Godboy
Diamond Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 37,851
- 20,759
- 1,905
Its a website for people who jack off to doomsday scenarios.End Time Headlines? I kinda chuckled at that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its a website for people who jack off to doomsday scenarios.End Time Headlines? I kinda chuckled at that.
Please tell me how we can see a planet circling a far away sun that looks like a dot and say there is life, clouds, water, atmosphere and the rest and we have spent tens of billions of dollars on robot spacecraft landing and circling with advanced cameras, advanced detectors of anything possible and telescopes on earth also looking at mars and have not found a molecule of life? We change the tests for it on every mission and the results are still the same.
For starters, because there is no life on Mars. We can do the other things you mentioned because we can analyze the light spectral patters those exoplanets emit much like a finger print. Certain gases in those atmospheres produce certain changes in the light we detect emanating from them. That’s how we make those determinations.
Please tell me how we can see a planet circling a far away sun that looks like a dot and say there is life, clouds, water, atmosphere and the rest and we have spent tens of billions of dollars on robot spacecraft landing and circling with advanced cameras, advanced detectors of anything possible and telescopes on earth also looking at mars and have not found a molecule of life? We change the tests for it on every mission and the results are still the same.
For starters, because there is no life on Mars. We can do the other things you mentioned because we can analyze the light spectral patters those exoplanets emit much like a finger print. Certain gases in those atmospheres produce certain changes in the light we detect emanating from them. That’s how we make those determinations.
In other words, it is based on a theory that has not been proven. Light traveling for millions of years could be affected by any number of sources across that distance. Call me skeptical.
It was probably a thriving planet that was ultimately destroyed by Muslims.
Please tell me how we can see a planet circling a far away sun that looks like a dot and say there is life, clouds, water, atmosphere and the rest and we have spent tens of billions of dollars on robot spacecraft landing and circling with advanced cameras, advanced detectors of anything possible and telescopes on earth also looking at mars and have not found a molecule of life? We change the tests for it on every mission and the results are still the same.
For starters, because there is no life on Mars. We can do the other things you mentioned because we can analyze the light spectral patters those exoplanets emit much like a finger print. Certain gases in those atmospheres produce certain changes in the light we detect emanating from them. That’s how we make those determinations.
In other words, it is based on a theory that has not been proven. Light traveling for millions of years could be affected by any number of sources across that distance. Call me skeptical.
How about we just call you an idiot. Your whole life is based on a theory that hasn't been proven.
Please tell me how we can see a planet circling a far away sun that looks like a dot and say there is life, clouds, water, atmosphere and the rest and we have spent tens of billions of dollars on robot spacecraft landing and circling with advanced cameras, advanced detectors of anything possible and telescopes on earth also looking at mars and have not found a molecule of life? We change the tests for it on every mission and the results are still the same.
For starters, because there is no life on Mars. We can do the other things you mentioned because we can analyze the light spectral patters those exoplanets emit much like a finger print. Certain gases in those atmospheres produce certain changes in the light we detect emanating from them. That’s how we make those determinations.
In other words, it is based on a theory that has not been proven. Light traveling for millions of years could be affected by any number of sources across that distance. Call me skeptical.
How about we just call you an idiot. Your whole life is based on a theory that hasn't been proven.
Yeah, it's like that "hole flow" theory that tube freaks like you use to explain how electricity flows the wrong way.
Please tell me how we can see a planet circling a far away sun that looks like a dot and say there is life, clouds, water, atmosphere and the rest and we have spent tens of billions of dollars on robot spacecraft landing and circling with advanced cameras, advanced detectors of anything possible and telescopes on earth also looking at mars and have not found a molecule of life? We change the tests for it on every mission and the results are still the same.
For starters, because there is no life on Mars. We can do the other things you mentioned because we can analyze the light spectral patters those exoplanets emit much like a finger print. Certain gases in those atmospheres produce certain changes in the light we detect emanating from them. That’s how we make those determinations.
In other words, it is based on a theory that has not been proven. Light traveling for millions of years could be affected by any number of sources across that distance. Call me skeptical.
Please tell me how we can see a planet circling a far away sun that looks like a dot and say there is life, clouds, water, atmosphere and the rest and we have spent tens of billions of dollars on robot spacecraft landing and circling with advanced cameras, advanced detectors of anything possible and telescopes on earth also looking at mars and have not found a molecule of life? We change the tests for it on every mission and the results are still the same.
For starters, because there is no life on Mars. We can do the other things you mentioned because we can analyze the light spectral patters those exoplanets emit much like a finger print. Certain gases in those atmospheres produce certain changes in the light we detect emanating from them. That’s how we make those determinations.
In other words, it is based on a theory that has not been proven. Light traveling for millions of years could be affected by any number of sources across that distance. Call me skeptical.
Well actually it has been proven & is a very common technique. The data isn’t just taken from the visible part of the light spectrum either...
How to Measure Exoplanet Light – Exoplanet Exploration: Planets Beyond our Solar System
Please tell me how we can see a planet circling a far away sun that looks like a dot and say there is life, clouds, water, atmosphere and the rest and we have spent tens of billions of dollars on robot spacecraft landing and circling with advanced cameras, advanced detectors of anything possible and telescopes on earth also looking at mars and have not found a molecule of life? We change the tests for it on every mission and the results are still the same.
For starters, because there is no life on Mars. We can do the other things you mentioned because we can analyze the light spectral patters those exoplanets emit much like a finger print. Certain gases in those atmospheres produce certain changes in the light we detect emanating from them. That’s how we make those determinations.
In other words, it is based on a theory that has not been proven. Light traveling for millions of years could be affected by any number of sources across that distance. Call me skeptical.
How about we just call you an idiot. Your whole life is based on a theory that hasn't been proven.
Yeah, it's like that "hole flow" theory that tube freaks like you use to explain how electricity flows the wrong way.
More uneducated dreck from the 27 year teacher that doesn't teach? What you are trying to refer to is called "conventional flow" of positive to negative caused by the electron holes made in a substrate (displaced valance electrons) due to the displacement of electrons flowing negative to cancel the charge forming an ion. As opposed to electron flow, which is the actual electrons flowing toward the positive source.
Any more crap you got wrong and taught wrong for years to your PS victims you want me to straighten you out on?
For starters, because there is no life on Mars. We can do the other things you mentioned because we can analyze the light spectral patters those exoplanets emit much like a finger print. Certain gases in those atmospheres produce certain changes in the light we detect emanating from them. That’s how we make those determinations.
In other words, it is based on a theory that has not been proven. Light traveling for millions of years could be affected by any number of sources across that distance. Call me skeptical.
How about we just call you an idiot. Your whole life is based on a theory that hasn't been proven.
Yeah, it's like that "hole flow" theory that tube freaks like you use to explain how electricity flows the wrong way.
More uneducated dreck from the 27 year teacher that doesn't teach? What you are trying to refer to is called "conventional flow" of positive to negative caused by the electron holes made in a substrate (displaced valance electrons) due to the displacement of electrons flowing negative to cancel the charge forming an ion. As opposed to electron flow, which is the actual electrons flowing toward the positive source.
Any more crap you got wrong and taught wrong for years to your PS victims you want me to straighten you out on?
I was a Navy electronics technician. People who work on actual equipment for a livng know thet the theory does not work, especially in vacuum tubes. Our intsructors used to laugh at students who had college classes in elctrical theory when they could not explain their "hole theory".
In other words, it is based on a theory that has not been proven. Light traveling for millions of years could be affected by any number of sources across that distance. Call me skeptical.
How about we just call you an idiot. Your whole life is based on a theory that hasn't been proven.
Yeah, it's like that "hole flow" theory that tube freaks like you use to explain how electricity flows the wrong way.
More uneducated dreck from the 27 year teacher that doesn't teach? What you are trying to refer to is called "conventional flow" of positive to negative caused by the electron holes made in a substrate (displaced valance electrons) due to the displacement of electrons flowing negative to cancel the charge forming an ion. As opposed to electron flow, which is the actual electrons flowing toward the positive source.
Any more crap you got wrong and taught wrong for years to your PS victims you want me to straighten you out on?
I was a Navy electronics technician. People who work on actual equipment for a living know that the theory does not work, especially in vacuum tubes. Our instructors used to laugh at students who had college classes in electrical theory when they could not explain their "hole theory".
So basically, you were a buttcrack grunt repairman. I wouldn't expect you to understand the physics of it. The stuff you worked on, I used to design. Hope you were a better technician than you were math teacher or combat instructor. How many other hats did you wear?
Look, Chumly, you are just another one of these USMB trolls who claims expertise on all things: the combat instructor who couldn't fight his way out of a female dorm panty raid, the 27 year math instructor who couldn't explain a simple math concept to others here, and now telling others who used to design and analyze telecom and audio gear down to below the component level what I don't know about the flow of electricity!YOU don't understand the physics of it any more than any of my college professors in electrical engineering, who addressed my arguments of why electricity cannot flow from positive to negative with shrugged shoulders, and said, "That's just the way it is!"
Look, Chumly, you are just another one of these USMB trolls who claims expertise on all things: the combat instructor who couldn't fight his way out of a female dorm panty raid, the 27 year math instructor who couldn't explain a simple math concept to others here, and now telling others who used to design and analyze telecom and audio gear down to below the component level what I don't know about the flow of electricity!YOU don't understand the physics of it any more than any of my college professors in electrical engineering, who addressed my arguments of why electricity cannot flow from positive to negative with shrugged shoulders, and said, "That's just the way it is!"
SPARE US your bullshit, "Admiral," we've all heard it here from you 100 other times, if you went to college and your instructors told you that, you deserved being ripped off whatever tuition they charged you! Obviously, if your instructors were idiots, where does that leave you? IDIOT+
If we make nuclear powered space ships that accelerate themselves by superheating heavy metals like lead, mercury or tungsten, we could travel to Pluto in 15 days, or interstellar in a relatively short time. To go an interstellar distance, at such acceleration, take the distance in light yuears and add one year, so it would take 111 years to reach this planet, but it would seem like only a few years.Planet only comes with ONE small glitch-- -- -- -- with present NASA/JPL technology, it would still take an astronaut 4.6 million years just to get there one way. Even Tang and MREs don't keep that long!
Mars is merely a convenient logistical supply point for mining the Astroid Belt.Because it looks like Arizona. Never mind the temp is lower than the north pole most of the time.Then why do we keep going there? It seems to be an addiction that every two years another mission is sent.
IF we do that, we would build a base on the asteroid/moon Phobos or Deimos. Still not much reason to settle down on mars. But the truth is, were never gonna go there.Mars is merely a convenient logistical supply point for mining the Astroid Belt.Because it looks like Arizona. Never mind the temp is lower than the north pole most of the time.Then why do we keep going there? It seems to be an addiction that every two years another mission is sent.
Why do we want to do that?
Well....
NASA: Asteroid has $10,000 Quadrillion in Iron, Gold, Silver
IF we do that, we would build a base on the asteroid/moon Phobos or Deimos.
Still not much reason to settle down on mars. But the truth is, were never gonna go there.