Supreme Court Refuses To Hear trump's Sanctuary City Lawsuit

‘There is much confusion about the term “sanctuary city.” The term is often used derisively by immigration opponents to blast what are best described as community policing policies. Critics claim that these cities and states provide “sanctuary” to undocumented immigrants, but research shows that the opposite is true. In fact, community policing policies are about providing public safety services, not sanctuary, to both immigrant residents and the entire community. Crime experts, including hundreds of local police officers, have found that cities with community policing policies continue to work closely with DHS and have built bridges to immigrant communities that have improved their ability to fight crime and protect the entire community.’


And the Supreme Court today acknowledged the fact that ‘sanctuary cities’ are indeed a myth, the issue not worthy for review.
 
As a political aside…

This could be the Court signaling that it doesn’t believe Trump will be reelected, allowing the new administration next January to address the issue – or not.

And indeed, the new administration next January likely won’t pursue the matter, rendering the issue moot.
 
As a political aside…

This could be the Court signaling that it doesn’t believe Trump will be reelected, allowing the new administration next January to address the issue – or not.

And indeed, the new administration next January likely won’t pursue the matter, rendering the issue moot.

Interesting take on the supreme court. Especially after Trumps first USSC appointment, Neil Gorsich wrote the LGBTQ decision.
 
Gorsuch is starting to look like a complete bust.
The vetting for this guy was a failure.
Yesterday was a disaster for SCOTUS decisions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top