Sorry to burst your bubble, but...: In Re: Judicial Impeachment

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, really, you bring up race every chance you get. Tying it to almost every societal ill blacks face, then pin in on Whites.

Instead of fighting racism, you're engaging in it. You ignore your own race's internal struggles and flaws, and somehow, delusionally, seem to think you can address what's wrong with the black race by admonishing the weakness of the white.

You have it all back-asswards.
No, you're just wrong.

Look at where Blacks don't face White Supremacy -- South Africa, Zimbabwe, Somalia, Liberia, Malawi, Nigeria, Burundi and Sudan.

Why -- They're just kicking ass. I think the Central African Republic is getting ready to launch a manned-mission to Alpha Centauri (C) in the next few Months.

In fact, it is known fact that if it hadn't been for Whitey, Mozambique would have developed FTL (FasterThanLight) Travel.

But Whitey fucked that all up. Somehow. We know we did. Somehow. Not sure how, but we did. And just think about Rhodesia, at one time the bread basket of the entire continent. Blacks took it over and created the highest inflation in human history!!!

That's an accomplishment nobody will ever exceed. Blacks can work miracles when Whitey's not arounf to fuck everything up. Zimbabwe is proof-postive.

:bow2:
 
I'll put it plainly. The founders had greater faith in the judiciary when they crafted Article III than we do today. So, in Article 1, Section 3 they set a two-thirds threshold by the Senate to impeach a judge (or the president, vice president, and all other civil officers.) That's 67 votes. And by my tally, Republicans don't have the votes, nor will Democrats cooperate.

So, may it behoove my conservative friends to stop wasting their breath on something that will never happen? At this point, it's an impossibility. Don't waste your breath. Leave all these TROs and injunctions in the hands of the Supreme Court. If the administration's case is sound, these judges will be left with egg on their faces.
Impeachment should wait until after more democrats are cleaned out in 2026. Now, the attack should be ethics complaints. Every family members, every ruling, every decision should be resurrected and examined for bias. Tie these activist judged up so tightly that they get suspended pending investigation.
 
No, you're just wrong.

Look at where Blacks don't face White Supremacy -- South Africa, Zimbabwe, Somalia, Liberia, Malawi, Nigeria, Burundi and Sudan.

Why -- They're just kicking ass. I think the Central African Republic is getting ready to launch a manned-mission to Alpha Centauri (C) in the next few Months.

In fact, it is known fact that if it hadn't been for Whitey, Mozambique would have developed FTL (FasterThanLight) Travel.

But Whitey fucked that all up. Somehow. We know we did. Somehow. Not sure how, but we did. And just think about Rhodesia, at one time the bread basket of the entire continent. Blacks took it over and created the highest inflation in human history!!!

That's an accomplishment nobody will ever exceed. Blacks can work miracles when Whitey's not arounf to fuck everything up. Zimbabwe is proof-postive.

:bow2:
That amount of sarcasm is admirable! Well done!
 
Intriguing.

But now that they are all aware of such a method, don't count on them employing it.
The threat can be enough if it is shown that we are willing to use it.

Impeachment? So what if it isn't successful. As long as dimocrap scum know we'll use it.

If all we ever do is talk shit, dimocrap scum will never, not ever, change. Ever. That J-6 bullshit? Bondi needs to prosecute them and fuck the phony pardons issued by Sponge Brains Shits Pants' Auto Pen.

So what if we don't win? Seriously. It's that dimocrap scum know we'll back it up.

We all speed when driving our cars. But we all know we can get caught and it's expensive when we do. THAT is what keeps us from doing 90MPH by a school. Not morals, not rrespect for the Law -- The Threat of what will happen if we get caught.

For Republicans, there's no threat of what we might do because -- We never do anything except talk. We do a lot of that.
 
The threat can be enough if it is shown that we are willing to use it.

Impeachment? So what if it isn't successful. As long as dimocrap scum know we'll use it.

If all we ever do is talk shit, dimocrap scum will never, not ever, change. Ever. That J-6 bullshit? Bondi needs to prosecute them and fuck the phony pardons issued by Sponge Brains Shits Pants' Auto Pen.

So what if we don't win? Seriously. It's that dimocrap scum know we'll back it up.

We all speed when driving our cars. But we all know we can get caught and it's expensive when we do. THAT is what keeps us from doing 90MPH by a school. Not morals, not rrespect for the Law -- The Threat of what will happen if we get caught.

For Republicans, there's no threat of what we might do because -- We never do anything except talk. We do a lot of that.
Don't get me wrong, it's a Constitutionally sound method, but I don't think Congress has the cojones to do it.
 
Impeachment should wait until after more democrats are cleaned out in 2026. Now, the attack should be ethics complaints. Every family members, every ruling, every decision should be resurrected and examined for bias. Tie these activist judged up so tightly that they get suspended pending investigation.
Totes disagree with the highlighted part. The other I'm okay with. But Republicans need to do something other than flap their gums
 
Don't get me wrong, it's a Constitutionally sound method, but I don't think Congress has the cojones to do it.

And there you have it. And there goes our Country. Because Republicans are too chicken shit to stand up to the DISGUSTING FILTH. They're afraid of a 110lb reporter
 
I'll put it plainly. The founders had greater faith in the judiciary when they crafted Article III than we do today. So, in Article 1, Section 3 they set a two-thirds threshold by the Senate to impeach a judge (or the president, vice president, and all other civil officers.) That's 67 votes. And by my tally, Republicans don't have the votes, nor will Democrats cooperate.

So, may it behoove my conservative friends to stop wasting their breath on something that will never happen? At this point, it's an impossibility. Don't waste your breath. Leave all these TROs and injunctions in the hands of the Supreme Court. If the administration's case is sound, these judges will be left with egg on their faces.

This idiot judge is going to cost the federal judiciary it's national standing. If Congress passes the bill and it looks like they're going to the federal bench will be busted down to fragments. Frankly they should only be one supreme Court... Right there's about 50 of them.
 
I'll put it plainly. The founders had greater faith in the judiciary when they crafted Article III than we do today. So, in Article 1, Section 3 they set a two-thirds threshold by the Senate to impeach a judge (or the president, vice president, and all other civil officers.) That's 67 votes. And by my tally, Republicans don't have the votes, nor will Democrats cooperate.

So, may it behoove my conservative friends to stop wasting their breath on something that will never happen? At this point, it's an impossibility. Don't waste your breath. Leave all these TROs and injunctions in the hands of the Supreme Court. If the administration's case is sound, these judges will be left with egg on their faces.
It's worth mentioning there are no grounds for impeachment.
 
This idiot judge is going to cost the federal judiciary it's national standing.
Why? Because trumples believe the horseshit people like Pam Bondi and Karoline Leavitt are spewing about the judge? A judge originally nominated to the federal bench by George Bush.
If the judge were half as partisan as he's accused of being he'd have already held the admin in contempt for failing to comply with requests for basic info about the deportations.
Paradoxically, trump has created a constitutional crisis over a matter he has the authority to control. The prez has the power to deport men like the ones sent to El Salvador but only after it proves the allegations they have participated in criminal conduct. It hasn't. Instead, it invoked the Alien Enemies Act which does give the prez the power to deport people without due process in times of war. The problem being the Act is not applicable because we are not at war despite the Right's hyperbolic use of the term "invasion."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom