Probably much more costly that selling it, renting it out or repurposing it, but yes, though crude, demolishing it is certainly an option given you get permission etc.
That's what I do, that's what I've done for fifty years and that's why I understand why work from home is a net benefit and you don't and that's because you don't have a thinking job and that's because you can't think.
www.forbes.com
Well...that's not the employees fault, so it ought not be their problem.
Well RTO sort of sucks.Or they could return to the office.
DOGE will figure it out.
Too bad. The rest of the country has done it. Time for feds to start working full-time jobs.
The building I was referring to is 12 years old and I don't think tearing it down so lazy people can work in their pajamas is a very sound idea....
Sucks for the rest of the country. This is literally just crab mentality. "I have it bad, so I'm gonna make sure others do too." Why don't you just find a public sector job? You know, it's funny. My whole life I always heard people talking about how much worse public sector jobs were than private sector, and yet, having worked both now, it's no contest. Private sector doesn't even come close.
But if they were lazy they wouldn't be working.
I'm not an idiot... I know companies are bringing their workers back... I don't care what kind of anecdotal crap you find on the internet... they don't want people working from home anymore...
A lot of people need to go but allowing the rest to work from home is just not workable...
Pandemic is long over
1) I’m retired.
Well if they can force people to take experimental drugs, then the least they can do is improve their working conditions. Unless people are straight up not doing their jobs, I don't care if they work from the office, from home, from under a highway bridge, or from a tunnel network in a jungle.
While your concern is understandable, and I even agree to some extent, it has little to do with work from home. I'm not a part time worker just because I'm doing my job from home as opposed to doing it in an office.
Well, then get a job in the private sector, where you'll at least be adding some marginal value to the productive economy.That's what I do, that's what I've done for fifty years and that's why I understand why work from home is a net benefit and you don't and that's because you don't have a thinking job and that's because you can't think.
Some are I'm sure but how many? 10% 70% how many?
Does that apply to the President or can he work from home regardless of the expense of maintaining multiple offices for his use and having him and his staff commute by Air Force One?Only 6% of federal employees work from an office full-time, and a third are fully remote. And some aren’t actually working when they “work from home,” a Senate investigation found.
“Washington is still operating as if it’s March 2020,” Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA), the chair of the Senate DOGE Caucus and the report’s author, wrote.
“Just three percent of the federal workforce teleworked daily prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Today, six percent of workers report in-person on a full-time basis, while nearly one-third are entirely remote,” the report states.
Government office buildings have an occupancy rate of only 12%, yet the government spends $16 billion a year to operate them. Even the head of the General Services Administration, which manages federal real estate, works from home in Missouri.
“You may be more likely to see a ghost than a bureaucrat haunting the halls of some government buildings in Washington, D.C. these days,” Ernst continued.
Only 6% Of Feds Work From An Office Full-Time — And Some Aren’t Working At All, Audit Finds
Office buildings are so empty that at the office of the EPA, which is tasked with ensuring clean drinking water, there was dangerous bacteria in its own water because it was stagnant from being used so infrequently.www.dailywire.com
And here we go. Our federal government is a bloated cesspool of waste. Elon and Vivek ought to have a field day right out of the gate
