sun cycles, northern lights and climate change

[Sunsettommy]

Denial of the obvious is the sign of the fearful and willfully ignorant. People like you fear science because you are too damned lazy to try to understand.

Your denial of the obvious is the sign of the fearful and willfully ignorant. People like you fear science because you are too damned lazy to try to understand.

 

[ReinyDays]

Your denial of the obvious is the sign of the fearful and willfully ignorant. People like you fear science because you are too damned lazy to try to understand.

One calls their own judgement ... one way or another ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Maybe it's you're reading skills are the problem ... try this:



This doesn't make any sense ... care to explain? ...

I no longer know what we're talking about.....could be transmitters and receivers......we are not communicating well......oh well : )

 

[ReinyDays]

I no longer know what we're talking about.....could be transmitters and receivers......we are not communicating well......oh well : )

That would be a problem on your side ... along with college science comes college English ...

Are your reading skill able to read the thread title ... "sun cycles, northern lights and climate change" ... are you admitting this is goobly-gook? ... now you're claiming you don't understand? ...

C'mon Bubba ... you can finish Middle School ... but you have to be able to read ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

That would be a problem on your side ... along with college science comes college English ...

Are your reading skill able to read the thread title ... "sun cycles, northern lights and climate change" ... are you admitting this is goobly-gook? ... now you're claiming you don't understand? ...

C'mon Bubba ... you can finish Middle School ... but you have to be able to read ...

neat all that you said was eye candy, then a whim of my title, then more eye candy, I don't respond to that well if you haven't noticed.

 

[ReinyDays]

neat all that you said was eye candy, then a whim of my title, then more eye candy, I don't respond to that well if you haven't noticed.

You don't respond at all ... just spewing nonsense ... and then claim you don't understand any discussion ... c'mon Bubba, your Middle School deserves better of you ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

You don't respond at all ... just spewing nonsense ... and then claim you don't understand any discussion ... c'mon Bubba, your Middle School deserves better of you ...

neat you must really enjoy your stink, welp when you want to have a serious discussion I'm listening

 

[EMH]

the break in the current ice age we are in

Try actually getting a clue about what an ICE AGE is before embarrassing yourself again...

Thread 'Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...'

Jun 23, 2023

What is an ICE AGE?

Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice retreats, as if "Day After Tomorrow" movie is accurate... LOL!!! What was North American Ice Age before 2010 is now spun into a series of rapid "ice ages" where it took a mere 75k years for the "ice age" to start in Northern Canada and put 2.5 mile thick glaicers on Chicago. This is "Milankovich"...

• EMH
• Replies: 338
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

 

[ReinyDays]

neat you must really enjoy your stink, welp when you want to have a serious discussion I'm listening

Sure ... what do you mean by "sun cycles"? ... we average out the 11-year solar cycle by using 100-year climate averages ... our Sun isn't known to have any other cycles ...

Just a reminder ... none of Earth's orbital cycles match up with glacial cycles ... no correlation ... therefore, no cause-and-effect ...

You brought these points up ... can you defend them? ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Sure ... what do you mean by "sun cycles"? ... we average out the 11-year solar cycle by using 100-year climate averages ... our Sun isn't known to have any other cycles ...

Just a reminder ... none of Earth's orbital cycles match up with glacial cycles ... no correlation ... therefore, no cause-and-effect ...

You brought these points up ... can you defend them? ...

can't say those things without a working model of the sun, try not to wow yourself with what you've read on that one, I don't want to hear it.

 

[ReinyDays]

can't say those things without a working model of the sun, try not to wow yourself with what you've read on that one, I don't want to hear it.

No discussion then ... why did you post this? ... we have a working model of the Sun ... Nuclear Reactions in the Sun ...

You're the one not communicating here ... you used the term "sun cycles" in your OP ... now explain yourself, or go back to the science forum and embarrass yourself there ...

ETA: You should answer SSDD's questions in post #28 ... I'll pop some popcorn ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

No discussion then ... why did you post this? ... we have a working model of the Sun ... Nuclear Reactions in the Sun ...

You're the one not communicating here ... you used the term "sun cycles" in your OP ... now explain yourself, or go back to the science forum and embarrass yourself there ...

ETA: You should answer SSDD's questions in post #28 ... I'll pop some popcorn ...

take it easy you must be leaking your eye candy impressiveness elsewhere too, is it just leaking out of you at all times? maybe since your mind doesn't allow stretching outside the empirical lies you believe a trip to the doctor to explain this condition?

 

[trevorjohnson83]

tell me again ReinyDays about the real size of stars too, that is relevant to this discussion,

 

[ReinyDays]

take it easy you must be leaking your eye candy impressiveness elsewhere too, is it just leaking out of you at all times? maybe since your mind doesn't allow stretching outside the empirical lies you believe a trip to the doctor to explain this condition?

That's not discussion ... I ask a simple question ... this is the best answer you have? ...

"Empirical lies" ... too funny ...

 

[ReinyDays]

tell me again ReinyDays about the real size of stars too, that is relevant to this discussion,

Our Sun is roughly 1,400,000 km wide, less than 1% of her distance to Earth ... do you have evidence this is wrong? ...

... or is this 6,000-year-old Flat Earth rhetoric? ... sheesh ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Our Sun is roughly 1,400,000 km wide, less than 1% of her distance to Earth ... do you have evidence this is wrong? ...

... or is this 6,000-year-old Flat Earth rhetoric? ... sheesh ...

hey well thought out! but I was referring to your side of you's that say the local stars are many times the size of our sun cause of parallax, but stick a fork in me I'm done with your c-rap.

 

[ReinyDays]

hey well thought out! but I was referring to your side of you's that say the local stars are many times the size of our sun cause of parallax, but stick a fork in me I'm done with your c-rap.

I asked about "sun cycles", not high school geometry ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

I asked about "sun cycles", not high school geometry ...

Yeah you can see why I was complaining about where this conversation is going? I answer your questions and then you ask the same f****** thing again, then I rebuttle with my own questions and you stereotypically of old old reinny.....put forth your smell of your eye candy.....pathetic

 

[frigidweirdo]

the break in the current ice age we are in where it keeps warming, speculated to be caused by the earth's orbit, its precession, and one other I forget. A while back I mentioned that it could be sun cycles, the northern lights reach far south in recent years, so the trend towards warming could be a sun cycle, sun is so poorly understood its hard to say the cause...

Er... what?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Climate Change is a political tool, not science

Which is total nonsense. There is plenty of science. The problem is there are those who misunderstand what's happening.

For example, there was a report that there's more snow and ice in Antarctica. So all the people who take no time to understand an issue said "this is because there's no global warming".

And yet, snow and ice come from precipitation. If Antarctica was -50 degrees and now it's -25 degrees, but it rains more, there will be more snow and ice. Doesn't mean that temperatures aren't getting cooler.