sun cycles, northern lights and climate change

You know you're quoting a biology website ... is that you're authority here? ...

Which satellite channel do we use as a proxy for temperature and pressure? ... here's the list ... yeah, satellites are real limited, if you want weather, you'll need weather balloons also ... not many biologists would know that ...

Doesn't matter which site I'm quoting, the study is a study that has been done, and the data is there for everyone to see.

The reality is that the people who think climate change isn't a thing, jumped on this research as evidence that global warming isn't happening. The person I replied to said it must be wrong because there's almost no precipitation in Antarctica.

Well, it increased over three years.
 
Doesn't matter which site I'm quoting, the study is a study that has been done, and the data is there for everyone to see.

The reality is that the people who think climate change isn't a thing, jumped on this research as evidence that global warming isn't happening. The person I replied to said it must be wrong because there's almost no precipitation in Antarctica.

Well, it increased over three years.

So what does three years data mean for the 100-year average? ...

I understand weather changes ... and I understand catastrophic weather ... climate is about the average over long time periods ... 100 years is bare minimum, better is a thousand year average ... I agree the Earth has warmed 1ºC over the past 100 years ... so what ... that doesn't change weather, it doesn't change weather averages, so it doesn't change climate ...

Antarctica is a Polar Desert ... that is because it is dry there, and has nothing to do with temperature ... and it will stay that way until Plate Tectonics moves her away from the pole ... 100 million years she'll be a tropical paradise ...
 
So what does three years data mean for the 100-year average? ...

I understand weather changes ... and I understand catastrophic weather ... climate is about the average over long time periods ... 100 years is bare minimum, better is a thousand year average ... I agree the Earth has warmed 1ºC over the past 100 years ... so what ... that doesn't change weather, it doesn't change weather averages, so it doesn't change climate ...

Antarctica is a Polar Desert ... that is because it is dry there, and has nothing to do with temperature ... and it will stay that way until Plate Tectonics moves her away from the pole ... 100 million years she'll be a tropical paradise ...

Well. Here's the point I'm making.

Some people saw that this was happening and said "global warming isn't happening, this proves it". I said "snow and ice come from precipitation, you can have cooler weather and still be below freezing so the precipitation turns to snow and ice, it doesn't prove global warming isn't happening".

This is what we're talking about.
 

"Most of the gains have already been attributed to an anomaly that saw increased precipitation (snow and some rain) fall over Antarctica,"

Even the study said it's from increased precipitation. Maybe you should do some research before telling people they don't know science.

And they can use satellites to check how much ice and snow there is and what the weather's doing.

The increase is still an increase the very opposite of the IPCC predictions......
 
What is a "sun cycle" ... [giggle] ...



Flat Earth Theory ... too funny ... but go ahead with the ad hominim attacks ... that proves you wrong every time ... we just laugh at you ... so immature ...
well you are right about one thing.....being smart......doesn't mean......you can.......always just......suck like you on a cranberry juice while you have your period all over my thread......why don't you **** off and not say anything else about my model? you can't understand it and its not my fault, its arrogant ******* losers like you who make it hard, you can go suck an egg you weasel.
 
ReinyDays what do you think? can you somehow not respond anymore? It would be much appreciated in further discussion I post if you weren't apart of it? I hope you can keep out? you have been disturbing for some time? Are you just gonna leave? it would probably be for the best since you can't control your dipshit ism?....but.....I guess.....You......will......abide? do you understand because I made a lot of points in a row between the words like you the smarter one!!! : )
 
The increase is still an increase the very opposite of the IPCC predictions



IPCC does nothing but fudge and lie.

Those claiming Antarctic ice is "melting" are really clueless science invalids.

First thing missing = liquid water, there ain't none

Second thing = ice cores prove AA adds a new layer of ice every year, how is that "melting?"
 
ReinyDays what do you think? can you somehow not respond anymore? It would be much appreciated in further discussion I post if you weren't apart of it? I hope you can keep out? you have been disturbing for some time? Are you just gonna leave? it would probably be for the best since you can't control your dipshit ism?....but.....I guess.....You......will......abide? do you understand because I made a lot of points in a row between the words like you the smarter one!!! : )

All you have are insults ... that's not a model ... it's childish ... try the creative writing thread instead ... everything in the OP is fiction, not science ... come back when you have something testable ...
 
Back
Top Bottom