...
If noise is an issue, the Swiss could regulate in some form, on the basis of noise disturbing the public without banning minarets.
Well they had a referendum, and the people decided.
They are quite avid bell ringers, btw. But then it is a Christian nation.
God bless them.
Sometimes, what "the people" decide, isn't always a good thing - there's the danger of "tyranny of the majority" (for example popular referendums that restrict the civili rights of certain groups). Apparently, the decision is quite contentious with conflicting opinions, and also - whether it's really about minarets or a broader unease with Islamic immigrants.
The Real Reasons Why the Swiss Voted to Ban Minarets
The surprising vote reveals rather a growing unease in Switzerland, which traditionally has been one of the most open and most tolerant countries of the continent: Many Swiss are worried about the rise of political Islam and religious rules in Europe that are threatening hard-won rights such as equal rights for women and men, the secular rule of law above religion or the right of each individual to decide for him — or herself.
Swiss ban on minarets draws widespread condemnation
Muslim leaders from around the world, senior church figures, European politicians and human rights experts have deplored Switzerland's decision to ban the building of minarets.
The polarising verdict in a Swiss referendum held yesterday raised fundamental questions about discrimination and freedom of religion, with the Swiss government itself doubtful over whether the popular vote could be translated into national law, as required by the country's system of direct democracy.
"Scandalous," said the French foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner, while Babacar Ba, a senior official of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, warned of an "upsurge in Islamophobia" in Europe.
But far right leaders in Europe applauded the Swiss vote and called for parallel prohibitions in other countries.
"The flag of a courageous Switzerland which wants to remain Christian is flying over a near-Islamised Europe," said Mario Borghezio, an MEP from Italy's anti-immigrant Northern League.
In the Netherlands, the anti-Muslim Freedom party of Geert Wilders, which is steadily growing in popularity, called for a similar vote for the Dutch. "It's the first time that people in Europe have stood up to a form of Islamisation," it declared.
Despite Swiss fears of a violent backlash in the Islamic world and business fears of an adverse impact on Arab spending in Geneva and Zurich, as well as exports to the Middle East, Muslim leaders reacted mostly with sorrow. "The main thing is to keep calm and to realise how much work still needs to be done to defend basic freedoms," said Ba, the OIC ambassador in Geneva."We must do this by taking a constructive part in the debate on all issues which cause fear and concern, and to try to bring people together in order to confront extremism."
I can understand banning the burka - it's not a religious symbol, it's not even called for in Islam, it's a cultural artifact. But it does seem that banning minarets is a blow at religious freedom from a country that is not some third world country with no human rights or religious freedom.