Summary And Conclusion: Never Trust Them

Nobody here is locked down anymore other than about 1/3 of the people that are no longer participating in the economy here but that can't hurt anybody.
 
Let's check:

3. Why lock down everyone when the statistics clearly indicate who is at risk?

Good point. We should have separated children from parents or guardians over 45 years old.

Gotten rid of teachers, doctors and nurses over 45 (for their own protection)
 
Age groupAll Deaths involving COVID-19 (U07.1)1Deaths from All Causes
25–34 years1,31840,030
35–44 years3,45056,730
45–54 years9,047104,779
55–64 years21,552240,290
 
8 in 10 People Who Have Died of COVID-19 Were Age 65 or Older – But the Share Varies By State
Now…..what’s the reason for lockdown, home confinement, and shutting the schools?

Because 2 of our 10 people who died of covid-19 were UNDER 65.


No they didn't.


8. Vast numbers of Democrat apparatchik were in on the scam. Hospital administrators and every one able authorize protocol told doctors to call every death a covid death, no matter what the actual cause of death is.



“The underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID- 19 being the underlying cause more often than not,” the guidelines read.

“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued.

“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry



As we have yet to reach the total death rate reported in 2019 for the same time period (January 1st and April 9th), it appears that there is something seriously wrong with the way this pandemic has been reported and handled by the medical community, the media, and the politicians.

Pathetically, it most likely isn’t going to get better when as of April 8, 2020, all patients with coronavirus are now being classified as “Death due to COVID-19,” regardless of the real cause of death. This draconian method of manipulating data to conform to your hypothesis is pure evil. It allows the medical community, the media, and politicians to cover up their errors, distort their miscalculations, and falsify their reports so that they can justify even further measures that will attempt to control, manipulate, and profit from those who don’t understand the importance of “statistical significance”. Statistically Significant: Why It Makes a Difference - Tom McFie


....and stampede sheep into blaming Trump.
 
Age groupAll Deaths involving COVID-19 (U07.1)1Deaths from All Causes
25–34 years1,31840,030
35–44 years3,45056,730
45–54 years9,047104,779
55–64 years21,552240,290



“This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid That's 9,210 deaths The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses & the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age” https://facebook.com/1566405890/posts/10224050038749877/?extid=gr0T716wo2v3tjFm&d=n…



NEXT!
 
8 in 10 People Who Have Died of COVID-19 Were Age 65 or Older

Now…..what’s the reason for lockdown, home confinement, and shutting the schools?

Because 2 of our 10 people who died of covid-19 were UNDER 65.

No they didn't.
Yes they did. 20% of people who died of covid-19 weren't old. And they all could spread it to vulnerable populations like happened in the red state nursing homes.
 
Let's check:

3. Why lock down everyone when the statistics clearly indicate who is at risk?

Good point. We should have separated children from parents or guardians over 45 years old.

Gotten rid of teachers, doctors and nurses over 45 (for their own protection)


You're the one who suggesting separating families.

It's more than interesting that your side wants to do away with families.


Eliminate the family

Leftist: Let's use coronavirus to eliminate 'the family'

'The time of corona is an excellent time to practice abolishing it'



For example, the total elimination of "the family."

"We deserve better than the family. And the time of corona is an excellent time to practice abolishing it," wrote radical-feminist activist Sophie Lewis on the website openDemocracy.

"Even when the private nuclear household poses no direct physical or mental threat to one's person – no spouse-battering, no child rape, and no queer-bashing – the private family qua mode of social reproduction still, frankly, sucks," wrote Lewis, the author of "Fu She said the nuclear family "genders, nationalizes and races us."

"It norms us for productive work. It makes us believe we are 'individuals,'" she said. "It minimizes costs for capital while maximizing human beings' life-making labor (across billions of tiny boxes, each kitted out – absurdly – with its own kitchen, micro-creche and laundry.) It blackmails us into mistaking the only sources of love and care we have for the extent of what is possible."

Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family.

"In short, the pandemic is no time to forget about family abolition. … Far from a time to acquiesce to 'family values' ideology, then, the pandemic is an acutely important time to provision, evacuate and generally empower survivors of – and refugees from – the nuclear household."

Sekulow pointed out openDemocracy gets funding from "notoriously liberal billionaire George Soros."

He also noted Lewis' demand for the abolition of private home ownership.

"This is a disgusting attack on traditional family values by the radical Left. It is unwarranted and unjustified assault at a time when so many are worried and uncertain about the future," he wrote.
 
8 in 10 People Who Have Died of COVID-19 Were Age 65 or Older

Now…..what’s the reason for lockdown, home confinement, and shutting the schools?

Because 2 of our 10 people who died of covid-19 were UNDER 65.

No they didn't.
Yes they did. 20% of people who died of covid-19 weren't old. And they all could spread it to vulnerable populations like happened in the red state nursing homes.

8 in 10 People Who Have Died of COVID-19 Were Age 65 or Older

Now…..what’s the reason for lockdown, home confinement, and shutting the schools?

Because 2 of our 10 people who died of covid-19 were UNDER 65.

No they didn't.
Yes they did. 20% of people who died of covid-19 weren't old. And they all could spread it to vulnerable populations like happened in the red state nursing homes.



That's a lie.

What were the real causes of death?

And....


"... only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid That's 9,210 deaths The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses & the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age” https://facebook.com/1566405890/posts/10224050038749877/?extid=gr0T716wo2v3tjFm&d=n…
 
“This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid That's 9,210 deaths The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses & the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age” https://facebook.com/1566405890/posts/10224050038749877/?extid=gr0T716wo2v3tjFm&d=n…



NEXT!
You realize your "proof" is a "PRIVATE" facebook page.


And a factcheck of the claim says it's false.



CDC Did Not 'Admit Only 6%' of Recorded Deaths from COVID ...
www.factcheck.org › 2020/09 › cdc-did-not-admit-onl...


Claim: "This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid."
Claimed by: Social media posts
Fact check by FactCheck.org: False
 
“This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid That's 9,210 deaths The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses & the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age” https://facebook.com/1566405890/posts/10224050038749877/?extid=gr0T716wo2v3tjFm&d=n…



NEXT!
You realize your "proof" is a "PRIVATE" facebook page.


And a factcheck of the claim says it's false.


CDC Did Not 'Admit Only 6%' of Recorded Deaths from COVID ...
www.factcheck.org › 2020/09 › cdc-did-not-admit-onl...


Claim: "This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid."
Claimed by: Social media posts
Fact check by FactCheck.org: False



Fact-Check, like you, is a lying Liberal source.


Fact-Check: a political fact-checking website created by the St. Petersburg Times, which endorsed Obama in '08.

'In 2003, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette described the St. Petersburg Times as a "usually liberal" newspaper.'Tampa Bay Times - Wikipedia





"PolitiFact’s liberal bias, yet again (Arizona law; Climategate)

By: barrypopik (Diary) | May 13th at 04:43 AM | 0



PolitiFact this week judged statements about the Arizona immigration law and Climategate. Guess what side these fact-checkers chose? If you guessed “Progressive/Democrat,” you’re a winner!




'PolitiFact is not that honest fact-checker. And these aren’t isolated cases. Once widely regarded as a unique, rigorous and reasonably independent investigator of political claims, PolitiFact now declares conservatives wrong three times more often than liberals. More pointedly, the journalism organization concludes that conservatives have flat out lied nine times more often than liberals.'

PolitiFact bias: Does the GOP tell nine times more lies than left? Really? - Conservative News



PolitiFact.com is a project operated by the Tampa Bay Times,...also known as the St. Petersburg Times,

"The Tampa Bay Times, previously named the St. Petersburg Times,..."

 


Fact-Check simply lies.....as you do.


Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
theswash.com ^ | 8/27/2012 11 | matchdoctor


Posted on 8/28/2012, 1:47:46 PM by bronxville

Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group

If you wanted to use a devious method to deceive people who are trying to differentiate between truth and lies on the Internet how would you do it? If you were extremely devious and had no conscience, you might set up a Web site with some official and unbiased sounding name that claims to be the encyclopedia of truth to be used as a tool for anyone who has the same biased view and wants to make believe to "back it up" with what they would like you to think is "indisputable fact."

That is exactly what Web sites like factcheck.org are. They are biased, politically motivated propaganda Web sites, manned and funded by biased political organizations who set up the sites for the sole purpose of deviously "backing up" the political arguments of those who hold the same views that they do. It's kind of like you have a friend who is in on your lie, and you use him to back up your story and don't tell anyone else he is your friend.

Just because they use a name that implies unbiased assessments, doesn't mean that they provide them. You can call your Web site anything you want. I can set up a web site called thetruth.org or realfacts.com or stopthelies.org and post any kind of biased political propaganda I want on it. The name means nothing. And in the case of sites like factcheck.org, the name is intentionally misleading and deceptive. But it isn't the only so called "fact check" site that is a fraud. There are others.

Think about it. Would you rely on any particular Web site to get the "truth?" Anyone honest would tell you that you should NOT rely solely on them to get your facts. You should get them by considering many different and sources, with different points of view and opinions and arrive at what you believe to be the truth by using your own God given senses. Only con artists purport to be the de facto source of truth.

If you look behind the scenes at these phony "fact check" sites, you find that they are funded by organizations with political biases. You must always ask yourself. Who is writing about this so-called "truth." Who funds the site and pays their expenses. What are the origins and history of the funders and who are they associated with. In the case of factcheck.org they receive their funding from the liberal Annenberg Foundation.

The Annenberg Foundation was originally founded by Walter J. Annenberg, a conservative who supported Ronald Reagan. However, when Walter Annenberg died, his family took over the management of the foundation and it took a turn to the far left and has ties to radical left individuals such as Bill Ayers and his friend and fellow left wing radical collegue Barack Obama. How is factcheck.org associated with these people:

To start, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.

Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.


Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
 
Still here. Just debating. What's your issue with that? It's because I'm calling out the gop, which is one sliver above the disgusting Dems. For some reason you don't like that?
 
Fact-Check, like you, is a lying Liberal source.


Fact-Check: a political fact-checking website created by the St. Petersburg Times, which endorsed Obama in '08.

Lots of sources confirmed it was a lie

No, the CDC Has Not "Quietly Updated" COVID-19 Death ...
www.the-scientist.com › news-opinion › no-the-cdc-has...


Sep 1, 2020 - An online conspiracy theory retweeted by President Donald Trump misconstrued data regarding the number of people who have died from the ...

Including Twitter.



Twitter removes QAnon conspiracy theory claiming CDC 'quietly'
www.kxan.com › news › coronavirus › twitter-removes...


Aug 31, 2020 - The claim originated from a tweet by a supporter of QAnon, a far-right conspiracy theory group, and was later retweeted by Pres. Donald Trump.
 
"CDC data shows majority of people who died from COVID-19 had pre-existing conditions
She also said it is concerning that CDC data shows that for 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was mentioned as the only cause. "
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top