Teaching biblical truth could get your kids taken away

[JoeB131]

We've long held it entirely proper to discriminate against men by denying them access to women's restrooms, dressing rooms, locker rooms, and similar facilities. It's not about religion, but about basic decency. There is no reason why exceptions should be made for mentally- and morally-defective perverts who are men but claim to be women. The only thing it has to do with religion is as an example of some of the insane and immoral crap that Satan uses to fill in the holes left when one foolishly denies God.

Uh, dude, through most of history, men and women used the same facilities. I fact, the first law mandating separate bathrooms wasn't passed until - wait for it - 1887.

Why Do We Have Men's and Women's Bathrooms Anyway?

At a nadir of my career, I sought work through an outfit called Labor Ready. It was day labor, very often hard, dirty work on construction sites, for not much above minimum wage. During that time, my attitude toward panhandlers changed. There was plenty of work available, for anyone willing to do it. Anyone who was willing to work as hard as I did could make just as much as I was making. I figured that a panhandler could go to Labor Ready, if he wanted, and do the same work I was doing,and thus had no need to beg for handouts from me. If he wasn't wiling to work as hard as I was, then I saw no reason why I should share with him the fruits of my labor.

I'm not talking about panhandlers, most of whom have mental issues that make it impossible for them to hold down a job.

I'm talking about kids working minimum wage jobs.

The thing is, I've seen the economy so bad at times guys with college degrees were working in warehouses, and I've seen times so good they paid teenagers above minimum wage to fill positions. The thing is, the one percent s houldn't be able to cheat those who do the work.

I really do not see much difference between you and those panhandlers.

Of course not. Religious assholes ALWAYS have to think that people who don't share their fucked up superstitions must be "bad".

 

[martybegan]

And again, these are the people you want to give MORE power to by making them the only legal armed force in a given community. Make up your ******* mind.

I've made up my mind.

I want to put a stop to the 32,000 gun deaths, including the 1200 gun deaths at the hands of police.

Fact is, in the UK, they've already figured this out. They've shot all of 54 civilians in the last 25 years. That's what happens when only the police have guns... they show restraint.

Slippery slope argument, fail.

We have airline pilots selling blood plasma and adjunct professors on food stamps. The Slippery Slope is already here.

/----- How can you twist yourself into a pretzel and still manage to post a reply? The question was how can one live on minimum wage and I gave you a solution. How did you twist that into "I got mine **** you"? $12 x 40 hours = $480. Add 8 hours on Saturday for $96 and then you make $576. Still not a lot but more money until you can get a better paying job.

You do realize that the minimum wage isn't $12.00 an hour, right?

Oh so it's the victim who is at fault. How liberal of you. Someone steals from you, does that make you a jerk? BTW when it happened to me I filed complaints but they went no where. I moved on to a better job.

Ah... that's what I thought. YOu made such an ass of yourself that the CSR's intentionally sabotaged you.

Everyone isn't in a stall.
Some are in a public locker room. Some are using large bay shower rooms. You'd say anything to win an argument, the truth doesn't matter to you.

sure it does. Here's the ugly truth. Trannies are just another group the 1% get you to hate because they want to distract your attention from what they are doing to you.

Causation does not equal correlation.

Links

STOP GROUP RESPONDING YOU MISERABLE BASTARD.

 

[JoeB131]

Causation does not equal correlation.

Of course it does.

The reason why cops get away with shooting black children in the back when they have their hands up is "I thought he had a gun!!!!"

And unless someone bothers to get a videotape, they usually accept that.

Now, if you take away most of the guns from civilians, "I thought he had a gun before I shot him 16 times when he was lying on the ground" becomes a lot less plausible.

 

[martybegan]

Causation does not equal correlation.

Of course it does.

The reason why cops get away with shooting black children in the back when they have their hands up is "I thought he had a gun!!!!"

And unless someone bothers to get a videotape, they usually accept that.

Now, if you take away most of the guns from civilians, "I thought he had a gun before I shot him 16 times when he was lying on the ground" becomes a lot less plausible.

The problem is you won't take away guns from criminals, because they will always find a way to get them, even if you had to open up machine shops. Are you then going to say "we have to ban all lathes!!!"

 

[JoeB131]

The problem is you won't take away guns from criminals, because they will always find a way to get them, even if you had to open up machine shops. Are you then going to say "we have to ban all lathes!!!"

The problem with that mentality is--- other countries have done this.

Japan, Australia, the UK - all have banned private gun ownership, and they have very little gun violence and very little police brutality.

So saying "It can't be done" ignores the fact that others have done it.

 

[martybegan]

The problem is you won't take away guns from criminals, because they will always find a way to get them, even if you had to open up machine shops. Are you then going to say "we have to ban all lathes!!!"

The problem with that mentality is--- other countries have done this.

Japan, Australia, the UK - all have banned private gun ownership, and they have very little gun violence and very little police brutality.

So saying "It can't be done" ignores the fact that others have done it.

They don't ban it, they just really really restrict it, and they have other issues, such as suicide in Japan, Yobs with knives knowing they can attack people with impunity because they are unarmed, and lots of people in Australia's outback telling the government to **** off.

It shouldn't be done because all it does is treat the symptoms and not the disease, and unless you repeal the 2nd amendment, you can't do it here.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The problem is you won't take away guns from criminals, because they will always find a way to get them, even if you had to open up machine shops. Are you then going to say "we have to ban all lathes!!!"

The problem with that mentality is--- other countries have done this.

Japan, Australia, the UK - all have banned private gun ownership, and they have very little gun violence and very little police brutality.

So saying "It can't be done" ignores the fact that others have done it.

/---- Speaking of Japan, here is an explanation why their culture is different:
The secret of Japan’s mysteriously low crime rate
A Japanese friend of mine explained that going to prison would be an unimaginable social stigma for most people, leading to a widespread public perception that crimes are mostly committed by foreigners. The belief that almost all Japanese are law-abiding also creates a system that routinely treats suspects as guilty until proven otherwise. In such a hierarchical and deferential society, suspects face enormous pressure to cooperate with the investigators and admitting guilt, leading to a conviction rate in the courts of more than 99%. The criminal justice system is founded on a strong belief that the criminal must repent for his crime – not simply being punished the law – and Japanese prisons are well-known (or notorious) for their strict discipline and order.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

I have all respect for it, but I don't take it literally.

The thing is, 90% of what is in the bible is actually- pretty awful. Harsh laws and harsh punishments we'd consider cruel today. Yet Christians will pull out the few nice bits, ignore all the nasty stuff, and claim this is a guide for morality.

That's a lie.

 

[deanrd]

Biblical truth is an oxymoron like "Truthful Republican" or "Jumbo Shrimp".

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

So teaching your kids to hate other people ad believe in things that simply have no evidence is somehow good in your mind? Man, you're really screwed up.

Did you steal that sticker from the DNC?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Biblical truth is an oxymoron like "Truthful Republican" or "Jumbo Shrimp".

Or DerpTruth.

This thread is hilarious what with all you naysayers tripping and falling all over yourselves screaming religion is bad!!!!!

Freaking goof balls

 

[JoeB131]

They don't ban it, they just really really restrict it, and they have other issues, such as suicide in Japan, Yobs with knives knowing they can attack people with impunity because they are unarmed, and lots of people in Australia's outback telling the government to **** off.

None of which comes anywhere near the crime rates we have in the US. But I'm sure you'll just blame the Darkies.

Okay, find a country where they have gun laws as permissive as the US, and no crime. Thanks.

It shouldn't be done because all it does is treat the symptoms and not the disease, and unless you repeal the 2nd amendment, you can't do it here.

Sure we can. Here's a list of ways we can do it.

1) Get a majority on SCOTUS that can actually read the words, "Well-REgulated Militia"

2) Keep passing local laws and exhaust the resources of the National Rampage Association.

3) Pass strict gun liability laws that hold gun sellers and manufacturers responsible for the carnage.

We can **** with you gun nuts all day... and eventually, the 78% of us who don't own guns will win.

 

[JoeB131]

This thread is hilarious what with all you naysayers tripping and falling all over yourselves screaming religion is bad!!!!!

Inquisitions
Crusades
Jihads
Heretic Torture
Witch Burning
Altar Boy Sex Abuse
Suppression of Science

Yes. religion is bad.

 

[martybegan]

They don't ban it, they just really really restrict it, and they have other issues, such as suicide in Japan, Yobs with knives knowing they can attack people with impunity because they are unarmed, and lots of people in Australia's outback telling the government to **** off.

None of which comes anywhere near the crime rates we have in the US. But I'm sure you'll just blame the Darkies.

Okay, find a country where they have gun laws as permissive as the US, and no crime. Thanks.

It shouldn't be done because all it does is treat the symptoms and not the disease, and unless you repeal the 2nd amendment, you can't do it here.

Sure we can. Here's a list of ways we can do it.

1) Get a majority on SCOTUS that can actually read the words, "Well-REgulated Militia"

2) Keep passing local laws and exhaust the resources of the National Rampage Association.

3) Pass strict gun liability laws that hold gun sellers and manufacturers responsible for the carnage.

We can **** with you gun nuts all day... and eventually, the 78% of us who don't own guns will win.

No crime? Setting an impossible bar is the tactic of a person who knows they don't have a ******* point.

**** you you fascist ****. The world will be a better place when you are no longer part of it.

 

[JoeB131]

No crime? Setting an impossible bar is the tactic of a person who knows they don't have a ******* point.

Come on, you can't point to one. Mostly because no country has as many guns as we have...

**** you you fascist ****. The world will be a better place when you are no longer part of it.

Your little Temper Tantrum aside, I just listed ways that the majority could totally **** with you gun nuts.

I can put a few more on there.

4) Change local zoning and environmental laws to make it impossible to run a gun range.

5) Use local business regulations to keep gun stores out of most neighborhoods.

6) Require gun owners to carry expensive insurance.

 

[martybegan]

No crime? Setting an impossible bar is the tactic of a person who knows they don't have a ******* point.

Come on, you can't point to one. Mostly because no country has as many guns as we have...

**** you you fascist ****. The world will be a better place when you are no longer part of it.

Your little Temper Tantrum aside, I just listed ways that the majority could totally **** with you gun nuts.

I can put a few more on there.

4) Change local zoning and environmental laws to make it impossible to run a gun range.

5) Use local business regulations to keep gun stores out of most neighborhoods.

6) Require gun owners to carry expensive insurance.

You said "no crime". Again, impossible bar, wanker.

That method basically means the end of constitutional rule as we know it, and a civil war your side would lose.

4. violates 2nd amendment
5. violates 2nd amendment
6. violates 2nd amendment.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No crime? Setting an impossible bar is the tactic of a person who knows they don't have a ******* point.

Come on, you can't point to one. Mostly because no country has as many guns as we have...

**** you you fascist ****. The world will be a better place when you are no longer part of it.

Your little Temper Tantrum aside, I just listed ways that the majority could totally **** with you gun nuts.

I can put a few more on there.

4) Change local zoning and environmental laws to make it impossible to run a gun range.

5) Use local business regulations to keep gun stores out of most neighborhoods.

6) Require gun owners to carry expensive insurance.

You said "no crime". Again, impossible bar, wanker.

That method basically means the end of constitutional rule as we know it, and a civil war your side would lose.

4. violates 2nd amendment
5. violates 2nd amendment
6. violates 2nd amendment.

He doesn't, or is incapable of, grasping, shall not be infringed

 

[JoeB131]

You said "no crime". Again, impossible bar, wanker.

Can you name a country with shitloads of guns and LITTLE crime.. or even less crime than a gun-controlling democracy... no, no, you can't.

Because everyone else realized what a terrible thing it is letting people who have no business owning guns have them.

He doesn't, or is incapable of, grasping, shall not be infringed

sure...it comes after WELL REGULATED MILITIA.

These guys are not a WELL REGULATED MILITIA

 

[Slyhunter]

I think we should outlaw criminals.
That'll solve the problem.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You said "no crime". Again, impossible bar, wanker.

Can you name a country with shitloads of guns and LITTLE crime.. or even less crime than a gun-controlling democracy... no, no, you can't.

Because everyone else realized what a terrible thing it is letting people who have no business owning guns have them.

He doesn't, or is incapable of, grasping, shall not be infringed

sure...it comes after WELL REGULATED MILITIA.

These guys are not a WELL REGULATED MILITIA

You're stuck on militia and time and time again the courts rule against that argument. The fact remains gun ownership is a constituional right. After all it does say the right of the people....

Our Founding Fathers also understood the inalienable right of the people to protect themselves...and it shall not be infringed