Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Challenging EPA Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gases

[Weatherman2020]

They wouldn’t take it unless there was a good argument against it.

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Challenging EPA Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gases (Updated)

A surprising grant of certiorari places a high-stakes regulatory case on the Court's docket, with profound implications for EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gases.

reason.com

 

[pknopp]

Should be interesting. Hopefully they don't create some sort of extremely narrow ruling.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

They wouldn’t take it unless there was a good argument against it.

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Challenging EPA Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gases (Updated)

A surprising grant of certiorari places a high-stakes regulatory case on the Court's docket, with profound implications for EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gases.

reason.com

We need the SC to argue over hot air......................LOLOL

Eliminate DC and the planet would freeze with all that hot air gone.

 

[excalibur]

They wouldn’t take it unless there was a good argument against it.

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Challenging EPA Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gases (Updated)

A surprising grant of certiorari places a high-stakes regulatory case on the Court's docket, with profound implications for EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gases.

reason.com

The EPA has been out of control for decades now.

Hopefully, we get at least 5-Justices to smack them down and maybe reestablish the real meaning the Framers intended of the interstate commerce clause which the FDR Court expanded out of all reality.