Staffer Accuses Joe Biden of Penetrative Forcible Sexual Assault

[Canon Shooter]

"...and many of them are on the younger side.

I'm 57 years old. A woman "on the younger side", to me, is someone in her late 20's into her 30's.

Only a fuckin' pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

doesn't matter, it's cuomo's budget and his responsibility for his state facilities.

You asked the question and got the correct answer. I wasn't making excuses. And explanation is not an excuse.

 

[Correll]

Has Biden been sued for child rape like Trump? Biden has never been accused of raping a 14 year old like Trump. Trump is also being sued now for defamation regarding a rape. What is the status of that case?

Because he didn't hang around Epstein.

Epstein was 86'ed from Trump's properties many years ago. Mr. Trump found out what he was up to, and said he wasn't going to hang out with him.

I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.

That quote is all over the internet.

One link:
Jeffrey Epstein: Trump once praised financier charged with sex trafficking minors for liking women 'on the younger side'

There is nothing wrong with liking "beautiful, younger women".

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What? Prove that claim

No goober, I was being facetious in response to the other poster's stupid comment.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Only a fuckin' pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old...

In other words, Donald Trump.

 

[Correll]

"...and many of them are on the younger side.

I'm 57 years old. A woman "on the younger side", to me, is someone in her late 20's into her 30's.

Only a fuckin' pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old...

I'm a little younger than you. To me, "younger" would mean, "20s", and early 20s would be somewhat scandalous.


Agreed. Only a fucking pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old.


14 is not "younger woman", it is "older child".

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Should we side with liberals who say the woman should always be believed, even without evidence, or should we side with conservatives who say the woman should never be believed unless there's evidence?

You do whatever pleases your little heart. But whatever you do, don't take any personal responsibility for your stance and make sure to attribute your stance to being a fool to make an idiotic to quoque point.

 

[xyz]

"...and many of them are on the younger side.

I'm 57 years old. A woman "on the younger side", to me, is someone in her late 20's into her 30's.

Only a fuckin' pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old...

A pervert? You mean like this guy who comments on baby Tiffany's legs and breasts?

 

[Faun]

Unlike Wee Willy Clinton who reportedly visited Epstien's island of child rape multiple times...Documented.

Liar.

 

[Canon Shooter]

"...and many of them are on the younger side.

I'm 57 years old. A woman "on the younger side", to me, is someone in her late 20's into her 30's.

Only a fuckin' pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old...

A pervert? You mean like this guy who comments on baby Tiffany's legs and breasts?

No. I explained that anyone who instantly thinks of a 14 year old girl when the words "on the younger side" are uttered is a fucking pervert.

That was pretty simple, yet it really seemed to throw you a curve...

 

[Canon Shooter]

Should we side with liberals who say the woman should always be believed, even without evidence, or should we side with conservatives who say the woman should never be believed unless there's evidence?

You do whatever pleases your little heart. But whatever you do, don't take any personal responsibility for your stance and make sure to attribute your stance to being a fool to make an idiotic to quoque point.

My position is that, without evidence, the accusations are, at best, very suspect, especially if the supposed assault took place years ago. I thought that with Justice Kavanaugh, and I feel that way about Biden. The allegations should've been made when the alleged conduct took place. This is not something I will hold against Biden.

I'm just calling out the hypocrites who believe that it's perfectly fine to lambaste Trump for something they're perfectly willing to give Biden a pass on.

I have a weak stomach for hypocrisy...

 

[Correll]

Only a fuckin' pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old...

In other words, Donald Trump.

You can read minds across space and time? Cool. What number am I thinking of?

 

[Canon Shooter]

Only a fuckin' pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old...

In other words, Donald Trump.

No, in other words, the pervert who made the post I replied to.

Seriously, who the fuck thinks about a 14 year old girl when "on the younger side" is used to describe someone for which there's a sexual attraction?

 

[Correll]

Should we side with liberals who say the woman should always be believed, even without evidence, or should we side with conservatives who say the woman should never be believed unless there's evidence?

You do whatever pleases your little heart. But whatever you do, don't take any personal responsibility for your stance and make sure to attribute your stance to being a fool to make an idiotic to quoque point.

My position is that, without evidence, the accusations are, at best, very suspect, especially if the supposed assault took place years ago. I thought that with Justice Kavanaugh, and I feel that way about Biden. The allegations should've been made when the alleged conduct took place. This is not something I will hold against Biden.

I'm just calling out the hypocrites who believe that it's perfectly fine to lambaste Trump for something they're perfectly willing to give Biden a pass on.

I have a weak stomach for hypocrisy...

I agree completely. This should not be an issue for Biden. Other than his own hypocrisy in slamming others, while defending himself, of course.

 

[Faun]

Only a fuckin' pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old...

In other words, Donald Trump.

You can read minds across space and time? Cool. What number am I thinking of?

Not really a stretch given Impeached Trump once looked at a ten year old and joked he'd be dating her when she's 20.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

My position is that, without evidence, the accusations are, at best, very suspect, especially if the supposed assault took place years ago. I thought that with Justice Kavanaugh, and I feel that way about Biden. The allegations should've been made when the alleged conduct took place. This is not something I will hold against Biden.

Gotcha. So I guess your question to me was frivolous. Good that you have your own thoughts

I have yet to see too many give Biden a pass. You just did. But something does need clarified:

Some of the allegations against Trump are not very old. Some were from 2016 and made public in 2016. What "evidence" would compel you that the accusations -- from multiple people who knew Trump in multiple different ways and did not know each other -- have merit?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Seriously, who the fuck thinks about a 14 year old girl when "on the younger side" is used to describe someone for which there's a sexual attraction?

Probably Donald Trump, as he is clearly a pervert. And one would have to be truly brainwashed not to believe he was referring to epstein's pederasty. Unless your dictionary is different than mine, I would say raw dogging a porn star with a newborn baby at home with the wifebot instantly qualifies him. I would say walking in unannounced on teenage girls in a changing room does the same.

 

[Correll]

Only a fuckin' pervert would immediately think it means a 14 year old...

In other words, Donald Trump.

You can read minds across space and time? Cool. What number am I thinking of?

Not really a stretch given Impeached Trump once looked at a ten year old and joked he'd be dating her when she's 20.

Indiana said nothing of guessing. He is going to read my mind and know the number I was thinking of, and then we will have to defer to his power and insight.


Your conflating a joke, with actual perversion, is noted and dismissed.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Seriously, who the fuck thinks about a 14 year old girl when "on the younger side" is used to describe someone for which there's a sexual attraction?

Probably Donald Trump, as he is clearly a pervert. And one would have to be truly brainwashed not to believe he was referring to epstein's pederasty. Unless your dictionary is different than mine, I would say raw dogging a porn star with a newborn baby at home with the wifebot instantly qualifies him. I would say walking in unannounced on teenage girls in a changing room does the same.

Maybe your upbringing was more suspect than mine.

My parents raised me well and they raised me right. I don't know what "raw dogging" is...

 

[Canon Shooter]

My position is that, without evidence, the accusations are, at best, very suspect, especially if the supposed assault took place years ago. I thought that with Justice Kavanaugh, and I feel that way about Biden. The allegations should've been made when the alleged conduct took place. This is not something I will hold against Biden.

Gotcha. So I guess your question to me was frivolous. Good that you have your own thoughts

I have yet to see too many give Biden a pass. You just did.

Yes, because the allegations are old and completely unsupported, just like the ones against Trump...

But something does need clarified:

Some of the allegations against Trump are not very old. Some were from 2016 and made public in 2016. What "evidence" would compel you that the accusations -- from multiple people who knew Trump in multiple different ways and did not know each other -- have merit?

The allegations from 2016. Were they made in 2016 or did the incident take place in 2016? When in 2016 were the allegations made? Were they made immediately or after Trump announced?