Merrick Garland has proven one of most extreme leftwing AG's in history, right up there with Eric Holder. Recall last year when Garland went after parents complaining about CRT
Citing an increase in harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against school board members, teachers and workers in our nation’s public schools, today Attorney General Merrick B. Garland directed the FBI and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices to meet in the next 30 days with federal, state, Tribal, territorial and local law enforcement leaders to discuss strategies for addressing this disturbing trend.
www.justice.gov
And today, we have a blatant terrorist organization, the leftwing violent extremist Jane's Revenge which has burned or vandalized 23 Pro-life women's pregnancy centers across the country and has promised more violence. Catholic leaders have PLEADED with Garland to please take action against these thugs, yet he has remained silent and done nothing.
www.eurasiareview.com
Leftwingers are whining about Kavanaugh and Gorsuch for their non-lies about honoring stare decisis during their confirmation hearings. But if you recall, 0bama, the Democrats and their media LIED in 2016 about Garland. He was presented as a moderate, a centrist. The left, (just looking out for Republicans' welfare you know) recommended we take him because when Hillary wins, as she was certain to do, she would appoint far more leftwing justices. Katie Couric, then at Yahoo was pushing Republicans to take him. So was NPR:
But after the final presidential debate and, given the strong possibility that Hillary Clinton wins the presidency — unless something drastic happens — is this continued refusal to act on the Garland nomination a smart move for conservatives? After all, Garland is seen as a judicial moderate, and Clinton has not committed to renominating him if she wins.
There's a case to be made that if the GOP wants to salvage the most conservative possible Supreme Court in a year that could see not only a Clinton presidential win but a Democratic takeover of the Senate, it should consider Garland.
www.npr.org
Thank goodness, McConnell didn't take the bait and give the simpering little Communist midget a hearing. He was a Trojan Horse. The left LIED about him.
Citing an increase in harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against school board members, teachers and workers in our nation’s public schools, today Attorney General Merrick B. Garland directed the FBI and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices to meet in the next 30 days with federal, state, Tribal, territorial and local law enforcement leaders to discuss strategies for addressing this disturbing trend.
Justice Department Addresses Violent Threats Against School Officials and Teachers
Citing an increase in harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against school board members, teachers and workers in our nation’s public schools, today Attorney General Merrick B. Garland directed the FBI and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices to meet in the next 30 days with federal, state...
And today, we have a blatant terrorist organization, the leftwing violent extremist Jane's Revenge which has burned or vandalized 23 Pro-life women's pregnancy centers across the country and has promised more violence. Catholic leaders have PLEADED with Garland to please take action against these thugs, yet he has remained silent and done nothing.
Garland Asked To Move On Jane’s Revenge – OpEd
Dear Attorney General Garland: As president of the nation's largest Catholic civil rights organization, I am requesting that you immediately deploy the full resources of the Department of Justice to apprehend and prosecute domestic terrorists who have recently attacked Catholic individuals...
www.eurasiareview.com
Leftwingers are whining about Kavanaugh and Gorsuch for their non-lies about honoring stare decisis during their confirmation hearings. But if you recall, 0bama, the Democrats and their media LIED in 2016 about Garland. He was presented as a moderate, a centrist. The left, (just looking out for Republicans' welfare you know) recommended we take him because when Hillary wins, as she was certain to do, she would appoint far more leftwing justices. Katie Couric, then at Yahoo was pushing Republicans to take him. So was NPR:
But after the final presidential debate and, given the strong possibility that Hillary Clinton wins the presidency — unless something drastic happens — is this continued refusal to act on the Garland nomination a smart move for conservatives? After all, Garland is seen as a judicial moderate, and Clinton has not committed to renominating him if she wins.
There's a case to be made that if the GOP wants to salvage the most conservative possible Supreme Court in a year that could see not only a Clinton presidential win but a Democratic takeover of the Senate, it should consider Garland.
The Case For Republicans To Consider Merrick Garland's Nomination
Senate GOP leadership has refused to hold hearings or a vote on the moderate judge's nomination. Yet, with the prospect of a Clinton presidency, might conservatives be having second thoughts?
www.npr.org
Thank goodness, McConnell didn't take the bait and give the simpering little Communist midget a hearing. He was a Trojan Horse. The left LIED about him.
