Supreme Court declines to hear case from couple that pointed guns at BLM protest

[horselightning]

Supreme Court declines to hear case from St. Louis couple that pointed guns at BLM protest

The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended Mark and Patricia McCloskey's law licenses in February.

www.axios.com

wow supreme court has gone racist. they had right to bear arms and protect them selves against these thugs. The courts does not give a shit about the constitution. If it were the other way around and it was black couple against white they would have gotten of with the second amendment.\ or a dem. It is only ok now for blacks to protect themselves but not whites or republicans.

 

[horselightning]

Justices won’t hear appeal from couple who pointed guns at Black Lives Matter protesters

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by a St. Louis couple whose law licenses were sanctioned after they pointed guns at Black Lives Matter protesters near their home in the summer of …

thehill.com

here is more

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Supreme Court declines to hear case from St. Louis couple that pointed guns at BLM protest

The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended Mark and Patricia McCloskey's law licenses in February.

www.axios.com

wow supreme court has gone racist. they had right to bear arms and protect them selves against these thugs. The courts does not give a shit about the constitution. If it were the other way around and it was black couple against white they would have gotten of with the second amendment.\ or a dem. It is only ok now for blacks to protect themselves but not whites or republicans.

Except the right to "defend" themselves is not the issue they wanted the SC to pick up. It was the suspension of their law licenses BASED on their brandishing of firearms that they wanted the SC to hear. And the SC said..NO!
But fear not, Wild Bill and Annie Oakley only need to serve a year's probation and they'll be back to practicing law..quite frankly a scary thought.

"The court stayed the suspension on the condition they serve a year's probation".

 

[horselightning]

Except the right to "defend" themselves is not the issue they wanted the SC to pick up. It was the suspension of their law licenses BASED on their brandishing of firearms that they wanted the SC to hear. And the SC said..NO!
But fear not, Wild Bill and Annie Oakley only need to serve a year's probation and they'll be back to practicing law..quite frankly a scary thought.

"The court stayed the suspension on the condition they serve a year's probation".

they did nothing wrong. the black thugs did. there suspension should have never happened.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

they did nothing wrong. the black thugs did.

The Missouri Supreme Court disagreed. But stayed the verdict on the condition that they be good citizens and keep their mouths closed for a year.
I'm guessing that's why the USSC didn't take the case. Because the couple wasn't permanently sanctioned.

 

[horselightning]

The Missouri Supreme Court disagreed. But stayed the verdict on the condition that they be good citizens and keep their mouths closed for a year.
I'm guessing that's why the USSC didn't take the case. Because the couple wasn't permanently sanctioned.

ooh. they didnt do anything wrong in the first place.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

ooh. they didnt do anything wrong in the first place.

Again, the Missouri Supreme Court disagreed.

 

[horselightning]

Again, the Missouri Supreme Court disagreed.

the governor is on their side. the supreme court is nothing but left wing idiots.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

the governor is on their side. the supreme court is nothing but left wing idiots.

The governor pardoned them. But that doesn't release them from the Missouri Supreme Court's decision.
They're lucky they didn't pull this in New York or California. They'd probably be sanctioned for a lot longer.

 

[theHawk]

Supreme Court declines to hear case from St. Louis couple that pointed guns at BLM protest

The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended Mark and Patricia McCloskey's law licenses in February.

www.axios.com

wow supreme court has gone racist. they had right to bear arms and protect them selves against these thugs. The courts does not give a shit about the constitution. If it were the other way around and it was black couple against white they would have gotten of with the second amendment.\ or a dem. It is only ok now for blacks to protect themselves but not whites or republicans.

Are you surprised? These cowards were afraid of BLM, that’s why Roberts wouldn’t take up any election fraud cases.

 

[horselightning]

Are you surprised? These cowards were afraid of BLM, that’s why Roberts wouldn’t take up any election fraud cases.

nope i been saying that all along. are legal system is so unjustly enfluenced because of blm.