Statistikhengst
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
Not sure if this has been broached at all, and of course, it also depends on the speed of the system and how many apps are running as embedded withing a browser, but I have four browsers on my system (WIN 7 Home Premium):
Google Chrome, vs. 31.0.1650.63 m (German) with just some addons:
Avast! Onlline Security
Screen Grab
Feedly
Fresh Start
FVD Downloader
Smartr
Vanilla Download manager
Opera, vs.18.0.1284.68, stabile version (German), with just two addons:
Avast! Onlline Security
FVD Downloader
Firefox 26.0 on the desktop system, Waterfox 26.0 on the 64-bit Laptop system (German), both French, with just a couple of addons:
Avast! Onlline Security
NoScript
WOT
FVD Downloader
Google Cache Tool
PDF Architect Converter
Sound Cloud
Microsoft Internet Explorer 11.0.9600.16476IS (German)
Avast! Onlline Security
WOT
PDF Architect Converter
Abode
I have been testing out USMB with all four browsers a lot since I joined, just to see the speed of each browser.
It appears to me that one should often empty the Google Chrome cache and then USMB runs pretty smoothly. But Google Chome launches each embedded add-on as an app with the name google.exe if you look iinto your windows task manager under "processes". Other browsers do this as well, but Chrome, which can be fast, tends to gum up the works the longer it runs.
Also, going to websites with lost of java applications on them while browsing through USMB can be a real problem with Google Chrome.
And a couple of times, just to be sure, I "flushed" the DNS cache.
Information about this here:
DNS Cache Flush, Clear, or Reset in Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8. | a Tech-Recipes Tutorial
I really, really dislike MSIE. It is like a dinosaur.
Firefox seems stabile and works fine.
Opera is BLAZINGLY fast with USMB. And if people haven't given the newest Opera (18) a try, I can heartily recommend it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would appreciate it if other members would give input on how their browsers react with USMB.
Google Chrome, vs. 31.0.1650.63 m (German) with just some addons:
Avast! Onlline Security
Screen Grab
Feedly
Fresh Start
FVD Downloader
Smartr
Vanilla Download manager
Opera, vs.18.0.1284.68, stabile version (German), with just two addons:
Avast! Onlline Security
FVD Downloader
Firefox 26.0 on the desktop system, Waterfox 26.0 on the 64-bit Laptop system (German), both French, with just a couple of addons:
Avast! Onlline Security
NoScript
WOT
FVD Downloader
Google Cache Tool
PDF Architect Converter
Sound Cloud
Microsoft Internet Explorer 11.0.9600.16476IS (German)
Avast! Onlline Security
WOT
PDF Architect Converter
Abode
I have been testing out USMB with all four browsers a lot since I joined, just to see the speed of each browser.
It appears to me that one should often empty the Google Chrome cache and then USMB runs pretty smoothly. But Google Chome launches each embedded add-on as an app with the name google.exe if you look iinto your windows task manager under "processes". Other browsers do this as well, but Chrome, which can be fast, tends to gum up the works the longer it runs.
Also, going to websites with lost of java applications on them while browsing through USMB can be a real problem with Google Chrome.
And a couple of times, just to be sure, I "flushed" the DNS cache.
Information about this here:
DNS Cache Flush, Clear, or Reset in Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8. | a Tech-Recipes Tutorial
I really, really dislike MSIE. It is like a dinosaur.
Firefox seems stabile and works fine.
Opera is BLAZINGLY fast with USMB. And if people haven't given the newest Opera (18) a try, I can heartily recommend it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would appreciate it if other members would give input on how their browsers react with USMB.