or the other? Machine gun towers every 500 meters with authorization to shoot any pygmies they see would go well with the latest technology available for detecting tunnels and imploding them, burying the little beaners alive.More wall and more seat belts and more gun laws do make people safer. You fell into it.Actually, walls and seatbelts do make people safer. Walls actually work, not only in keeping out criminal aliens, but also the drugs that pour into our country. We should have thought of this years ago!Building more seat belts in the care is not going to make it safer. Building more walls is not going to make safer. Stronger gun laws is not going to make guns safer. My thinking is fine but yours lyin..
But . . . the wall won't be extended significantly at all.
You want to get hold of the situation. Use drones and sensors and mechanized patrols of the Army and the AR and USNG. Simple tweaking with the laws. Put our troops down there in four month rotations. That would shut down almost all illegal entries.