Supreme Court Refuses To Hear trump's Sanctuary City Lawsuit

[Dana7360]

trump loses again.

Freedom and what America stands for and what we are built on wins.

One of the funniest things about it, both of trump's appointees to the court voted to not hear the case. Which allows the lower court ruling to stand.

trump can't persecute states or cities that don't follow his demands.

Supreme Court won't hear Trump administration challenge to California's immigrant 'sanctuary' law

The case could have determined whether state and local governments can give sanctuary to undocumented immigrants threatened with arrest or deportation

www.freep.com

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Happy day for Dimocrats who do not believe in our immigration laws.

 

[whitehall]

The Court didn't rule against the President, they merely chickened out.

 

[miketx]

Shameful to allow scum filled democrat cities to protect criminals.

 

[Rambunctious]

The existence of these stupid and dangerous sanctuary cities will actually help Trump in the election....so if you think this is a bad thing for Trump you are wrong...but it is bad for the nation and 75% of the nations agrees with that....

 

[TNHarley]

There are other ways to go after them.
Fuck illegals and their harborers.

 

[Penelope]

It was like ruling against him and his attorneys.

When Giuliani was mayor of NY City he stuck up for the illegal immigrants.

 

[Claudette]

trump loses again.

Freedom and what America stands for and what we are built on wins.

One of the funniest things about it, both of trump's appointees to the court voted to not hear the case. Which allows the lower court ruling to stand.

trump can't persecute states or cities that don't follow his demands.

Supreme Court won't hear Trump administration challenge to California's immigrant 'sanctuary' law

The case could have determined whether state and local governments can give sanctuary to undocumented immigrants threatened with arrest or deportation

www.freep.com

They aren't his demands dumbass. They are state and Federal law. You sure are stupid.

 

[ColtMadeMenEqual]

trump loses again.

Freedom and what America stands for and what we are built on wins.

One of the funniest things about it, both of trump's appointees to the court voted to not hear the case. Which allows the lower court ruling to stand.

trump can't persecute states or cities that don't follow his demands.

Supreme Court won't hear Trump administration challenge to California's immigrant 'sanctuary' law

The case could have determined whether state and local governments can give sanctuary to undocumented immigrants threatened with arrest or deportation

www.freep.com

What's funny is you have been hoisted by your own petard and are too stupid to even see it.

For YEARS now all we've heard is "Trump just appointed two stooges to the SCOTUS" but this is several cases now where one or both of them have voted either against the Administration itself OR against what would be considered the conservative opinion, something that none of Obama's appointees EVER did or EVER will do. Kagan , for example, she'll never be a surprises vote.

Proving that leftists are authoritarian fucksticks .

 

[Asclepias]

This year is turning out to be a disaster for the incompetent fuck up in the white house.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“Supreme Court Refuses To Hear trump's Sanctuary City Lawsuit”

And appropriately so.

That the Federal government cannot compel states and local jurisdictions to enforce Federal law is settled, accepted, and beyond dispute.

As a consequence, there is no such thing as a ‘sanctuary city.’

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Bad Jokes "

* Contradictory Except To Traitors *

Freedom and what America stands for and what we are built on wins.

So do you mean that removing the autonomy of us citizens to determine who they accept as citizens and who they allow as immigrants is a win for americans ?

 

[Asclepias]

" Bad Jokes "

* Contradictory Except To Traitors *

Freedom and what America stands for and what we are built on wins.

So do you mean that removing the autonomy of us citizens to determine who they accept as citizens and who they allow as immigrants is a win for americans ?

Yes. It leaves the decision with the states.

 

[airplanemechanic]

This year is turning out to be a disaster for the incompetent fuck up in the white house.

I thought Trumps' 2 appointees would rule in his favor 100% of the time, ya know, like the 4 liberal judges did for Obama?

 

[Rambunctious]

" Bad Jokes "

* Contradictory Except To Traitors *

Freedom and what America stands for and what we are built on wins.

So do you mean that removing the autonomy of us citizens to determine who they accept as citizens and who they allow as immigrants is a win for americans ?

Yes. It leaves the decision with the states.

Yep and watch the blue states turn red......

 

[miketx]

This year is turning out to be a disaster for the incompetent fuck up in the white house.

Not really. more blacks have been killed that ever before since he was elected. He could run on that alone.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

" Bad Jokes "

* Contradictory Except To Traitors *

Freedom and what America stands for and what we are built on wins.

So do you mean that removing the autonomy of us citizens to determine who they accept as citizens and who they allow as immigrants is a win for americans ?

Yes. It leaves the decision with the states.

There was a time when conservatives believed in “states’ rights” – such is the hypocrisy of the right.

 

[Asclepias]

This year is turning out to be a disaster for the incompetent fuck up in the white house.

I thought Trumps' 2 appointees would rule in his favor 100% of the time, ya know, like the 4 liberal judges did for Obama?

I did too. However, it appears that they even know Drumpf is a fuckup.

 

[ColtMadeMenEqual]

“Supreme Court Refuses To Hear trump's Sanctuary City Lawsuit”

And appropriately so.

That the Federal government cannot compel states and local jurisdictions to enforce Federal law is settled, accepted, and beyond dispute.

As a consequence, there is no such thing as a ‘sanctuary city.’

This is,, of course, false

National speed limits and DUI limits PROVE that the USG has certain levers they can pull to force states to comply with federal law.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

As a consequence, there is no such thing as a ‘sanctuary city.’

That's moronic. Regardless of what the cowardly Supreme Court does or says states like California still
are proud of the fact that they ignore federal immigration law and act to keep law enforcement off the wet backs of illegal immigrants once they get to the tarnished yellow state of California.

That's sanctuary policy and it occurs in many leftist locations as they give the finger to US immigration policy.