Neither the riots nor the Bundy situation fits the definition of civil disobedience. Only a very dishonest partisan or desperate one not educated enough to know definitions of the terms being used would make such claims. No academic source defines civil disobedience the way you are trying to define it. You are just parroting some rw talk show persons talking point that was made to fool suckers like you.Yeah ferguson, Baltimore, Chicago.What they are doing IS NOT civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is when protesters invite arrest and are will to pay the consequences of breaking the law. The Bundy terrorists have vowed violence if law enforcement tries to arrest them. That is a key factor of differentiating them as terrorist instead of practitioners of civil disobedience.Of course. Rioting is illegal and that's why so many were arrested.so when the next riot hits, I can dig up insults from another country and you will support it.
Do you support the Bundy bird refuge takeover?
It's civil disobedience. I thought Libs supported civil disobedience.