Speech That is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted."

What utter horseshit. Yes, Kirk was a racist. "When I see a black pilot". He was a bigot, "black women don't have brain processing power." And while he may not have been a fascist he was a Christian Nationalist, not really seeing much of a difference.

And as far as silencing dissent, refusing to debate, project much? And your leader, does he not attempt to silence dissent? Or even Kirk, what is so scary about a liberal professor? Did Kirk invite any of the professors on his list to debate him, or did he just want to debate children?


Then by your definition a child murdered Kirk. Too bad he was too chicken shit to debate him. It definitely would have been better for everyone, am I right?
 
vgggghhhhhhhh.webp
 
What utter horseshit. Yes, Kirk was a racist. "When I see a black pilot". He was a bigot, "black women don't have brain processing power." And while he may not have been a fascist he was a Christian Nationalist, not really seeing much of a difference.

And as far as silencing dissent, refusing to debate, project much? And your leader, does he not attempt to silence dissent? Or even Kirk, what is so scary about a liberal professor? Did Kirk invite any of the professors on his list to debate him, or did he just want to debate children?
Professors have shown up at these gatherings, but most don't have the guts. You can't win a debate with lies. Transgenderism is a lie. The professors know this shit is a lie, but the students are immature mush brains that are generally entitled pawns. Too many stories of good kids being sent off to college only to return home as a brain-washed nutty leftist looney activist.
 


Watch college students kick Kirk's ass, over and over again.

Wait...what???? :rolleyes-41:

I didn't see any ass kicking whatsoever.

What I did see and acknowledge is the the students are getting a much better education
at Cambridge than the students are at the woke Ivy League colleges here in the US.
 
Last edited:
A leftist here posted 10 things Charlie Kirk said that he labelled as "racist and bigoted." I read the statements and found almost all of them to be fairly mainstream and non-controversial. I would confidently say half of America would agree with his point of view. One statement being a biological man is not a woman. He cannot ever give birth. He cannot breast feed.

When I said this to the Leftist poster, he would not discuss the statements or debate. He immediately called me a racist and a homophobe. :lol:

Why are opposing ideas so threatening to the Left? It is an interesting question.
Democrats use hate labels so they don't have to defend their views, and when hate labels fail they jump to the "TRUMP's a convicted felon...".
 


Watch college students kick Kirk's ass, over and over again.


Just watched about 15 minutes and Kirk seems to be holding his own. Either way if you feel Kirk lost in the debates can you at least acknowledge his promoting the session as productive for open dialog?
In all the debates I've watch with Kirk, he doesn't edit clips to misrepresent the questioner.
 
Last edited:
The left's entire existence is all dependent on the "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted" industry.
You nailed it, they think if they spew them enough that it becomes the truth.
Then the nuts come out and step up to the plate.
Then the left loons come out and say they didn't see this coming.
 
You nailed it, they think if they spew them enough that it becomes the truth.
Then the nuts come out and step up to the plate.
Then the left loons come out and say they didn't see this coming.
And the deceased caused his demise
 
Just watched about 15 minutes and Kirk seems to be holding his own. Either way if you feel Kirk lost in the debates can you at least acknowledge his promoting the session as productive for open dialog?
In all the debates I've watch with Kirk, he doesn't edit clips to misrepresent the questioner.
In the very beginning, he attempts to deflect criticism and attack. It is his style, and Southpark, those guys are genius, seized on that and lampooned it. What was noticeable about the Colombian students, they saw through that. And Kirk was kind of disoriented.

Look, I haven't seen a real debate in ******* years. First of all, a real debate requires a resolution. A statement, concerning an issue. It always starts with "Resolved", like "Resolved", immigrants take more from this nation than they give". That would be a great place to start.

So, you have two sides. The affirmative and the negative. The affirmative supports the resolution, agrees with the resolution. But, that is not enough. They have to propose a plan to fix the damn problem. I was a great affirmative. You got to think outside of the box.

But the negative. They got it easy. They can claim there is no problem, that is the responsibility of the first negative. They can claim that the affirmative side does not address the problem, that is called non-topical. They can even agree, there is a problem, and propose an alternative plan. Boy howdy, do that shit and watch the affirmative team look like a deer in headlights.

The point here is simple. You can't complain about problems without proposing solutions. And you damn well better be prepared to defend those solutions. Not seeing it under the status quo.
 
What utter horseshit. Yes, Kirk was a racist. "When I see a black pilot". He was a bigot, "black women don't have brain processing power." And while he may not have been a fascist he was a Christian Nationalist, not really seeing much of a difference.

And as far as silencing dissent, refusing to debate, project much? And your leader, does he not attempt to silence dissent? Or even Kirk, what is so scary about a liberal professor? Did Kirk invite any of the professors on his list to debate him, or did he just want to debate children?

You are taking "black women don't have brain processing power" out of context.

He was talking specifically about television presenter Joy Reid; former first lady Michelle Obama; then-U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat from Texas; and Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
 
You are taking "black women don't have brain processing power" out of context.

He was talking specifically about television presenter Joy Reid; former first lady Michelle Obama; then-U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat from Texas; and Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
That doesn't make it any less racist. A college dropout condemning the brain power of Ivy League school graduates. Jackson graduated from Harvard magna cum laude. Michelle graduate from Princeton cum laude. They don't give those distinctions out based on race.
 
15th post
Yes, he is a convicted felon, which is a criminal.
They always have an excuse. I mean I don't understand. Trump is stupid, he really is. His vocabulary sucks, it hurts my brain to watch him speak. I do have sympathy, sympathy for someone that mentally ill. But enough is enough. He created a charity, raised money and then used it to pay for a painting of himself to be displayed in one of his clubs. WTF?

How many bankruptcies has he had? Leaving contractors and investors holding the bag. I mean only a fool would work for him and that is clearly demonstrated by his current staff and cabinet. Fools, each and every one. And in the private sector, well that might be alright. But in the public sector, with real lives affected, it is an abomination.

He is no leader. More like a mob boss. And make no mistake, he is driving this country into the ground. There is no Make America Great Again going on. It was a stupid, and insulting, statement from the get go. It is more like turn America into a third world country, and Trump is making great progress in that area.

I mean Putin has played Trump like a fool. Is it not obvious. And Trump is the tiny little boy, wrapped up in a fatass slob's body, that his supporters adore. It is just ******* sad. I mean we need a real leader to step up and honestly, I ain't seeing one on the horizon. We are lost.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom