Trajan, a lot to go through, I just want to hit some of the high points. but thanks for a thoughtful response overall.
[
then you are using the word/term 'standard' wrong. The standard isn't 'I want it gone so it goes away', its never been that simple and there are rules.
The standard is what the gov. allows and I don't have an issue with 26 weeks btw.
Do you recognize any limits? 26, 30, or right up until the due date?
I think the limit should be what the woman and her doctor think is appropriate.
so, to be clear- the answer appears to be; no time limit and if its the day before the bay was due under normal circumstances thats fine...(?)
I also don't believe that anyone has an abortion after 24 weeks unless something has gone horribly wrong with the pregnancy. In any event, I see no reason for politiicians to be sticking their nose in.
if that were the case, I suspect we would not be having this discussion.
The politicians are politicians becasue they are elected to do what they do, who else is there? (and don't say the mother

)
[
see bold emphasis- then I feel sorry for them and I am betting that for maybe a third that may be true, but as for the rest I would hope and believe they see it as more than just a "problem", not some dispassionate issue that requires little more thought than what kind of smart phone to buy ....this is a viable life (until or if proven otherwise)
I was referring to those who seek abortion, of course. Sorry I didn't make myself clear on that point. But here's the thing, for a woman who isn't ready yet, this is a problem.
I spoke of the gal I knew who tried to force the issue with her boyfriend by 'forgetting' her birth control. Now, having to have the baby would mean dropping out of school, limiting her job prospects, causing all sorts of problems with her parents and long drawn out legal proceedings with her ex-boyfriend. In short, she would have been in a world of suck because she made one bad decision.
Here's the thing. I'm not pro-abortion (although I do confess to a bit of malicious mischeif tweeking peole like Jinn and Kosher.) I just think the anti-choice folks who think putting more obstacles in the way of women getting them are on teh wrong track.
fair enough, but we have yet to agree, that is in our exchange on what a reasonable yardstick is, I will sit with 26 weeks ( minus threats to the mothers life etc.) .
[
I'll throw out a general observation- theres are entities that love using crass emotional appeals to drive agenda.
I have heard that case made vis a vis states wanting to enact laws demanding sonograms prior to an abortion, yes, I can see that as an emotional appeal as well as containing an educational aspect too.
.
I think the problem with the mandetory sonogram is that at the stage most women have an abortion, you really can't see anything. At 8 weeks, (where most abortions are performed) the fetus is the size of a kidney bean.
But I will go even one further. The Right can't stop talking about late abortions, and the left can't stop talking about rape abortions, but between them, they probably represent less than 1% of all abortions performed. Both sides appeal to emotion.
I was referring to an ultra sound at the later stages 26 weeks and there after...
and I agree that the right moves the conversation, uses late term as a hammer as its particular egregious where in what I think, they really want to to stop all abortions, which, well, that ship has sailed.