Stewart bites the dust

Fascism : a way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a dictator (Trump) controls the lives of the people and in which people are not allowed to disagree with the government.
Hey idiot, quit changing what Sparky said adding Trump's name in there! Biden has acted far more like a dictator than Trump ever did!

The way to prevent Fascism is to have separation of powers.
Must be why all democrats have done is to try to eliminate those powers. First impeachment of Trump was based literally on impeaching Trump because he FOLLOWED the separation of powers by listening to the OLC and taking their legal advice of not submitting to Nasty Nancy's requests for legal documents unless she properly submitted them in WRITING exactly because the EO DOES NOT submit to another equal branch of government to operate on their whims! To issue a subpoena, a subcommittee must conform to the resolution establishing its powers. House never voted to give said powers to any subcommittee. House never had any resolution in the first place. Nancy simply gave herself power to do so at a press conference effectively demanding that the Executive office operate AT HER PLEASURE.

In effect: Democrats demanded Trump give up privileges and immunities constitutionally afforded him or Nadler would take away all of his rights period. You cannot conditionally exercise some rights upon the surrender of others effectively removing the separation of powers making the Exec serve under the pleasure of Congress, ergo, legislative dictatorship.

Trump did the proper thing and democrats still impeached him for it. Second impeachment was for basically holding a rally protesting certifying an election where literally thousands of questions still remained as to it legality--- Democratic dictatorship.
 
Hey idiot, quit changing what Sparky said adding Trump's name in there! Biden has acted far more like a dictator than Trump ever did!


Must be why all democrats have done is to try to eliminate those powers. First impeachment of Trump was based literally on impeaching Trump because he FOLLOWED the separation of powers by listening to the OLC and taking their legal advice of not submitting to Nasty Nancy's requests for legal documents unless she properly submitted them in WRITING exactly because the EO DOES NOT submit to another equal branch of government to operate on their whims! To issue a subpoena, a subcommittee must conform to the resolution establishing its powers. House never voted to give said powers to any subcommittee. House never had any resolution in the first place. Nancy simply gave herself power to do so at a press conference effectively demanding that the Executive office operate AT HER PLEASURE.

In effect: Democrats demanded Trump give up privileges and immunities constitutionally afforded him or Nadler would take away all of his rights period. You cannot conditionally exercise some rights upon the surrender of others effectively removing the separation of powers making the Exec serve under the pleasure of Congress, ergo, legislative dictatorship.

Trump did the proper thing and democrats still impeached him for it. Second impeachment was for basically holding a rally protesting certifying an election where literally thousands of questions still remained as to it legality--- Democratic dictatorship.
Trump committed the great crime of beating Hillary and he had to be punished. Impeachment was on their agenda even before he was sworn in.
 
She nailed Trump down years before these slugs began to grasp the meaning of her words.
They’re just coming around to their own incompetence.
Isn't she the lying bitch that blamed her husband's philandering on a "vast right wing conspiracy"? Then when the lying bastard admitted to it, she never apologized for lying to the American people.
 
I agree Elmer

and we can insist on their duties being just that, as well as argue the FF' wanted it that way

but how do we separate them from their agendas ?

~~S~
Whose agenda?
Sedition is notoriously hard to prove historically.
Why do you imagine that it seems to have gone so smoothly this time around?
An iron clad conspiracy or a relatively easy burden to prove?
 
Not too difficult to shut these propaganda parrots up. Just tell the truth.
 
Whose agenda?
Sedition is notoriously hard to prove historically.
Why do you imagine that it seems to have gone so smoothly this time around?
An iron clad conspiracy or a relatively easy burden to prove?
You twits are very confused. Attacking corrupt politicians isn't sedition.
 
Isn't she the lying bitch that blamed her husband's philandering on a "vast right wing conspiracy"? Then when the lying bastard admitted to it, she never apologized for lying to the American people.
You believe that to be an apt comparison?
 

Forum List

Back
Top