Speech That is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted."

[WelfareQueen]

So, what is speech that is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted" to a leftist? It is an important question because those words are used a great deal by the Left to label things they don't like or agree with.

As far as I can tell, those words are assigned to any idea a progressive does not want to debate or discuss. It is mentally lazy and reeks of cowardice. Because we don't have to agree with each other, but can you talk about the ideas and present a different point of view? Why is that so difficult?

Many left-wing posters here instantly label Charlie Kirk as a racist, fascist, or bigot. When you try to engage them in his actual ideas, they get angry, dismissive, and throw around even more pejoratives. It's like they cannot help themselves.

Is the Left's cognitive dissonance so strong that cannot even hear another point of view? Why are opposing points of view so threatening that you engage in negatively labelling any speech you don't like, or engaging in Lawfare, silencing people, and in extremely cases murder to silence them?


Discuss.

 

[JWBooth]

So, what is speech that is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted" to a leftist?

Anything that doesn’t fit into their shifting mold of acceptability.

 

[Cassandro]

Leftists are criminally insane.

 

[Moonglow]

So, what is speech that is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted" to a leftist? It is an important question because those words are used a great deal by the Left to label things they don't like or agree with.

As far as I can tell, those words are assigned to any idea a progressive does not want to debate or discuss. It is mentally lazy and reeks of cowardice. Because we don't have to agree with each other, but can you talk about the ideas and present a different point of view? Why is that so difficult?

Many left-wing posters here instantly label Charlie Kirk as a racist, fascist, or bigot. When you try to engage them in his actual ideas, they get angry, dismissive, and throw around even more pejoratives. It's like they cannot help themselves.

Is the Left's cognitive dissonance so strong that cannot even hear another point of view? Why are opposing points of view so threatening that you engage in negatively labelling any speech you don't like, or engaging in Lawfare, silencing people, and in extremely cases murder to silence them?


Discuss.

Yes, we know you want a white world only in the USA.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So, what is speech that is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted" to a leftist?

.

It's anything that does not agree with them or their master, the father of lies and hate.

.

 

[Moonglow]

Leftists are criminally insane.

Then why did Trump become a criminal?

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[WelfareQueen]

Anything that doesn’t fit into their shifting mold of acceptability.

A leftist here posted 10 things Charlie Kirk said that he labelled as "racist and bigoted." I read the statements and found almost all of them to be fairly mainstream and non-controversial. I would confidently say half of America would agree with his point of view. One statement being a biological man is not a woman. He cannot ever give birth. He cannot breast feed.

When I said this to the Leftist poster, he would not discuss the statements or debate. He immediately called me a racist and a homophobe.

Why are opposing ideas so threatening to the Left? It is an interesting question.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

View attachment 1161621

.

Right on the money.

REST IN FREEDOM, CHARLIE

.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Yes, we know you want a white world only in the USA.

Example that proves this thread. Checkmate!!

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

A leftist here posted 10 things Charlie Kirk said that he labelled as "racist and bigoted." I read the statements and found almost all of them to be fairly mainstream and non-controversial. I would confidently say half of America would agree with his point of view. One statement being a biological man is not a woman. He cannot ever give birth. He cannot breast feed.

When I said this to the Leftist poster, he would not discuss the statements or debate. He immediately called me a racist and a homophobe.

Why are opposing ideas so threatening to the Left? It is an interesting question.

.

Their master teacher is the father of lies and hate.

They are taught that they must kill, in whatever way they can, anyone who doesn't buy their master's bullshit.

.

 

[WEATHER53]

Most of said speech is just blunt fact assessment and staunch truth telling like that infuriates libs wishful feelings into a murderous rage

 

[Edgetho]

Leftists are criminally insane.

Mostly, they're just simply scum. Not trying to do anything other than point out the truth..... They're scum.

If they're insane, it is because their scumbaggery made them insane.

WHY they're scum could be the greatest discussion in Human History but the fact is -- dimocraps are scum. If you want to attribute it to insanity, that's as good an explanation as any but I don't believe that's it. I think it's partly laziness, partly entitlement, partly jealousy, partly poor upbringing, partly the fault of Academia, partly because there are virtually no repercussions for being a douche, partly......

Mix it all together and, VOILA! You have dimocrap scum. And, they all are

 

[Oddball]

So, what is speech that is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted" to a leftist? It is an important question because those words are used a great deal by the Left to label things they don't like or agree with.

As far as I can tell, those words are assigned to any idea a progressive does not want to debate or discuss. It is mentally lazy and reeks of cowardice. Because we don't have to agree with each other, but can you talk about the ideas and present a different point of view? Why is that so difficult?

Many left-wing posters here instantly label Charlie Kirk as a racist, fascist, or bigot. When you try to engage them in his actual ideas, they get angry, dismissive, and throw around even more pejoratives. It's like they cannot help themselves.

Is the Left's cognitive dissonance so strong that cannot even hear another point of view? Why are opposing points of view so threatening that you engage in negatively labelling any speech you don't like, or engaging in Lawfare, silencing people, and in extremely cases murder to silence them?


Discuss.

You forgot "anti-Semitic" and whatever slur is being tossed the way of the likes of Tom Massie and Rand Paul at the moment..

The "right" shares in this shouting down of differing ideas/opinions as well.

 

[BS Filter]

The pitiful little twats don't realize that they're indoctrinated, not educated. Big difference.

 

[Meister]

Then why did Trump become a criminal?

Because of a kangaroo court. Which that verdict will be reversed.

 

[BS Filter]

A leftist here posted 10 things Charlie Kirk said that he labelled as "racist and bigoted." I read the statements and found almost all of them to be fairly mainstream and non-controversial. I would confidently say half of America would agree with his point of view. One statement being a biological man is not a woman. He cannot ever give birth. He cannot breast feed.

When I said this to the Leftist poster, he would not discuss the statements or debate. He immediately called me a racist and a homophobe.

Why are opposing ideas so threatening to the Left? It is an interesting question.

Cultic mentality. Everyone in the history of this planet has believed there are two genders. Now suddenly we have an entire generation that believes you can be whatever gender you desire. Indoctrination.

 

[Winston]

So, what is speech that is "Hateful, Racist, Fascist, and Bigoted" to a leftist? It is an important question because those words are used a great deal by the Left to label things they don't like or agree with.

As far as I can tell, those words are assigned to any idea a progressive does not want to debate or discuss. It is mentally lazy and reeks of cowardice. Because we don't have to agree with each other, but can you talk about the ideas and present a different point of view? Why is that so difficult?

Many left-wing posters here instantly label Charlie Kirk as a racist, fascist, or bigot. When you try to engage them in his actual ideas, they get angry, dismissive, and throw around even more pejoratives. It's like they cannot help themselves.

Is the Left's cognitive dissonance so strong that cannot even hear another point of view? Why are opposing points of view so threatening that you engage in negatively labelling any speech you don't like, or engaging in Lawfare, silencing people, and in extremely cases murder to silence them?


Discuss.

What utter horseshit. Yes, Kirk was a racist. "When I see a black pilot". He was a bigot, "black women don't have brain processing power." And while he may not have been a fascist he was a Christian Nationalist, not really seeing much of a difference.

And as far as silencing dissent, refusing to debate, project much? And your leader, does he not attempt to silence dissent? Or even Kirk, what is so scary about a liberal professor? Did Kirk invite any of the professors on his list to debate him, or did he just want to debate children?

 

[Winston]

Because of a kangaroo court. Which that verdict will be reversed.

Perfect example. No discussion of the merits of the case. A "kangaroo court", you mean like the SCOTUS? Perfectly indoctrinated.

 

[Meister]

What utter horseshit. Yes, Kirk was a racist. "When I see a black pilot". He was a bigot, "black women don't have brain processing power." And while he may not have been a fascist he was a Christian Nationalist, not really seeing much of a difference.

And as far as silencing dissent, refusing to debate, project much? And your leader, does he not attempt to silence dissent? Or even Kirk, what is so scary about a liberal professor? Did Kirk invite any of the professors on his list to debate him, or did he just want to debate children?

Kirk did debate some professors on his college tour.