Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Thomas is a textualist who believes in a strict and ridged interpretation of the Constitution- a philosophy not widely shared among constitutional scholars He believes that the only rights that exist are the enumerated rights, a view which flies in the face of two hundred years of case law and precedents. But you bigots who do not know jack shit about Constitutional law pounce on this as though it was the only truth. Far from it"Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said Monday that Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court case that mandated all states recognize same-sex marriages, is "found nowhere in the text" of the Constitution and threatens "the religious liberty of the many Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred institution between one man and one woman."
I suppose that I did miss that. Did you say that you believe that they have the right to legal marriage? If so , why are you plastering all of this shit from Clearance Thomas all over the thread?You (and every triggered snowflake on this board) must have missed my post where I said I don't care if state / federal governments give same sex couples the same rights and benefits as heterosexual couples,
I asked you a question! Do you or do you not support LEGAL, same sex MARRIAGE. If you do , why the shameless promotion of Thomas' viepoint?At least you admit it.
I agree with you on this one.
Liberals are not satisfied with this, though. They (seem to) want to force others to accept Same-Sex UNIONS as MARRIAGES, complete with the Christian connotations / inferences of a union of 2 people blessed by God. Since God is opposed to homosexuality this is a huge problem for many in the country, causing huge opposition.
I personally don't care if 2 peoe of the same sex get together, spend their whole lives together, and have every legal benefit as heterosexual married couples.
I have a problem when the govt steps in and attempts to tell someone they must violate their religeous beliefs to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple or conduct abortions.
The courts made the right, legal decisions.
- There are other bakeries willing to give you what you want. Go to one of them.
- There are other doctors and hospitals that perform abortions - go to one of them.
Abortion is violence.
A 3 week old fetus is not viable outside of the wombKilling viable babies capable of surviving outside the womb is violence ... and murder. Fact.
The death cult kills babies in the womb older than 3 weeks, as you know, and they are pushing for abortions through the entire pregnancy, right up until the moment of birth.A 3 week old fetus is not viable outside of the womb
Less than 1% of abortions occur after 21 weeks. The vast majority of abortions occur before the fetus is viable outside of the wombThe death cult kills babies in the womb older than 3 weeks, as you know, and they are pushing for abortions through the entire pregnancy, right up until the moment of birth.
Hell, Obama and other Democrats initially supported killing babies fighting to survive outside the womb who had survived a failed abortion attempt.
Fail.
Good for you, but the death cult is still pushing for abortions at any time during the pregnancy.Less than 1% of abortions occur after 21 weeks. The vast majority of abortions occur before the fetus is viable outside of the womb
You want to ban ALL abortions even the ones that occur BEFORE the fetus is actually viable outside of the womb.
I have always said that viability outside the womb is the cutoff.
If the life of the mother is danger or in the case of a terminal fetal abnormality is the main reason for late term abortionsGood for you, but the death cult is still pushing for abortions at any time during the pregnancy.
Got any good explanation for that, other than the acceptable case of the mother's life being in jeopardy?
Still doesn't explain extremists trying to claim a fetus is not a baby until after it is completely outside the womb or arguing for the right to kill a baby outside the womb after a failed abortion based on the initial intent to abort the baby.If the life of the mother is danger or in the case of a terminal fetal abnormality is the main reason for late term abortions
Answer the questions! Are you a coward? Back up you bullshit!I answered you.
'Shameless promotion'?
Fuck you, snowflake.
Are you fucking stupid? Obviously you are.Answer the questions! Are you a coward? Back up you bullshit!
Where did you state unequivocally that you support LEGAL same sex MARRIAGE?Are you fucking stupid? Obviously you are.
I already answered the question, and calling posting the USSC' remarks on their decision is not 'shameless promotion' ...
...unless you're a snowflake who believes burning down churches, targeting Conservatives, threatening Justices, calling for violence against USSC Justices, and calling for actual insurrection just because you didn't get your way is justifiable.
So you base all you ranting on extremists and not what the reality of the situation isStill doesn't explain extremists trying to claim a fetus is not a baby until after it is completely outside the womb or arguing for the right to kill a baby outside the womb after a failed abortion based on the initial intent to abort the baby.
I don't think we, rational people, are that far off on agreeing about abortions but that it is the radical extremists on both sides causing the biggest divide / arguments.
