Its bad language. The intent is what makes it hate.
Sorry, but calling a he a she or vice versa does not rise up to ethnic slurs, or at least one of them.
The speech has only the power given to it by the listener. Call me a mick or a wop, or guinea, or cracker. see if I care.
I agree, it is the intent is what makes it hate.
If I told my teacher my name is John but he insisted on calling me Jane or Moron. Is that hate? Don't we all get to be called by our given name? Why are pronouns any different?
Dear
alang1216
The debates seem to be whether to legally and scientifically
recognize gender based on genetics, or REQUIRE people
to recognize some internal/cultural identity that is arbitrarily decided.
It's closer to
* if a person has a religion by which they have a title like Captain.
And this person wants to REQUIRE another person to address
them as Captain which is part of their religious identity, culture, affiliation or PRACTICE.
* if a person has a NICKNAME such as Charlie instead of Charles,
or BUZZ instead of their legal name. And this person wants to require
another person to call them by their NICKNAME.
What are the school policies?
If the school requires teachers to use the LEGAL name,
and it's OPTIONAL to use nicknames, then that's up to the individual.
What are the rules in grammar and etiquette?
Last I checked, the rules that were taught on the books
recognized titles for Royalty (King/Queen, Prince/Princess, etc.)
Priests/Nuns/the Pope/Clergy of churches, and maybe Military and Government.
We just need to agree on the rules instead of leaving it
to confrontation and conflict to bring these up, or escalate to the point of lawsuits.
Are people suing if a teacher doesn't call a Buddhist monk by Reverend,
because that person doesn't recognize the Buddhist religion the same as Christians?