Swalwell Subjected to Late Hit Smear

I've made it clear in many previous posts that I believe that EVERY politician has some corruption in their agenda.

There are many teacher I know and that you know too, that are not corrupt, and truly care about teaching children. No Corruption needed to have a pleasant and successful career.

Politicians, NOT so much. I don't believe a Politician can be corruption free and still keep their job.
Then you are politically irrelevant, just as a school principal would be educationally irrelevant if he believed that all teachers are corrupt and don't care about teaching children. He would just whine all day and never try to pick better teachers. The children and the taxpayers would get no benefit from such a principal. He would be a waste of oxygen and just take up desk space.
 
Then you are politically irrelevant, just as a school principal would be educationally irrelevant if he did believe that all teachers are corrupt and don't care about teaching children. He would just whine all day and never try to pick better teachers.
I think we need to be clear on the term corruption.

I don't understand it in this context.....otherwise.....we are in lala land.
 
ust as a school principal would be educationally irrelevant if he did believe that all teachers are corrupt and don't care about teaching children. He would just whine all day and never try to pick better teachers.
What?

That's NOT the case in school teachers.
Teachers do CARE about teaching children.
You are a teacher, are you corrupt.
Do you see corruption among your colleagues?

Teachers have evaluations and are held accountable.
Politicians are corrupt, and are NOT held accountable.
Politicians are protected.......even when they are exposed.
If a teacher did commit an act of corruption, they lose their job.
This ^^^^^ has happened when corruption is actually discovered.
 
I think we need to be clear on the term corruption.

I don't understand it in this context.....otherwise.....we are in lala land.
I was responding to Winco and I meant whatever he was referring to as corruption in the context of teachers.

But if you're asking me as a teacher how a teacher can be corrupt, it ranges from not really caring about the students and just being in the job for the summer vacations, to cheating on standardized testing or other malfeasance to look good as a teacher, being more concerned with climing the latter to principal or superintendent than with ecuastion, all the way to actually abusing and exploiting the children in their care. A minority of teachers (I hope) are guilty of these types of corruption.

If a principal believed that ALL teachers were corrupt like that, that principal would not be effective in weeding out the ones who are.
 
I think we need to be clear on the term corruption.
It's pretty clear.

Politicians are supposed to work for their constituents.
They often don't, and their 'promises' are influenced by MONEY.
It's pretty much a FACT that ALL politicians have their NET WORTH increase exponentially while in office.
 
What?

That's NOT the case in school teachers.
Teachers do CARE about teaching children.
You are a teacher, are you corrupt.
Do you see corruption among your colleagues?

Teachers have evaluations and are held accountable.
Politicians are corrupt, and are NOT held accountable.
Politicians are protected.......even when they are exposed.
If a teacher did commit an act of corruption, they lose their job.
This ^^^^^ has happened when corruption is actually discovered.
Yes, I have unfortunately seen among my fellow teachers some of the types of corruption I listed above. Rarely, thank Allah, but I do not work in an inner city school district where it is much, much more common.

Again, a principal or superintendent who assumed that all teachers are corrupt would not be effective at rooting out real corruption.

The reason that corrupt teachers lose their jobs is due to principals who recognize that not all teachers are corrupt.

Are a larger percent of politicians corrupt than teachers? No doubt. Does the political system foster corruption more so than the educational system? For sure.

But giving up and becoming a constant complainer is not the solution.
 
Last edited:
Politicians are supposed to work for their constituents.
They represent the interests of the people they represent as they do the work of the governmental body they are eleccted to.

The way you phrase it, every constituentcy is a special interest group.

I reject that notion.
 
to cheating on standardized testing or other malfeasance to look good as a teacher, being more concerned with climing the latter to principal or superintendent than with ecuastion,
Latter? You mean Ladder.
Ecuastion? Wow.
Climing? Has a b.....as in Climbing.

Well done teach.
 
It's pretty much a FACT that ALL politicians have their NET WORTH increase exponentially while in office.
At the federal level......

And we want to put them in charge of health care.

Look at the morons we send to congress.

Some (Blumenthall, AOC, the squad) are true pieces of work
 
At the federal level......

And we want to put them in charge of health care.

Look at the morons we send to congress.

Some (Blumenthall, AOC, the squad) are true pieces of work
Are you excluding (R) in your corruption list for a reason?
 
This is officially the 10th.. .10th.. thread on this topic. You guys are literally nuts.

Trump and crew rape women indiscriminately and without repercussions and you’ll all jerk off in a sock when democrats react swiftly to sexual impropriety charges.
 
Are you excluding (R) in your corruption list for a reason?
No. You want some R's.

MTG ==> NEVER liked her.

Boebert ==> Super loud mouth...and a moron

Thune ==> Has become a total loser

BTW: Still not sure what you mean by corruption.

These are terrible politicians who don't understand their jobs.

Harry Ried/Nancy Pelosi/Rick Scott/Mitch McConnell.......all big money people.

Diane Feinstein got superwealthy while a senator.

In Feinstein's case....I actually thought she was a good person....but she still got wealthy.
 
This is officially the 10th.. .10th.. thread on this topic. You guys are literally nuts.

Trump and crew rape women indiscriminately and without repercussions and you’ll all jerk off in a sock when democrats react swiftly to sexual impropriety charges.
If you check the dates, you will see that this is the 1st thread on the topic.
 
I think it should be a priority for BOTH parties to support their BEST people and expose their worst people.
You know, do what is BEST for ALL Americans.


Hiring and Supporting Loyalists is NOT best for America.

McMahon......Not Qualified....eg...A1 comment.
RFK...... A Herion addict worm brain.....Not qualified to lead the Health Dept.
Kegseth...... An underperforming Major, a FOX News host...Leading the Pentagon.

Congress Members like Swalwell should be called out and exposed.
Congress Members like Roy Moore should be called out and exposed.
Congress Members like Jim Jordan should be called out and exposed.
"Herion?" Is that a type of bird?
 
//Looks like Swallwell got taken out by dirty D to save chance at CA GOV? Election now infected by some of dblack hogwash apparently. The filthy media & D did not suddenly grow morals, nor did phony MiddlerMacStain Mac1958//

The upcoming June 2 California gubernatorial primary is not like other primaries. Instead of one Democrat primary winner and one Republican primary winner facing off in the general election, the top two vote-getters advance to the general election… regardless of party. Now go and look at the polls. As you can see, there’s a very real chance two Republicans could win the primary, which would ensure a Republican becomes governor of California.


The media and Democrats cannot allow that possibility, so it’s been decided that Swalwell must be sacrificed. His sacrifice will break the three-way tie between the three top Democrats — Swalwell, Katie Porter, and Tom Steyer — and once Swalwell’s 15 percent support moves to the other two, one or both is certain to go on to compete in the general election, which practically ensures Democrats hold onto California’s governor’s seat.

You see, if Swalwell were polling at 30 percent instead of his current 15 percent, the media cover-up of these allegations would continue because no one would be sweating a Republican sneaking into victory.
That’s it in a nutshell.

 
15th post
I am no fan of Fang Fang's boy, but unfair is unfair.


This is not even an accusation, just a prediction by a left-wing activist that women will come forward to accuse him. Hiw would an innocent man even begin to respond without looking guilty?

I see Katy Porter's fingerprints on this, but I have no proof.
So you aren't aligned with #BelieveAllWomen anymore?
 
If you check the dates, you will see that this is the 1st thread on the topic.
You started 2 of them. There are a few more without “Swalwell” in the title besides these. But there are a lot of threads. That’s all I’m saying.

IMG_1064.webp
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom