TeaBagger
VIP Member
- Jan 25, 2016
- 1,394
- 161
- 65
Cruz Linked to "Suicide" Death of DC Madame
The Ashley Madison hack is back after the Supreme Court adds the DC Madam phone list to the docket. Various sources listed in this story confirm that Ted Cruz’s phone number and email addresses are identified in the Ashley Madison hack. This hack exposed hundreds of high profile government officials.
According to lawyers, Ted Cruz’s contact information appears to have contacted the same escorts identified in a 2008 suicide by hanging. Multiple sources have confirmed the data is accurate and all accounts have been compiled below.
Smoking Gun: Search - Supreme Court of the United States
Twitter accounts claiming to be allied with Anonymous have dropped alleged phone records of late DC madam Deborah Palfrey, showing Ted Cruz used her services.
One of the several Twitter accounts tied to the hacktivist group, @0Hour1, tauntingly posted a screenshot of the call log, with Texas calls highlighted:
screengrab courtesy of northcrane.com
Hey Teddy Cruz #Anonymous#CruzSexScandal
We dont DDOS
or bluff! will let the rest of you figure out the document! pic.twitter.com/nnuRioGutv
— 0 (@0Hour1) April 1, 2016
Other accounts are sharing a more detailed record through torrents, which appear to be circulating widely.
The date 9/16, highlighted in the screencap, is where multiple calls were made to various hotels. Blogger The Marshall Report claims the numbers are Cruz’s private numbers.
If you don’t know what this is. It is a page of Debora Pelfrey,s phone records.(The DC Madam) Ted Cruz private numbers are on it!
http://gawker.com/disbarred-birther-attorney-says-he-has-records-from-dc-1767915692
Conspiracy message board GLP that another number on the call log is that of a wire transfer service titled M Lhuillier LLC.
GLP also reports that the original TIFS, along with pdf, ZIP, and csv file versions have all been online since 2007.
The day before the alleged documents were released, lawyer Montgomery Blair Sibley, who represented the late DC madam, told US News and World Report that the call logs of his former client were already online.
Sibley said the records, which he called “very relevant” to the 2016 presidential election, will become public if he fails to reset a 72-hour countdown clock. This part of an effort to get federal courts to consider lifting a 2007 gag order on the records, preventing their release.
DC madam Deborah Palfrey with her lawyer, Montgomery Blair Sibley.
Sibley represented Palfrey after her 2006 arrest for running an escort service popular among Washington’s upper class. In 2007, he released call logs containing about 10,000 phone numbers, which resulted in the outing of prominent political leaders including Sen. David Vitter, deputy secretary of state Randall Tobias, former Clinton administration official Dick Morris – all Republicans. He says he held back 5,000 numbers for leverage at trial – but Palfrey fired him before she was found guilty in April 2008 of money laundering and other crimes.
Two weeks after her conviction, Palfrey was found in her mother’s shed with a nylon rope around her neck, dead from apparent suicide.
A major hurdle for Sibley’s bid to modify the 2007 court order protecting the records is that Palfrey fired him.
As previously reported, an unknown prostitute was named as one of the women who allegedly had an affair with Cruz.
WATCH OUT TED CRUZ – Start watching at the 8-minute mark.
Anonymous might or might not have already released the phone records showing Ted Cruz is the guilty party. You can read about that here and here.
Sibley just filed on Monday, and it was added to the docket Friday.
It doesn’t automatically mean they will take up the case, but it does mean Justice Roberts is taking it seriously, as he should. And the other 3 courts who have been ignoring Sibley for months should be ridiculed and ashamed.
Blair Sibley, with his Texas-size cojones in full view, told MSNBC today he will release the list of names if the Supreme Court denies him. So this is absolutely, positively going to be released – Either legally or illegally.
I would certainly hope there are no SCOTUS names or numbers on the DC Madam list.
D.C. Madam’s Attorney Says Election Bombshell Already Online
The colorful litigator who represented the late “D.C. madam” Deborah Palfrey and threatened this week to release his former client’s call logs that he says are “very relevant” to the 2016 presidential election tells U.S. News those records already are digitized and posted online.
Montgomery Blair Sibley says the records will become public if he fails to reset a 72-hour countdown clock, which could cut short his soft two-week ultimatum for federal courts to consider lifting a 2007 gag order that covers the records, lest he deem that order void.
The countdown clock is a safeguard, Sibley says, that ensures that if he disappears the records will be published. Inevitable release, he says, may also disincentivize violent acts against him to prevent their disclosure.
Earlier this week the lawyer for the former “DC Madam” said he had a record log of contacts that could “upend the 2016 election.”
Attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley has a GoFundMe page set up to pay for his court costs if he releases the phone records.
Montgomery Blair Sibley recently released a video saying he has the list of contacts relevant to the 2016 presidential race.
This could be Ted Cruz’s worst nightmare.
Today attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley said the records were already online.
US News reported:
The colorful litigator who represented the late “D.C. madam” Deborah Palfrey and threatened this week to release his former client’s call logs that he says are “very relevant” to the 2016 presidential election tells U.S. News those records already are digitized and posted online.
Montgomery Blair Sibley says the records will become public if he fails to reset a 72-hour countdown clock, which could cut short his soft two-week ultimatum for federal courts to consider lifting a 2007 gag order that covers the records, lest he deem that order void.
The countdown clock is a safeguard, Sibley says, that ensures that if he disappears the records will be published. Inevitable release, he says, may also disincentivize violent acts against him to prevent their disclosure.
The records are stored on four servers around the world, Sibley says, and dozens of reporters will receive a website link if the clock is not reset. He says he loaded the information online in January, when he decided to publicly claim the records are relevant to the presidential race.
“There’s a link right now, that if you had, you would have access to the records,” Sibley says about the website. “If I die, disappear, whatever, they will be out.”
A similar tactic was embraced by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2010 with release of an encrypted “insurance” file that could be unlocked with a password if the besieged transparency advocate chose to distribute it.
“If you’re asking if I’m partnering with WikiLeaks, the answer is I’m not answering that,” Sibley says without any prodding about the secrets-spilling site.
Sibley says his website hosts PDFs of Palfrey call logs that contain about 5,000 phone numbers, along with downloadable spreadsheets that contain the names and addresses of 815 Verizon Wireless customers from those logs, which he acquired with a subpoena ahead of Palfrey’s trial.
The records are stored on four servers around the world, Sibley says, and dozens of reporters will receive a website link if the clock is not reset. He says he loaded the information online in January, when he decided to publicly claim the records are relevant to the presidential race.
“There’s a link right now, that if you had, you would have access to the records,” Sibley says about the website. “If I die, disappear, whatever, they will be out.”
A similar tactic was embraced by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2010 with release of an encrypted ” insurance” file that could be unlocked with a password if the besieged transparency advocate chose to distribute it.
“If you’re asking if I’m partnering with WikiLeaks, the answer is I’m not answering that,” Sibley says without any prodding about the secrets-spilling site.
Sibley says his website hosts PDFs of Palfrey call logs that contain about 5,000 phone numbers, along with downloadable spreadsheets that contain the names and addresses of 815 Verizon Wireless customers from those logs, which he acquired with a subpoena ahead of Palfrey’s trial.
Sibley represented Palfrey after her 2006 arrest for running an escort service popular among Washington’s upper class. In 2007 , he released call logs containing about 10,000 phone numbers, which resulted in the outing of prominent political leaders including Sen. David Vitter, R-La. He says he held back 5,000 numbers for leverage at trial — but Palfrey fired him before she was found guilty in April 2008 of money laundering and other crimes.
Two weeks after her conviction, Palfrey was found in her mother’s shed with a nylon rope around her neck, dead from apparent suicide.
A major hurdle for Sibley’s bid to modify the 2007 court order protecting the records is that Palfrey fired him.
Then- U.S. District Judge Richard Roberts in January instructed a clerk not to accept Sibley’s motion requesting reconsideration of the restraining order, writing: “Why Sibley would have possession of subpoenaed records in a case from which he has been terminated and why he would not instead have turned all copies of them over to the defendant’s continuing counsel of record is not set forth in the motion.”
Sibley says Roberts — who resigned earlier this month on the day he was sued for alleged sexual assault — wrongly assumed he had no right to the records. He says he was retained for Palfrey’s appeal, was her mother’s attorney at the time of Palfrey’s death and that he worked for a while on a civil lawsuit.
He also says he delivered original copies of all records to attorney Preston Burton, who represented Palfrey at trial and, Sibley says, later replaced him on the civil lawsuit.
Thus far, Sibley has not heard back from the D.C. Circuit federal appeals court or from the Supreme Court, which he asked on Monday to force the District Court to accept his motion about the records. He said Monday he would wait two weeks for courts to act, but now says the situation is so fluid the time frame may change.
Burton did not respond to an email seeking comment on the records. Sibley says he currently has no physical copies.
Matthew Green, a computer science professor at Johns Hopkins University, says it’s unclear to him how secure Sibley’s unadvertised website is from prying eyes.
“Wow, that sounds a little crazy,” Green says in an email. “I’m not sure if there are any services that do this reliably — you would have to cobble something together. Is the information safe sitting on four servers? I guess it depends on which four servers. Presumably Google is safer than some random server sitting in a closet somewhere. But it doesn’t sound very safe to me.”
Green says if Sibley is partnering with WikiLeaks, there would be a different set of considerations.
“Wikileaks does have some security expertise, so it’s probably more secure against random hackers,” he says. “On the other hand, Wikileaks has some fairly sophisticated adversaries, including nation states — so their server infrastructure has a much bigger target on it. But the real question is: if Wikileaks has the data, can you trust Wikileaks not to do anything with it?”
Sibley has refused to provide any clues about what information relevant to the presidential election he claims to have. He says he’s not concerned that some citizens are incorrectly guessing about one of the five remaining candidates in the Democratic and Republican primaries.
Sibley says he currently is not licensed to practice law — the result of a 2008 suspension in Florida for filing “vexatious and meritless” lawsuits against judges and for a child support payment dispute, for which he faced reciprocal discipline in D.C. — and has no plans to seek readmission to the D.C. Bar.
“I have no desire to be part of a profession I consider to be profoundly corrupt to its core,” he says. “I’m hacking at the roots of tyranny, not its branches.”
TWITTER
FACEBOOK
GOOGLE +
PINTEREST
The Ashley Madison hack is back after the Supreme Court adds the DC Madam phone list to the docket. Various sources listed in this story confirm that Ted Cruz’s phone number and email addresses are identified in the Ashley Madison hack. This hack exposed hundreds of high profile government officials.
According to lawyers, Ted Cruz’s contact information appears to have contacted the same escorts identified in a 2008 suicide by hanging. Multiple sources have confirmed the data is accurate and all accounts have been compiled below.
Smoking Gun: Search - Supreme Court of the United States
Twitter accounts claiming to be allied with Anonymous have dropped alleged phone records of late DC madam Deborah Palfrey, showing Ted Cruz used her services.
One of the several Twitter accounts tied to the hacktivist group, @0Hour1, tauntingly posted a screenshot of the call log, with Texas calls highlighted:
screengrab courtesy of northcrane.com
Hey Teddy Cruz #Anonymous#CruzSexScandal
We dont DDOS
or bluff! will let the rest of you figure out the document! pic.twitter.com/nnuRioGutv
— 0 (@0Hour1) April 1, 2016
Other accounts are sharing a more detailed record through torrents, which appear to be circulating widely.
The date 9/16, highlighted in the screencap, is where multiple calls were made to various hotels. Blogger The Marshall Report claims the numbers are Cruz’s private numbers.
If you don’t know what this is. It is a page of Debora Pelfrey,s phone records.(The DC Madam) Ted Cruz private numbers are on it!
http://gawker.com/disbarred-birther-attorney-says-he-has-records-from-dc-1767915692
Conspiracy message board GLP that another number on the call log is that of a wire transfer service titled M Lhuillier LLC.
GLP also reports that the original TIFS, along with pdf, ZIP, and csv file versions have all been online since 2007.
The day before the alleged documents were released, lawyer Montgomery Blair Sibley, who represented the late DC madam, told US News and World Report that the call logs of his former client were already online.
Sibley said the records, which he called “very relevant” to the 2016 presidential election, will become public if he fails to reset a 72-hour countdown clock. This part of an effort to get federal courts to consider lifting a 2007 gag order on the records, preventing their release.
DC madam Deborah Palfrey with her lawyer, Montgomery Blair Sibley.
Sibley represented Palfrey after her 2006 arrest for running an escort service popular among Washington’s upper class. In 2007, he released call logs containing about 10,000 phone numbers, which resulted in the outing of prominent political leaders including Sen. David Vitter, deputy secretary of state Randall Tobias, former Clinton administration official Dick Morris – all Republicans. He says he held back 5,000 numbers for leverage at trial – but Palfrey fired him before she was found guilty in April 2008 of money laundering and other crimes.
Two weeks after her conviction, Palfrey was found in her mother’s shed with a nylon rope around her neck, dead from apparent suicide.
A major hurdle for Sibley’s bid to modify the 2007 court order protecting the records is that Palfrey fired him.
As previously reported, an unknown prostitute was named as one of the women who allegedly had an affair with Cruz.
WATCH OUT TED CRUZ – Start watching at the 8-minute mark.
Anonymous might or might not have already released the phone records showing Ted Cruz is the guilty party. You can read about that here and here.
Sibley just filed on Monday, and it was added to the docket Friday.
It doesn’t automatically mean they will take up the case, but it does mean Justice Roberts is taking it seriously, as he should. And the other 3 courts who have been ignoring Sibley for months should be ridiculed and ashamed.
Blair Sibley, with his Texas-size cojones in full view, told MSNBC today he will release the list of names if the Supreme Court denies him. So this is absolutely, positively going to be released – Either legally or illegally.
I would certainly hope there are no SCOTUS names or numbers on the DC Madam list.
D.C. Madam’s Attorney Says Election Bombshell Already Online
The colorful litigator who represented the late “D.C. madam” Deborah Palfrey and threatened this week to release his former client’s call logs that he says are “very relevant” to the 2016 presidential election tells U.S. News those records already are digitized and posted online.
Montgomery Blair Sibley says the records will become public if he fails to reset a 72-hour countdown clock, which could cut short his soft two-week ultimatum for federal courts to consider lifting a 2007 gag order that covers the records, lest he deem that order void.
The countdown clock is a safeguard, Sibley says, that ensures that if he disappears the records will be published. Inevitable release, he says, may also disincentivize violent acts against him to prevent their disclosure.
Earlier this week the lawyer for the former “DC Madam” said he had a record log of contacts that could “upend the 2016 election.”
Attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley has a GoFundMe page set up to pay for his court costs if he releases the phone records.
Montgomery Blair Sibley recently released a video saying he has the list of contacts relevant to the 2016 presidential race.
This could be Ted Cruz’s worst nightmare.
Today attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley said the records were already online.
US News reported:
The colorful litigator who represented the late “D.C. madam” Deborah Palfrey and threatened this week to release his former client’s call logs that he says are “very relevant” to the 2016 presidential election tells U.S. News those records already are digitized and posted online.
Montgomery Blair Sibley says the records will become public if he fails to reset a 72-hour countdown clock, which could cut short his soft two-week ultimatum for federal courts to consider lifting a 2007 gag order that covers the records, lest he deem that order void.
The countdown clock is a safeguard, Sibley says, that ensures that if he disappears the records will be published. Inevitable release, he says, may also disincentivize violent acts against him to prevent their disclosure.
The records are stored on four servers around the world, Sibley says, and dozens of reporters will receive a website link if the clock is not reset. He says he loaded the information online in January, when he decided to publicly claim the records are relevant to the presidential race.
“There’s a link right now, that if you had, you would have access to the records,” Sibley says about the website. “If I die, disappear, whatever, they will be out.”
A similar tactic was embraced by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2010 with release of an encrypted “insurance” file that could be unlocked with a password if the besieged transparency advocate chose to distribute it.
“If you’re asking if I’m partnering with WikiLeaks, the answer is I’m not answering that,” Sibley says without any prodding about the secrets-spilling site.
Sibley says his website hosts PDFs of Palfrey call logs that contain about 5,000 phone numbers, along with downloadable spreadsheets that contain the names and addresses of 815 Verizon Wireless customers from those logs, which he acquired with a subpoena ahead of Palfrey’s trial.
The records are stored on four servers around the world, Sibley says, and dozens of reporters will receive a website link if the clock is not reset. He says he loaded the information online in January, when he decided to publicly claim the records are relevant to the presidential race.
“There’s a link right now, that if you had, you would have access to the records,” Sibley says about the website. “If I die, disappear, whatever, they will be out.”
A similar tactic was embraced by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2010 with release of an encrypted ” insurance” file that could be unlocked with a password if the besieged transparency advocate chose to distribute it.
“If you’re asking if I’m partnering with WikiLeaks, the answer is I’m not answering that,” Sibley says without any prodding about the secrets-spilling site.
Sibley says his website hosts PDFs of Palfrey call logs that contain about 5,000 phone numbers, along with downloadable spreadsheets that contain the names and addresses of 815 Verizon Wireless customers from those logs, which he acquired with a subpoena ahead of Palfrey’s trial.
Sibley represented Palfrey after her 2006 arrest for running an escort service popular among Washington’s upper class. In 2007 , he released call logs containing about 10,000 phone numbers, which resulted in the outing of prominent political leaders including Sen. David Vitter, R-La. He says he held back 5,000 numbers for leverage at trial — but Palfrey fired him before she was found guilty in April 2008 of money laundering and other crimes.
Two weeks after her conviction, Palfrey was found in her mother’s shed with a nylon rope around her neck, dead from apparent suicide.
A major hurdle for Sibley’s bid to modify the 2007 court order protecting the records is that Palfrey fired him.
Then- U.S. District Judge Richard Roberts in January instructed a clerk not to accept Sibley’s motion requesting reconsideration of the restraining order, writing: “Why Sibley would have possession of subpoenaed records in a case from which he has been terminated and why he would not instead have turned all copies of them over to the defendant’s continuing counsel of record is not set forth in the motion.”
Sibley says Roberts — who resigned earlier this month on the day he was sued for alleged sexual assault — wrongly assumed he had no right to the records. He says he was retained for Palfrey’s appeal, was her mother’s attorney at the time of Palfrey’s death and that he worked for a while on a civil lawsuit.
He also says he delivered original copies of all records to attorney Preston Burton, who represented Palfrey at trial and, Sibley says, later replaced him on the civil lawsuit.
Thus far, Sibley has not heard back from the D.C. Circuit federal appeals court or from the Supreme Court, which he asked on Monday to force the District Court to accept his motion about the records. He said Monday he would wait two weeks for courts to act, but now says the situation is so fluid the time frame may change.
Burton did not respond to an email seeking comment on the records. Sibley says he currently has no physical copies.
Matthew Green, a computer science professor at Johns Hopkins University, says it’s unclear to him how secure Sibley’s unadvertised website is from prying eyes.
“Wow, that sounds a little crazy,” Green says in an email. “I’m not sure if there are any services that do this reliably — you would have to cobble something together. Is the information safe sitting on four servers? I guess it depends on which four servers. Presumably Google is safer than some random server sitting in a closet somewhere. But it doesn’t sound very safe to me.”
Green says if Sibley is partnering with WikiLeaks, there would be a different set of considerations.
“Wikileaks does have some security expertise, so it’s probably more secure against random hackers,” he says. “On the other hand, Wikileaks has some fairly sophisticated adversaries, including nation states — so their server infrastructure has a much bigger target on it. But the real question is: if Wikileaks has the data, can you trust Wikileaks not to do anything with it?”
Sibley has refused to provide any clues about what information relevant to the presidential election he claims to have. He says he’s not concerned that some citizens are incorrectly guessing about one of the five remaining candidates in the Democratic and Republican primaries.
Sibley says he currently is not licensed to practice law — the result of a 2008 suspension in Florida for filing “vexatious and meritless” lawsuits against judges and for a child support payment dispute, for which he faced reciprocal discipline in D.C. — and has no plans to seek readmission to the D.C. Bar.
“I have no desire to be part of a profession I consider to be profoundly corrupt to its core,” he says. “I’m hacking at the roots of tyranny, not its branches.”
GOOGLE +
