In other words you have provided nothing that supports your claim. I could post the solution to a polynomial equation. Would that support my claim?
Show the relevance of these things to your claim that taxation doesn't reduce your spending power. Otherwise you're just blathering incoherently. You are obviously afraid to post the argument. That's why you keep telling me to go look it up. That's the sure sign of someone who knows he can't prove what he claims.
Of course I have something to support my claims. Unlike you, I constantly present evidence that supports my claims. I already posted it. That you are ignorant of the evidence is a personal problem.
And, you, on the other hand, never present anything but simple emotional opinions.
You haven't posted jack shit aside from a bunch of pseudo economic hocus-pocus which has nothing to do with the effect of taxation on your paycheck.
I, on the other hand, have posted the irrefutable fact that more net pay gives you more spending power and a higher standard of living than less net pay, and the result of higher taxes is less net pay.
Now, prove that syllogism wrong.
So far you're batting zero. In fact, you aren't even at bat. You ran away like a scared little puppy with his tail between his legs a long time ago.
You are still not saying anything useful. You haven't posted any irrefutable facts accept that you believe that your personal home economics is the same as macro economics.
The cause of higher standards of living is number of people employed and the efficiency of labor. Always has been, always will be.
Here are two proxies for efficiency
and here is the history of employment ratio.
And nobody but you is dumb enough to believe that more money in the money supply is going to magically make more stuff or result in a higher standard of living. Increasing the amount of money in paychecks won't make more stuff.
Or how about we just have the Fed double the money supply, then we can all go out and buy the twice as much stuff that somehow magically appeared. We can just all quit working, print money, and we will then have everything we want. Yeah, that's it. Really, how fin stupid can you be to believe that if everyone has more money, somehow, magically, there will be more stuff. I believe that may be the root of your problem, you are lazy and believe you can have food and shelter without having to work for it.
The reality is that no manner of increasing or decreasing taxes makes any long run matter because the amount of stuff that is available to consume is dependent direction on the efficiency of production and the number of people employed. The only time that increasing or decreasing net pay makes any difference is if 1) You are part of a smaller group that gets that, like lowering the tax rate on capital gains, or 2) in the short run if there is under employment.
And, the return on tax changes is minimal and nearly non existent which is why every time that a Republican President has lowered tax rates to stimulate the economy, like Reagan, they have shortly increases spending.
In fact, since Richard Nixon, the only three presidential terms which have seen a limiting to discretionary spending were G Bush I, Clinton, and Obama.
Nixon, Reagan, Carter, Ford, and G Bush II all presided over increases in spending. In fact, Bush II presided over the largest increase in discretionary spending.
Those are facts, a concept that seems to elude you. All you need to do is learn to count. Oh, that's right, you can only count to zero because that is your batting average.
