mal
Diamond Member
Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.

You plan on going on the road with that material?...

peace...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.
I opted to accept nothing. I called out hipocrisy, and rightly so.
i disagree.
It is not hypocrisy.....in my opinion.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with a constituant expressing being upset and hurt by an elected official calling him names whereas there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with a man who is considered the leader of the free world complaining about it being done to him....and something even MORE wrong with the leader of the free world comparing it as "the same thing".
And what really concerns me is that intelligent rational people like you actually see it as one in the same.
Have we really set the bar for the President so low?
He's a man like anyone else. He's allowed to take issue with ridicule, especially if he's being expected to answer for his co-workers.
This is not an example of a constituant approaching Obama about something Obama said. He's expecting Obama to answer for someone else. The constituent needs to grow up, and Obama said the right thing. I don't care if he's the biggest celebrity on the planet, he should still & always as a man stick up for himself. There's nothing wrong with that.
so let me see if I got this;
People call big 0 a kenyan and a socialist.
so that makes it OK for Biden to call Americans that disagree with him, terrorist.
This must be more of that "Fairness doctrine" non-sense.
and now they are saying the Biden seemed to have disagreed with someone else calling us terrorist.
If this wasn't such a pathetic pile of shit, it would be funny.
i disagree.
It is not hypocrisy.....in my opinion.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with a constituant expressing being upset and hurt by an elected official calling him names whereas there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with a man who is considered the leader of the free world complaining about it being done to him....and something even MORE wrong with the leader of the free world comparing it as "the same thing".
And what really concerns me is that intelligent rational people like you actually see it as one in the same.
Have we really set the bar for the President so low?
Well sure.
We (Well not me) elected a man that was convicted of a crime before he entered office.
First time in history.
President George W Bush.
Grats.![]()
Sure....twice for that matter.
So now you are comparing Obama to Bush....
You do realize that you are comparing Obama to what many believe is "the worst president in the history of our country"
That is like saying "my car is the best made in history....and if you think otherwise, remember how bad the pacer was....it is just like that".
Well sure.
We (Well not me) elected a man that was convicted of a crime before he entered office.
First time in history.
President George W Bush.
Grats.![]()
Sure....twice for that matter.
So now you are comparing Obama to Bush....
You do realize that you are comparing Obama to what many believe is "the worst president in the history of our country"
That is like saying "my car is the best made in history....and if you think otherwise, remember how bad the pacer was....it is just like that".
What crime was Obama convicted of?
i disagree.
It is not hypocrisy.....in my opinion.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with a constituant expressing being upset and hurt by an elected official calling him names whereas there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with a man who is considered the leader of the free world complaining about it being done to him....and something even MORE wrong with the leader of the free world comparing it as "the same thing".
And what really concerns me is that intelligent rational people like you actually see it as one in the same.
Have we really set the bar for the President so low?
He's a man like anyone else. He's allowed to take issue with ridicule, especially if he's being expected to answer for his co-workers.
This is not an example of a constituant approaching Obama about something Obama said. He's expecting Obama to answer for someone else. The constituent needs to grow up, and Obama said the right thing. I don't care if he's the biggest celebrity on the planet, he should still & always as a man stick up for himself. There's nothing wrong with that.
As a "leader" he had the responsibility to speak out when his "employees" say the crap they said about the tea partyers.
It is known as leadership...and it is exercising ones role as a leader. It is what leaders are expected to do.
If a group of soldiers publicly referred to civilians in a war zone as "whores and thieves" would you expect the general to say "that is not okay and they will be reprimanded" or would you expect him to say "what do you expect...they refer to our soldiers as murderers...."
Now...please....in the interest of a fair debate....be honest with your answer.
so let me see if I got this;
People call big 0 a kenyan and a socialist.
so that makes it OK for Biden to call Americans that disagree with him, terrorist.
This must be more of that "Fairness doctrine" non-sense.
and now they are saying the Biden seemed to have disagreed with someone else calling us terrorist.
If this wasn't such a pathetic pile of shit, it would be funny.
It has everything to do with your question
It has always been a democrat who was the first to question the birth place of a person.
Keep trying to dig out of the hole you have dugged. It's fun to watch.
Tell you what.
Link something that she publicly came out and made an issue of that.
There's no "hole" here.
Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.
Republicans do it all the time.
Sarah Palin - ****, stupid ****
GWB - hates black people, murderer, liar, traitor, stupid,etc
Tea Party - racists, terrorists
Michele Bachmann - nut-case, religious extremist, stupid
Herman Cain - uncle tom, house-negro, racist
Allen West - criminal
Dick Cheney - EVILE, criminal
Condi Rice - oreo, house-negro
Clarence Thomas - sex-offender, uncle tom, house-negro
Glenn Beck - cry-baby, nut-case, drunk
Rush Limbaugh - racist, heroin-addict
Mitt Romney - Mormon
Gerald Ford - clutz, stupid
Ronald Reagan - racist, stupid, war-monger
Fox News - faux news
The list goes on and on.
I'm trying to figure out what planet you're on.
so let me see if I got this;
People call big 0 a kenyan and a socialist.
so that makes it OK for Biden to call Americans that disagree with him, terrorist.
This must be more of that "Fairness doctrine" non-sense.
and now they are saying the Biden seemed to have disagreed with someone else calling us terrorist.
If this wasn't such a pathetic pile of shit, it would be funny.
He did that publicly where..exactly?
I'm sure "Unnamed Source" is always a reliable source of information.
Which is why you will see me linking stuff Republicans say from now on..that's attributed to "Unnamed Source" and I will have you unquestioningly believe it without challenge.
Right?![]()
Sure....twice for that matter.
So now you are comparing Obama to Bush....
You do realize that you are comparing Obama to what many believe is "the worst president in the history of our country"
That is like saying "my car is the best made in history....and if you think otherwise, remember how bad the pacer was....it is just like that".
What crime was Obama convicted of?
What could happen for 200 alex.
so let me see if I got this;
People call big 0 a kenyan and a socialist.
so that makes it OK for Biden to call Americans that disagree with him, terrorist.
This must be more of that "Fairness doctrine" non-sense.
and now they are saying the Biden seemed to have disagreed with someone else calling us terrorist.
If this wasn't such a pathetic pile of shit, it would be funny.
He did that publicly where..exactly?
I'm sure "Unnamed Source" is always a reliable source of information.
Which is why you will see me linking stuff Republicans say from now on..that's attributed to "Unnamed Source" and I will have you unquestioningly believe it without challenge.
Right?![]()
The point that Biden saying it is not even a FACT is sailing wide and to the right of a lot of people, it seems like. I guess heresay is how they like their facts served.
Gosh, how many outraged righties have used terms like "boy, muslim, terrorist, negro, etc." during Obama's tenure? It's fucking hilarious that NOW their panties are sandy because they are called out as the terrorists they are.
WHAAAAAAAA!!! WHAAAAAAAAAA, you fucking crybabies.
Obama let you know how stupid it is to cry foul despite your rhetoric since 2008. Deal with it.
please...tell me.....of the 33% of the people that are deemed right of center...or 100 million....how many have called him "boy, muslim, terrorist, negro, etc."
Sure...you will show me a sign here and a video there.....100 freaking million and exactly how many examples can you come up with?
Easy to say, quite difficult to back up.
He did that publicly where..exactly?
I'm sure "Unnamed Source" is always a reliable source of information.
Which is why you will see me linking stuff Republicans say from now on..that's attributed to "Unnamed Source" and I will have you unquestioningly believe it without challenge.
Right?![]()
The point that Biden saying it is not even a FACT is sailing wide and to the right of a lot of people, it seems like. I guess heresay is how they like their facts served.
Exactly where did I say Biden said it?
It was said at a forum where Biden was in the forefront, and a demcoratic rep said it and biden did not respond....and neither did the "leader of the free world"
so let me see if I got this;
People call big 0 a kenyan and a socialist.
so that makes it OK for Biden to call Americans that disagree with him, terrorist.
This must be more of that "Fairness doctrine" non-sense.
and now they are saying the Biden seemed to have disagreed with someone else calling us terrorist.
If this wasn't such a pathetic pile of shit, it would be funny.
He did that publicly where..exactly?
I'm sure "Unnamed Source" is always a reliable source of information.
Which is why you will see me linking stuff Republicans say from now on..that's attributed to "Unnamed Source" and I will have you unquestioningly believe it without challenge.
Right?![]()
The point that Biden saying it is not even a FACT is sailing wide and to the right of a lot of people, it seems like. I guess heresay is how they like their facts served.
The point that Biden saying it is not even a FACT is sailing wide and to the right of a lot of people, it seems like. I guess heresay is how they like their facts served.
Exactly where did I say Biden said it?
It was said at a forum where Biden was in the forefront, and a demcoratic rep said it and biden did not respond....and neither did the "leader of the free world"
And when a dissenter threw a shoe at Bush....all Bush said was "it is great that he had the right to do it"
THAT is the sign of a leader.
Obama...when a dissenter expresses verbal anger (not even physical)....nowhere did he comp-liment the man for speaking his mind...insead he said "but...but....but.....they are calling me names....."
That is NOT the sign of a leader.
Gosh, how many outraged righties have used terms like "boy, muslim, terrorist, negro, etc." during Obama's tenure? It's fucking hilarious that NOW their panties are sandy because they are called out as the terrorists they are.
WHAAAAAAAA!!! WHAAAAAAAAAA, you fucking crybabies.
Obama let you know how stupid it is to cry foul despite your rhetoric since 2008. Deal with it.
please...tell me.....of the 33% of the people that are deemed right of center...or 100 million....how many have called him "boy, muslim, terrorist, negro, etc."
Sure...you will show me a sign here and a video there.....100 freaking million and exactly how many examples can you come up with?
Easy to say, quite difficult to back up.
Nice strawman, pokey. Not only do you try to blow a population out of a sample but you are trying to disregard the FACT of right wing rhetoric by, first admitting to it, and then assuming it doesn't apply to anyone else who feels the same way but was never caught on camera saying it.
you people are sad. Like, Robert Smith of The Cure sad.
Tell you what.
Link something that she publicly came out and made an issue of that.
There's no "hole" here.
Democrats seldom go after an opponent personally.
Republicans do it all the time.
Sarah Palin - ****, stupid ****
GWB - hates black people, murderer, liar, traitor, stupid,etc
Tea Party - racists, terrorists
Michele Bachmann - nut-case, religious extremist, stupid
Herman Cain - uncle tom, house-negro, racist
Allen West - criminal
Dick Cheney - EVILE, criminal
Condi Rice - oreo, house-negro
Clarence Thomas - sex-offender, uncle tom, house-negro
Glenn Beck - cry-baby, nut-case, drunk
Rush Limbaugh - racist, heroin-addict
Mitt Romney - Mormon
Gerald Ford - clutz, stupid
Ronald Reagan - racist, stupid, war-monger
Fox News - faux news
The list goes on and on.
I'm trying to figure out what planet you're on.
And still no links.
Impressive.![]()
The point that Biden saying it is not even a FACT is sailing wide and to the right of a lot of people, it seems like. I guess heresay is how they like their facts served.
Exactly where did I say Biden said it?
It was said at a forum where Biden was in the forefront, and a demcoratic rep said it and biden did not respond....and neither did the "leader of the free world"
And when a dissenter threw a shoe at Bush....all Bush said was "it is great that he had the right to do it"
THAT is the sign of a leader.
Obama...when a dissenter expresses verbal anger (not even physical)....nowhere did he comp-liment the man for speaking his mind...insead he said "but...but....but.....they are calling me names....."
That is NOT the sign of a leader.