Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dems can't muster the votes in congress or support of the American people to change the laws they disagree with. So they SCAM their way around the law with activist judges, flat out ignore the law, fabricate their own unconstitutional laws, weaponize the courts and conduct WITCH HUNTS on their political opponents. Dems are pissed that we have a SCOTUS that can overrule ALL of that shit!Nearly every win that the left has had, in my lifetime, has come from activist judges.
Give us an example where the SC did not follow the law and Constitution.What is your take on SC's behavior here?
Give us an example where the SC did not follow the law and Constitution.
of course I do, and why I listen to all sides of a topic and come to my own conclusion instead of living in an echo chamber where I am attacked for having a mind of my own and not agreeing with the cult,,Do you have your own head to make your own arguments?
Seriously, can even a single right winger post something half way intelligent in here?
You again make the accusation without a single example to back it up. Your new screen name is DemPropaganda.It's not illegal, or against any specific law for SC to be a partisan rag, blantly thumbing the scales of justice for a fellow Republican by proceedural actions. In fact even if it was unconstitutional there would be no legal recourse to the highest court of land. they have the last word.
Whats your point? That it's all good?
Funny how the entire media establishment spews same line on every story and libs lap it up without question but they are the smart ones oohhhhh yessssLike I said...
Conservative SC majority is now shedding any pretence still left to partisan impartiality.
Trump has little to stand on in his criminal trials, so his only end game is delaying them long enough to again make it to the White House and put himself above the law.
Nobody seriously thinks SC is going to grant Trump immunity, nobody thinks they will overturn iron-clad lower court ruling....but we have a Supreme Court that seems to be willing to use that excuse to play along and halt Trump's criminal trials for months, making it near impossible from them to complete before election.
It's been 135 days since Jack Smith asked the court to expedite descision on immunuty...nope! They insist on taking no less than 5 months to settle an obvious no-brainer outcome.
Even if there was some argument about how busy they are or how complex of case this is, they still didn't have to do it this way. SC could have simply allowed the trials to go on, while they square away these go-nowhere immunity claims.
In Taking Up Trump’s Immunity Claim, Supreme Court Bolstered His Delay Strategy
By scheduling a hearing for late April on the former president’s assertion that he cannot be prosecuted for his actions in office, the justices increased the chances that he will not face trial by Election Day.www.nytimes.com
We knew Thomas was an unrepentant Trumptard and Alito is not far behind, but for the rest to go along with this ridiculous shit?
This marks a whole new low for Supreme Court, whole new level of partisanship and this is not going to end well.
Remember the 'Journolist'? Hundreds of them caught red handed conspiring to spew the same narrative. Democrats CORRUPT everything they touch.Funny how the entire media establishment spews same line on every story and libs lap it up without question but they are the smart ones oohhhhh yessss
Look at the little guy make stuff up to soothe himselfFunny how the entire media establishment spews same line on every story and libs lap it up without question but they are the smart ones oohhhhh yessss
Just the facts....sing along now with your fellow idiotsLook at the little guy make stuff up to soothe himself
So it took the government 40 years without ANY complaints or victims to pursue this?Yes, Trump couldn't be prosecuted for paying off his fuck dolls during a campaign if he didn't run and didn't pay them off.
Yes, he wouldn't have his disgruntled lawyer testifying to the world about how Trumps run their bussiness fraudlently.
Yes, if Trump wasn't a president he wouldn't be slandering Caroll.
Yes, if Trump wasn't a president he wouldn't be able to take home top secret documents and then refuse to return them.
Yes, if Trump didn't run and lose and election he wouldn't be able to incite an attack on the Congress.
So what? Are we to pretend that none of it happened? Do try to post something coherent.
Hm. You sound a bit upset.
Your use of the “thumb on the scale“ metaphor is supremely ironic, no pun intended. With these idiotic prosecutions, the Democratic operatives who George Soros’d their way into being officers of the court are not trying to “put their thumb on the scale.” No, they are trying to sit an elephant on the scale.
What could be more anti democratic than the party in power arresting and trying to imprison the front runner of the dissenting party?
What if Trump was using the DOJ to prosecute Biden. Would you want the current SC to take up the case?Why wouldn't I be upset?
By SC putting their thumb on the scale so blatantly it is undermining it's legitimacy, undermining the very foundation of the third branch of our governing that is supposed be at least somewhat isolated from partisan politics.
This is true when it comes to Trump who I obviously think is an abject piece of shit, but I wouldn't be also concerned if this a was piece of shit Democrat trying to weasel his way out of criminal cases and a lefty court was playing along this blatantly.
Can ya give us any examples of said concern ...... establish some cred so we know ya arent slinging BSWhy wouldn't I be upset?
By SC putting their thumb on the scale so blatantly it is undermining it's legitimacy, undermining the very foundation of the third branch of our governing that is supposed be at least somewhat isolated from partisan politics.
This is true when it comes to Trump who I obviously think is an abject piece of shit, but I also would be concerned if this a was piece of shit Democrat trying to weasel his way out of criminal cases with lefty court was playing along this blatantly.
Think twice, because the preceedent here is very corosive to our democracy and just may cut the other way down the line.
Can ya give us any examples of said concern ...... establish some cred so we know ya arent slinging BS
