Special Grand Jury approved in Fulton County election probe

[BWK]

A "special purpose" grand jury that can't bring an indictment. Lol. Don't see that one in the Constitution.

We'll see what they think when they listen to the whole hour-long call and get it in context.

The media are lying about Trump's phone call with Raffensperger

The mainstream media and Georgia's secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, are utterly disgraceful, dishonest, and manipulative people. Raffensperger released a private phone call that the media immediately claimed — falsely &mda...

www.americanthinker.com

Did American Thinker forget to tell us that with Trumps own voice, that he needed 11,780 votes? He didn't ask Raffensberger to find the missing votes, he asked him to produce that many. "Come on,11,000 votes, give me a break." A break? LOl! You mean let's cheat. Did American Thinker include all that? Of course not. You are as dishonest as American Thinker.

By the way, how do you show massive fraud from a telephone conversation; Instead, Trump was operating from the assertion that he won Georgia. He opened the call with a strong recitation of the facts showing massive fraud on Raffensperger's watch. According to Trump's evidence, he didn't lose by 11,780 votes; he won by well over 300,000 votes, including votes for Trump that disappeared and illegal votes for Biden. Here are some of Trump's statements in that regard:?

Where is the evidence Trump is talking about? No where. Trump lied.

 

[BWK]

Then why are Democrats against it?

Can you not read? 81%! How can Democrats be against it? Answer, because they are not.

 

[Lastamender]

Can you not read? 81%! How can Democrats be against it? Answer, because they are not.

The politicians that represent them are. They ignore what their constituents want and always have.

 

[BWK]

The politicians that represent them are. They ignore what their constituents want and always have.

That's not what you said before. You're moving the goal posts. You said, "then why are Democrats against it?" Do you see how dishonest your question is? When you say "Democrats" that's all Democrats. You are too much of a liar here to have an intelligent argument.

 

[Lastamender]

That's not what you said before. You're moving the goal posts. You said, "then why are Democrats against it?" Do you see how dishonest your question is? When you say "Democrats" that's all Democrats. You are too much of a liar here to have an intelligent argument.

GFY. You are a lying shill that has never had an original thought of his own.

 

[BWK]

GFY. You are a lying shill that has never had an original thought of his own.

See how easy this is to bury you. Folks, I declare victory over this chronic loser. How? Because he never says shit. Lol!

 

[Lastamender]

See how easy this is to bury you. Folks, I declare victory over this chronic loser. How? Because he never says shit. Lol!

What do you think you have won you incredibly small minded pissant?

 

[theHawk]

A special grand jury has been granted in Fulton County's Trump investigation

The decision comes after Fulton District Attorney Fani Willis requested one. A special grand jury has subpoena power and the authority to obtain documents. It will begin on May 2.

www.npr.org

This is going to keep trump up at night. The judge who approved this must have seen some convincing evidence that, at the very least, state law was broken when trump and his associates tried to cheat the vote count in Georgia. The repub wall of silence will come down when the Grand Jury issues subpoenas. This from the article:

Last week, Fulton DA Fani Willis requested the special grand jury, which has subpoena power and the authority to obtain documents. Willis said several witnesses or potential witnesses — including Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger — have refused to cooperate with the probe absent a subpoena.

LOL, “cheat the vote”. Uh-huh.

 

[BWK]

LOL, “cheat the vote”. Uh-huh.

"Cheat the vote?"

 

[Lastamender]

"Cheat the vote?"

Debunked.

 

[BWK]

Debunked.

You're a liar. Get lost loser.

 

[Lastamender]

You're a liar. Get lost loser.

Troll has a sad?

 

[BWK]

Troll has a sad?

The kitchen is too hot for you. You have no defense of Trump.

 

[Lastamender]

The kitchen is too hot for you. You have no defense of Trump.

Trump can defend himself. You haven't figured that out yet, moron?

 

[BWK]

Debunked.

No link provided debunking it. You're a loser.

 

[BWK]

Trump can defend himself. You haven't figured that out yet, moron?

Has he? How many times has he had to settle in civil lawsuits against him? Of the 3,500 suits, Trump or one of his companies were plaintiffs in 1,900; defendants in 1,450; and bankruptcy, third party, or other in 150.[1] Trump was named in at least 169 suits in federal court.[2] Over 150 other cases were in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida (covering Broward County, Florida) since 1983.[3] In the 1,300 cases where the record establishes the outcome, Trump settled 175 times, lost 38, won 450, and had another 137 cases end with some other outcome. In the other 500 cases, judges dismissed plaintiffs' claims against Trump.[1] Trump hasn't defended himself very well. And now, with the sedition, obstruction, and his own election fraud attempts, those are much more serious crimes, that are not financial.

 

[Lastamender]

Has he? How many times has he had to settle in civil lawsuits against him? Of the 3,500 suits, Trump or one of his companies were plaintiffs in 1,900; defendants in 1,450; and bankruptcy, third party, or other in 150.[1] Trump was named in at least 169 suits in federal court.[2] Over 150 other cases were in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida (covering Broward County, Florida) since 1983.[3] In the 1,300 cases where the record establishes the outcome, Trump settled 175 times, lost 38, won 450, and had another 137 cases end with some other outcome. In the other 500 cases, judges dismissed plaintiffs' claims against Trump.[1] Trump hasn't defended himself very well. And now, with the sedition, obstruction, and his own election fraud attempts, those are much more serious crimes, that are not financial.

The election was stolen. One thing Trump proved is just how corrupt our government is. And the politicians have done nothing to change that.

 

[BWK]

The election was stolen. One thing Trump proved is just how corrupt our government is. And the politicians have done nothing to change that.

Another non-existent argument. You say nothing. You've proved nothing. You're a broken record. It's pitiful. You are totally incapable of engaging with other humans. I could have a more intelligent discussion with a dog than you.

 

[Lastamender]

Another non-existent argument. You say nothing. You've proved nothing. You're a broken record. It's pitiful. You are totally incapable of engaging with other humans. I could have a more intelligent discussion with a dog than you.

Hardly non-existence. You refuse to accept the real evidence of the laws that were broken and the regulations ignored in at least 4 of the swing states. Those elections had 0 integrity and it can be easily proven. Their own records and data prove it.

 

[BWK]

Hardly non-existence. You refuse to accept the real evidence of the laws that were broken and the regulations ignored in at least 4 of the swing states. Those elections had 0 integrity and it can be easily proven. Their own records and data prove it.

No laws broken and no regulations ignored.

"It can be easily proven"? Not by you it won't.