Sorry to burst your bubble, but...: In Re: Judicial Impeachment

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because whites represent a larger segment of the population than blacks. As a proportion of our population, we commit less crime than blacks do.

Your studies don't involve basic math, do they?
And here we see the use of faulty math to excuse white crime.

“We are allowed to commit more crime because there are more of us.” If this is not lunacy, then what is?

The problem with this opinion is if you multiply things by 5 to make the populations the same, there are things that no longer exist for blacks. We would have more economic opportunities. We would have equal representation relative to the number of police, lawyers, judges, and political representatives. Increased black representation affects public policy formation, law enforcement, and legislation. Crime would reduce because of the increased opportunities; wealth would increase, and poverty would be dramatically reduced. Long-needed community improvements would be initiated in blighted communities, which would increase property value, creating additional funding for schools in those communities.

The number of blacks entering and graduating college now rises to the same level as whites. These increases result in a more highly trained and qualified black workforce. Blacks would have the same number of businesses, and those businesses would be staffed with black employees. This increase in jobs lowers black unemployment to the same rate as whites. Fewer blacks would be on government assistance because they now have stable employment. Things would be dramatically different. Yet to the racist, nothing else changes except that crime increases.

Whites numerically commit more crimes. Period. One victim of a crime committed by a black person doesn't turn into five crimes just because there are more whites. It's time whites such as you stopped the excuses and faced the problems you guys have.
 
Not planning on it. But he keeps giving me his rear, and I keep giving it back to him.
.

As we progress deeper into a whole FOUR LONG GLORIOUS MAGA YEARS, it will be fun to watch the exploding heads and nervous breakdowns.


.
 
That is a reality you are too much of a coward to face.
Your cowardice stems from the inability to acknowledge a reality where racism is nowhere near a problem today as it was 60 years ago.

You're stuck in time, in your own little "whites are wayciss!!" bubble. Grow up, old man.
 
Last edited:
“We are allowed to commit more crime because there are more of us.” If this is not lunacy, then what is?
I never said that. I never said our greater numbers give us carte blanche to commit more crimes as we please.

What you seem to miss is that all crime is wrong and that it knows no race or ethnicity.

I dirty myself getting into the whole "black v. white" nonsense with you. But you are in a special kind of stupid mode today.
 
Last edited:
Your cowardice stems from the inability to acknowledge a reality where racism is nowhere near a problem today as it was 60 years ago.

You're stuck in time. In your own little "whites are wayciss" bubble. Grow up, old man.
I'm living in the modern reality whites like you lie about.

1742419906049.webp


Following the 2024 Election, media coverage has been dominated by newspapers seeking to articulate how Donald Trump won the election.1 As a part of this coverage, there is a noticeable rise in articles on the shift in Black and Latino votes for Trump with titles such as “Trump’s return to power fueled by Hispanic, working-class voter support,” and lines like “some surprising margins . . . within groups including women, Black and Latino voters helped carry the former president to victory.”2 While it is certainly important to recognize shifts in the voting patterns of people of color and what that means, the media framing that seeks to attribute Trump’s victory to people of color is concerning because it seemingly blames those who will be most devastated by a second Trump term for his victory.

To be clear, Trump’s voting coalition is overwhelmingly composed of white voters. Approximately 84% of the votes for Trump in 2024 were cast by white voters.3 While it is true that some voters of color shifted towards Donald Trump, Kamala Harris still received the majority of votes cast by people of color, and received 83% of the votes cast by Black voters.4 Articles seeking to understand how people of color may have “fueled” Trump’s victory miss the forest for the trees. Current articles mirror phenomena in victim-blaming discourse where “there is a lack of tendency to blame the environment” and instead a “tend[ency] to blame specific victims.”5

Donald Trump won the 2024 election despite running the most racist presidential campaign in history, despite his long history of racial slurs and comments (such as claiming that Kamala Harris “turn[ed] Black”), and despite hosting rallies where speakers regularly gave remarks containing racist dog whistles on stage.6 This phenomenon, where voters voted for Trump despite his racist actions, suggests that in spite of arguments to the contrary, the United States of America is still wrestling with issues of white supremacy and racial bias.


I'm grown little boy. Take your own advice and grow up. Just because you're white and make a declaration doesn't make it true or reality. White racism is problem right now and you are just another example of modern white racism.
 
I'll put it plainly. The founders had greater faith in the judiciary when they crafted Article III than we do today. So, in Article 1, Section 3 they set a two-thirds threshold by the Senate to impeach a judge (or the president, vice president, and all other civil officers.) That's 67 votes. And by my tally, Republicans don't have the votes, nor will Democrats cooperate.

So, may it behoove my conservative friends to stop wasting their breath on something that will never happen? At this point, it's an impossibility. Don't waste your breath. Leave all these TROs and injunctions in the hands of the Supreme Court. If the administration's case is sound, these judges will be left with egg on their faces.
Impeachment threats do make activist judges lose sleep. Its psychological warfare. It also makes this specific judges life much harder and stressful, even if there isnt a shot that it will actually get him impeached. Its embarrassing to have your credibility as a judge brought into question on a national scale. Most of his family and friends wont change their opinions about him, but some will question his competence, and he wont know who is thinking what. It sucks to be in that position.

I say we ramp up the calls for his impeachment.
 
Impeachment takes a simple majority of the House. Conviction takes 2/3 of the Senate.

It doesn't matter anyway. Just impeaching a Judge, even without a conviction, will cause him/her/it to step down.
Bananna republic much?
 
I never said that. I never said our greater numbers give us carte blanche to commit more crimes as we please.

What you seem to miss is that all crime is wrong and that it knows no race or ethnicity.

I dirty myself getting into the whole "black v. white" nonsense with you. But you are in a special kind of stupid mode today.
That is exactly what you are saying. I don't miss anything and I'm not the one who brought up black-on-black crime. You did. Son, I've studied this stuff for more than 4 decades. Your arguments are based on your feelings, not facts. It is sed n empirical evidence as well as lived experience being black in America. What you have exhibited called white fragility and that's a term created by a white individual after years of giving workshops on racial sensitivity for corporations.

Before you deny the behavior. Go study what white fragility is and then analyze your conversation with me today.
 
He said judges should not be impeached because you don't like their decisions which can be appealed to a higher court. That is what he actually said and is 100% correct. Even my wife told me I was right on that point.
You are like a blind squirrel that finally found an acorn.
 
That is exactly what you are saying. I don't miss anything and I'm not the one who brought up black-on-black crime
No, really, you bring up race every chance you get. Tying it to almost every societal ill blacks face, then pin in on Whites.

Instead of fighting racism, you're engaging in it. You ignore your own race's internal struggles and flaws, and somehow, delusionally, seem to think you can address what's wrong with the black race by admonishing the weakness of the white.

You have it all back-asswards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom