Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, go cry to Gunny like the sissy that you are!!!I'd have to ask Gunny to repeal those from my rep log.
Yes, go cry to Gunny like the sissy that you are!!!
Actually it is you who are making an assumptions:
1. That the site is only presenting a heterosexual problem;
2. That the VA DOH has made the decision that you stated.
You can't make this stuff up.
You can't make this stuff up.
Yes, go cry to Gunny like the sissy that you are!!!
I support the equal application of the law despite the hatred of some over the legal behaviours of others. Indeed, it is as natural and reoccurring across social human cultures and animal behaviour so unless you have something to add besides NARTH links (essentially the niggermania dot com of homosexuality) then I suggest you take a big bite out of the irony of your position, black man.
No, you support homosexuality, which is the behaviour of two people of the same sex taking it up the anus and licking each other's clitoris for sexual stimulation, thats what *YOU* support though you yourself claimed to have never done it. The question is why are you defending homosexuality, ie, two men have anal sex with each other? Why do you support that sex act?
uh, nice description you decided to add there, buddy. Indeed, I'm not gay so no I never have. I take by your graphic description that the taste is still in your mouth though.
Again, what I support is the equal application of the Constitution. I really don't care if you want to make excuses for a double standard. Lord knows, your water hose, dog attack ancestors felt the brunt end of those kind of excuses to, black man. I defend the equal rights of gays just as I would the equal rights of ignorant black men who are too stupid to comprehend the irony of their bigotry.
In regards to the equal application of the Constitution there is a DIRECT comparison. Again, I don't care if you accept that or not. Yes, gays who legally behave differently than you ARE protected just like your black ass. Continue to fantasize about whatever you need to though. Seems like you've achieved a thread of your own that cebrates your raging homosexuality anyway.
Being black in being born of African and or predominately African ancestry genetically, being gay is having gay sex, there is no comparison, *END OF STORY*. The Bass reminds you that it is *YOU* who staunchly supports gay sex, not the Bass, so will the real sodomite please stand up? Why do you strongly support gay sex? Why do you strongly defend that sex act? What is so good about about it that you strongly support it? Since you claim to strongly defend things for a good cause please explain whats so "good" about two men shagging each other in the anus mate?
It doesn't matter if you want to disregard the genetic predisposition of homosexuality as if it validates a double standard for the application of the constitution. The FACT remains that their behaviour is legal and is just as natural as your black skin. Your opinions mean nothing.
Indeed, I support gays as any other citizen of the United States. Just as I support blacks. That giant chip on your shoulder and gay hating bigotry in your mind may wish this situation were different but thats the facts, jack. What is "good" about gays having sex is neither here nor there to me. Neither is chitlins and hog maws. Gay sex and soul food has no bearing on my rights as an American. It's no more your right to decide whose legal activity qualifies for Constitutional protection than it is my decision to put your black ass back in the cotton field. get used to knowing that. You are losing this fight.
Sorry, your "expertise" doesn't extend to genetics. cocksmoking? probably. Science? Make me laugh again. when did the APA become the fucking guiding organization for GENETICS? It's not a matter of whats so good about gay men having sex. I wouldn't know. What pisses me off is to see some hypocrite black dude act like the same kind of bigoted fuckstick that his own people has to deal with a mere 40 years ago. My opinion of your personal legal behaviour is neither here nor there in regards to your rights under the Constitution. Likewise, your opinion about gay dudes continues to mean two things: jack and shit.
The Constitution says nothing about gay sex and gay sex acts, you support gay sex and gay sex acts, not the Constitution. Rejecting gay sex as sinful, contra to the bible and being outright disgusting isn't bigotry you moron.
Again, you posted your link in response to my question, and it doesn't give an answer.Again, read the text of the page. If you can find any reference at all to gay men fucking boys then go ahead and post it. Otherwise, as always, you are doing nothing more than squirming around the facts presented to you.
Charlie, it's not about supporting the sex act, it's about being human and not seeking to demonize individual human beings. What does your bible say about that?
The US constitution provides for individual freedom, so you're free to hate the gay sex act as much individual people are free to love whomever they choose. It's none of your business what consenting adults do in their privacy, and it is especially none of the government's business either.