I wasn't trying to negate that fact. I probably know more about it than both of you combined as I have BEEN there over 20 times in the past 18 years, am intimately involved with a Latin family, and have seen first hand and heard straight from the mouths of real South Americans what goes on there. It's a shame if real experience is merely "anecdotal" to you. But the fact of the matter is the Chinese influence has been the most detrimental as of late, and the average natives clearly prefer our touch over theirs. The rise of socialism in Venezuela resulted in good American employers (such as Heinz) leaving, and what they got in return was Chavez's regime. Hugo Chavez drew directly on China as a role model for his regime in his his first year in office. Read about it. Just a few years later, neighboring countries were suffering from the fallout of the collapse of that regime which includes illegal immigration and crime on an alarming scale, including a massive increase in human trafficking. There are particular countries, Chile especially, which have been favored by American corporations. This also affects neighboring economies who have NOT had so much American corporate influence, and they can't compete with Americanized Chile. It gets dirty. American fishing companies in Chile were sending their Chilean fishermen into Peruvian waters to take Peruvian fish. And many corporations in Peru are actually Chilean and backed by American dollars. This is destroying Peru's economic autonomy although recent things have happened there to push back on it. I have been in Peru on election day TWICE. I hear what the people say and have also seen the changes in that place first hand. I didn't have to read about it in some leftist paper like you did. So see, I know quite a bit about both sides of this track. My family is mingling with Latin America goes way back to the early 20th century when that great grandfather was a coffee buyer for the Atlantic-Pacific tea company. He was a real honcho and was invited by the owners of a coffee plantation in South America to move in with them and marry into their family at one point. That didn't happen, but my great-grandfather brought back a wealth of experience from his mingling with those people which was eventually shared with the whole family. I also had an uncle who spent three years working on fishing boats in Mexico in the 60s. I have sort of become an heir to that legacy myself, as I am now considering trying to open business opportunities in Peru, beneficial to all parties involved. If and when that finally happens, you can rest assured that I will be trying to serve lower middle class families like the one that I married into from Peru, not so much rich American businessman back in the States trying to turn the highest profit possible at those people's expense..... although I will certainly have to learn to negotiate with them.
Gipper's original post is loose and unidimensional, and obviously tries to make it seem as though these Latin-American countries are going to China because the US is being so bad to them. There are farms in Peru which export to countries like the US and make an absolute killing on their crops doing so. Meanwhile none of that produce actually makes it into the mouths of Peruvian people at the prices they ought to be. I just came back from Peru two months ago. Already a local asparagus farm on the outskirts of my wife's hometown is getting ready to redirect its surplus as a result of the tariffs into the Peruvian markets. This is good for Peru, no? Well my guess is you haven't spent that much time there gaining anecdotal experience of your own like I have, so you wouldn't realize this from the filtered liberal sources you guys read. It may not be good for the corporate owners, they may have to step down from a BMW to a Honda now, but now they will be forced to serve the Peruvian people instead of greedy entitled Americans. Things Trump is doing is causing a lot of lines to shift on the map. It's a shake up and everyone will feel it. And as a result corporate owners will be forced to step down a bit in status while the lower class workers will be allowed to step up a little when surpluses in their own countries force prices down there. Just like this will gradually for us American corporations to set up closer to home, it will force foreign production to focus their marketing closer to home as well.
It's just that when I hear people like Gipper trying to sound so smart it really sets me off knowing what I know first hand. And I really love how people like you dismiss my family's more than century old direct experience with Latin American as"anecdotal", while reading second hand, biased, filtered journalism on the topic and acting like youre experts on it. Ive met a good number of lower middle class people in Peru, Columbia and Panama who would like to tell you right where it's at.