Speech That is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted."

[Winston]

You guess wrong, moron. He’s still not a criminal.

The **** he isn't. I mean we can discard every thing that happened since he became president. What about that charity, raising money and using it to purchase a painting of himself. I believe he was banned from creating any more charities. Trump University, conning hundreds of people, promising them riches in real estate. Oh, he settled that one, if he wasn't wrong, why settle?
,
I mean he fucked a pornstar and spent over six figures trying to hide it. How sick is that, how nasty is that? This is the person you idolize? Look, I get it. You can overlook things if you believe someone is going to deliver on their promises. But when the **** has Trump delivered? Inflation, no. Employment, no again. Peace, in the Middle East and Ukraine, no. He has nothing, he is the laughing stock of the entire world.

 

[BackAgain]

The **** he isn't. I mean we can discard every thing that happened since he became president. What about that charity, raising money and using it to purchase a painting of himself. I believe he was banned from creating any more charities. Trump University, conning hundreds of people, promising them riches in real estate. Oh, he settled that one, if he wasn't wrong, why settle?
,
I mean he fucked a pornstar and spent over six figures trying to hide it. How sick is that, how nasty is that? This is the person you idolize? Look, I get it. You can overlook things if you believe someone is going to deliver on their promises. But when the **** has Trump delivered? Inflation, no. Employment, no again. Peace, in the Middle East and Ukraine, no. He has nothing, he is the laughing stock of the entire world.

He is not a criminal.

His conviction won’t stand.

And you’re off lost in a wasteland arguing that his charities were criminal.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You are taking "black women don't have brain processing power" out of context.

He was talking specifically about television presenter Joy Reid; former first lady Michelle Obama; then-U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat from Texas; and Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

.

All of whom have proven the extent of their ignorance.

.

 

[scruffy]

Yes, we know you want a white world only in the USA.

Democrats - keeping racism alive.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Then why did Trump become a criminal?

Why did you become a drug addict?

 

[ThisIsMe]

So, what is speech that is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted" to a leftist? It is an important question because those words are used a great deal by the Left to label things they don't like or agree with.

As far as I can tell, those words are assigned to any idea a progressive does not want to debate or discuss.

Ive heard it said "hate speech is any speech they hate".

Is the Left's cognitive dissonance so strong that cannot even hear another point of view?

I do believe it is. I mean, we all suffer from to some extent, but, I think its a little worse on the left.

Why are opposing points of view so threatening that you engage in negatively labelling any speech you don't like, or engaging in Lawfare, silencing people, and in extremely cases murder to silence them?


Discuss.

I think we should be open to ideas to at least talk about them. Nobody will always agree on everything, but we have to at least try to talk. Everything breaks down when we stop talking.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Yes, we know you want a white world only in the USA.

Where, in any of his post, did you come up with that?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Then why did Trump become a criminal?

Well trump did start out as a lefty so......

 

[ThisIsMe]

What utter horseshit. Yes, Kirk was a racist. "When I see a black pilot". He was a bigot, "black women don't have brain processing power." And while he may not have been a fascist he was a Christian Nationalist, not really seeing much of a difference.

And as far as silencing dissent, refusing to debate, project much? And your leader, does he not attempt to silence dissent? Or even Kirk, what is so scary about a liberal professor? Did Kirk invite any of the professors on his list to debate him, or did he just want to debate children?

Wow, so many people who only listen to sound bites and never the full conversation kirk was making. I'll assume you also have never actually watched any of kirks videos and just listen to whatever sound bite lefty media shows you.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Watch college students kick Kirk's ass, over and over again.

Lol, you think its easy to have an open, unstructured debate where anyone can come up and start talking about any topic under the sun?

Yeah, kirk had a tough debate there, but here's the difference, each of those students had to only come prepared with one topic, the topic they wanted to talk about that they probably spent weeks fine tuning, kirk had to be ready for up to 400 potential topics, or however many students there were there.

Put kirk on a structured debate stage with a month to hone his argument of just a few topics and I bet he would have been almost impossible to defeat.

It takes a lot of brain power to host those open "taking all questions" kind of debates, because you have to be prepared for anything.

 

[Winston]

Lol, you think its easy to have an open, unstructured debate where anyone can come up and start talking about any topic under the sun?

Yeah, kirk had a tough debate there, but here's the difference, each of those students had to only come prepared with one topic, the topic they wanted to talk about that they probably spent weeks fine tuning, kirk had to be ready for up to 400 potential topics, or however many students there were there.

Put kirk on a structured debate stage with a month to hone his argument of just a few topics and I bet he would have been almost impossible to defeat.

It takes a lot of brain power to host those open "taking all questions" kind of debates, because you have to be prepared for anything.

LOL. While it takes a bit of thinking, Kirk's open debates were not that impressive. He developed a pattern, a template, and those Cambridge students were not falling for it.

And Kirk, on a structured debate stage? That is absolutely comical. 8/4 with a 3 minute cross-x. Do you have any idea what that even means? Even a high school team would have decimated him.

 

[Winston]

He is not a criminal.

His conviction won’t stand.

And you’re off lost in a wasteland arguing that his charities were criminal.

Seriously?

Trump was required to agree to 19 admissions, acknowledging his personal misuse of funds at the Trump Foundation, and agreed to restrictions on future charitable service and ongoing reporting to the Office of the Attorney General, in the event he creates a new charity. The settlement also included mandatory training requirements for Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Eric Trump, which the three children have already undergone. Finally, the settlement required the Trump Foundation to shutter its doors last December and dissolve under court supervision.

Donald J. Trump Pays Court-Ordered $2 Million For Illegally Using Trump Foundation Funds

Trump Ordered to Pay Eight Separate Charities $250,000 Each Remaining $1.8 Million in Trump Foundation Bank Account Disbursed Among Charities NEW YORK – New

ag.ny.gov

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=JLJih9v_PLUS_EKSuJs36THzexg==&system=prod

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Yes, we know you want a white world only in the USA.

Well, great job proving his point.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

LOL. While it takes a bit of thinking, Kirk's open debates were not that impressive. He developed a pattern, a template, and those Cambridge students were not falling for it.

And Kirk, on a structured debate stage? That is absolutely comical. 8/4 with a 3 minute cross-x. Do you have any idea what that even means? Even a high school team would have decimated him.

Post a link of him losing an argument. And I don’t mean just someone calling him names and running off.

 

[Winston]

Post a link of him losing an argument. And I don’t mean just someone calling him names and running off.

I believe the Cambridge video shows Kirk losing.

 

[BackAgain]

Seriously?

Trump was required to agree to 19 admissions, acknowledging his personal misuse of funds at the Trump Foundation, and agreed to restrictions on future charitable service and ongoing reporting to the Office of the Attorney General, in the event he creates a new charity. The settlement also included mandatory training requirements for Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Eric Trump, which the three children have already undergone. Finally, the settlement required the Trump Foundation to shutter its doors last December and dissolve under court supervision.

Donald J. Trump Pays Court-Ordered $2 Million For Illegally Using Trump Foundation Funds

Trump Ordered to Pay Eight Separate Charities $250,000 Each Remaining $1.8 Million in Trump Foundation Bank Account Disbursed Among Charities NEW YORK – New

ag.ny.gov

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=JLJih9v_PLUS_EKSuJs36THzexg==&system=prod

No. Perfectly serious.

Civil wrongs aren’t “criminal.”

Please consider being reasonable. It isn’t likely to kill you. Really.

 

[ThisIsMe]

LOL. While it takes a bit of thinking, Kirk's open debates were not that impressive. He developed a pattern, a template, and those Cambridge students were not falling for it.

Again, its difficult to have to prepare for any and every question. There's no way you can prepare for that. You have to have a vast knowledge base to be able to even begin to approach that.

And Kirk, on a structured debate stage? That is absolutely comical. 8/4 with a 3 minute cross-x. Do you have any idea what that even means? Even a high school team would have decimated him.

I disagree. If he can hold his own on an open topic debate, imagine what he could do if he knew the topics ahead of time.

 

[JWBooth]

So, what is speech that is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted" to a leftist? It is an important question because those words are used a great deal by the Left to label things they don't like or agree with.

As far as I can tell, those words are assigned to any idea a progressive does not want to debate or discuss. It is mentally lazy and reeks of cowardice. Because we don't have to agree with each other, but can you talk about the ideas and present a different point of view? Why is that so difficult?

Many left-wing posters here instantly label Charlie Kirk as a racist, fascist, or bigot. When you try to engage them in his actual ideas, they get angry, dismissive, and throw around even more pejoratives. It's like they cannot help themselves.

Is the Left's cognitive dissonance so strong that cannot even hear another point of view? Why are opposing points of view so threatening that you engage in negatively labelling any speech you don't like, or engaging in Lawfare, silencing people, and in extremely cases murder to silence them?


Discuss.

Meanwhile

 

[JWBooth]

 

[Mack The Finger]

Chess is racist because white always moves first !​

​

Texas Tech student arrested, expelled after video shows her 'mocking' Charlie Kirk vigil: officials​

When he asks her why she is being hateful, she turns her phone on him and fires back, "Why are you so hateful?" several times.

Camryn Giselle Booker then plays the race card, "You’re calling me aggressive because I’m a Black woman."

Texas Tech student arrested, expelled after video shows her 'mocking' Charlie Kirk vigil: officials

Camryn Booker, a Texas Tech student, was arrested for assault and expelled from the university after disrupting a vigil for Charlie Kirk, prompting Governor Abbott's response.

www.foxnews.com