BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Maybe he gets paid by the (unread) word.You’re way too wordy. You expect people to slog through all that? Just summarize.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe he gets paid by the (unread) word.You’re way too wordy. You expect people to slog through all that? Just summarize.
Why do Thomas Sowell and Shelby Steele evoke such anger and hatred in you? Are they perhaps a threat to your fundamental beliefs in White Racism and Black victim hood?Thomas Sowell is not some great independent thinker delivering blacks some kind of truth we do not want to accept. He's a black man who panders to white racists to earn a living.
A Critique of Thomas Sowell
View attachment 775709
Given the gargantuan volume of Sowell’s popular writing, I’m going to need to focus on the central cluster of claims Sowell is known for. This is essentially aggregated from a variety of Sowell’s work since much of it is repetitive — the primary books I’m addressing are Discrimination and Disparities and Black Rednecks, White Liberals, combined with the vast expanse of Sowell video interviews and clips available on the Internet. I’ve broken down what I see to be this central cluster into its constitutive claims in order to deal with them in sequence:
Each of these claims, as well as the argument as a whole, are riddled with problems of argumentative logic and empirical evidence. In many cases even just one of them would tank the entire enterprise; the sum of all of them is utterly damning. Even in my semi premature academic studies, I am able to conceptualize what affects the black community better than this so-called ‘economist’.
- Disparities do not prove discrimination, particularly pertaining to Black-White economic inequality in the US.
- Black Americans, especially the worst-off living in urban centres, have a “redneck” culture that was handed to them by White southerners via Britain. It is this culture that produces bad behavioural patterns, such as crime and single parenthood.
- These behavioural patterns are exacerbated by the interventions of the welfare state.
- It is these behavioural patterns from the combination of culture and welfare that lead to Black-White economic inequality.
- Black people are blameworthy for their inequality-producing behaviour.
Discrimination and Disparities
Sowell is correct that intentional racial discrimination (according to Sowell’s classification, Discrimination 1 and 2) at a given juncture — say, racial discrimination by an employer — cannot fully explain Black-White racial disparities in economic outcomes. It does not follow, however, that therefore the remaining racial disparity not explained by acute racial discrimination is not caused by racism in society. Sowell concludes that, for instance, employers and realtors and bankers will make choices about hiring or real estate or loans based on the relevant qualities the individual brings to the table, such as education, credit scores, criminal or eviction history, and so on (this is what he calls Discrimination). People have differences in the quantity and quality of these they can bring to the table, and thus it is perfectly reasonable to find inequalities in economic outcomes.
What is not answered by this, however, is why these inequalities would be unevenly distributed by race.
Why Do People Love Thomas Sowell?
Thomas Sowell, I think it is fair to say, is first and foremost a pundit. He has made his career less on scholarly arguments accountable to the rigorous critique of his peers and more on quotable quips, book-length tirades, and debate clap lines for the adulation of his libertarian fans and conservative think tank colleagues — especially claiming to be an ex-Marxist who ‘saw the light”. Even though his arguments are hollow when you knock on them, Sowell presents his arguments with confidence and frames the story as being one of an incompetent, mean-spirited economic left against a ‘sensible’, objective, evidence-based economic right. When that is a story you already believe, Sowell’s arguments appear compelling, and his demeanour is confident and charismatic. But ultimately, Sowell is better at rhetorical flourish than thoughtful empirical analysis or philosophical consistency.
You can always summarize his posts with "Whitey Bad, Black people are victims, Black conservatives are liars".You’re way too wordy. You expect people to slog through all that? Just summarize.
Still playing the black sock I see.Let's consider Sowell's opinion here.
One can always summarize racist posts with "Be a good house n----- like Sowell, IM2. Now take the garbage down to the road, then keep smiling like a deranged monkey there as you hold the hurricane lamp high until bedtime."You can always summarize
One of my favorite Thomas Sowell quotes:I will continue showing the flaws in Sowells opinion. Racist whites love him because he enables their mental sickness. But the truth is that Sowell is full of......
To “continue,” you’d have to someday start.I will continue showing the flaws in Sowells opinion. Racist whites love him because he enables their mental sickness. But the truth is that Sowell is full of......
Nothing triggers our friend like Thomas Sowell or Shelby Steele. They are the antithesis of everything he clings to.I read the thread title and I KNEW IM2 was the author![]()
He and others like him HATE any black (or white) who refuses to blame whitey for blacks’ poorer outcomes - and suggests that they are responsible for their own choices in life.Nothing triggers our friend like Thomas Sowell or Shelby Steele. They are the antithesis of everything he clings to.
Blacks are not discriminated against any more. They are discriminated against because of affirmative action programs. Trillions of white tax dollars have been spent on anti poverty programs designed to help blacks.Thomas Sowell is not some great independent thinker delivering blacks some kind of truth we do not want to accept. He's a black man who panders to white racists to earn a living.
A Critique of Thomas Sowell
View attachment 775709
Given the gargantuan volume of Sowell’s popular writing, I’m going to need to focus on the central cluster of claims Sowell is known for. This is essentially aggregated from a variety of Sowell’s work since much of it is repetitive — the primary books I’m addressing are Discrimination and Disparities and Black Rednecks, White Liberals, combined with the vast expanse of Sowell video interviews and clips available on the Internet. I’ve broken down what I see to be this central cluster into its constitutive claims in order to deal with them in sequence:
- Disparities do not prove discrimination, particularly pertaining to Black-White economic inequality in the US.
I agree that Thomas Sowell is mistaken here.
- Black Americans, especially the worst-off living in urban centres, have a “redneck” culture that was handed to them by White southerners via Britain. It is this culture that produces bad behavioural patterns, such as crime and single parenthood.
By supporting illegitimate children and people who choose not to work, the welfare system nurtures dysfunctional behavior. When Aid for Families with Dependent Children was introduced during the 1930's it was specifically restricted to widows, deserted wives, and their legitimate children. Unmarried women and their illegitimate children were left to their own devices.
- These behavioural patterns are exacerbated by the interventions of the welfare state.
Black dysfunction certainly contributes to racial inequality. Poor whites and poor blacks usually respond differently to efforts to help them. New Deal programs turned millions of unemployed whites into a stable working class of tax payers who obeyed the law.
- It is these behavioural patterns from the combination of culture and welfare that lead to Black-White economic inequality.
Only to an extent. People cannot be blamed for being born with low IQ's.
- Black people are blameworthy for their inequality-producing behavior.
"How Much Can We Boost IQ and Achievement?" is a 1969 article by Arthur Jensen published in the Harvard Educational Review.[1] It is among the most controversial[2][3] in American psychology, and was largely responsible for initiating the current debate over race and intelligence.[4][5]
The OP's dislike and dismissal of Thomas Sowell only increases Sowell's creditability in my book.OP, thanks but no thanks regarding your advice as to whom I should listen. I will decide that for myself. I find Thomas Sowell's statements to be rich in both intelligence and common sense.