Sorry to burst your bubble, but...: In Re: Judicial Impeachment

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You asked me this so confidently, assuring yourself there were no examples I could provide. Yet when I do, you aren't willing to discuss.

Well, RW? I'm waiting.

.

That one is a frequent victim of the syndrome, getting scared and running away when calmly confronted.


.

 

[Mac-7]

wasted time, wasted money,

Convinced voters Trump shouldn't be in office.

I think it convinced voters that trump should be in office

 

[TemplarKormac]

.

That one is a frequent victim of the syndrome, getting scared and running away when calmly confronted.


.

That wouldn't be the first time I nailed him to the wall.

 

[BluesLegend]

The founders had greater faith in the judiciary when they crafted Article III than we do today.

Actually the founders were highly distrustful of judges, having suffered under the king's hack judges and injustice. Gingrich was discussing this the other day, referencing the Federalist papers.

 

[BluesLegend]

Also, Roberts can shut his damn pie hole or he'll be the next one IMPEACHED!

We have impeachment precisely to remove dickhead judges like this clown who thinks he controls the POTUS and the country. Push it and find out you lawless Dem assholes.

Also so much for all your BS about respecting democracy. Trump wins in a landslide, sweeping every swing state and the popular vote and you assholes run to your lawless hack judges to subvert THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. We are not surprised.

 

[Foxfyre]

I'll put it plainly. The founders had greater faith in the judiciary when they crafted Article III than we do today. So, in Article 1, Section 3 they set a two-thirds threshold by the Senate to impeach a judge (or the president, vice president, and all other civil officers.) That's 67 votes. And by my tally, Republicans don't have the votes, nor will Democrats cooperate.

So, may it behoove my conservative friends to stop wasting their breath on something that will never happen? At this point, it's an impossibility. Don't waste your breath. Leave all these TROs and injunctions in the hands of the Supreme Court. If the administration's case is sound, these judges will be left with egg on their faces.

The House introduces and votes on Articles of Impeachment. Usually a simple majority vote for impeachment then sends it to the Senate. The Senate convicts the impeached individual and that is where the 2/3rds vote comes in. Once a person has been convicted by that super majority vote, I believe it only takes a simple majority vote to remove the person from office.

But you're right. The Senate does not have the 2/3rds majority necessary to convict an impeached person at this time.

 

[Auld Phart]

I think it convinced voters that trump should be in office

NO

Biden did that,

 

[IM2]

Even if that were true, so are the idiots torching and shooting up Tesla dealerships, but oh, nothing from you.

The rule of law only applies to people you hate, not people you agree with. How utterly pathetic.

I don't have any sympathy for Elon Musk. Fuc him. He's torching peoples entire lives, but we are now all supposed stop and condemn the people burning down his shit. Do not assume things right-winger because the only people your last sentence applies to are you right-wingers. When the people burning his shit up are caught, they will go to trial, get convicted and go to prison. Not one of them will have people defending their crimes claiming they are political witch hunts or lawfare. None of them will be able to run for president, nor will they ever get elected president. None of them incited an insurrection to overthrow the government and if they are caught on tape, there won't be any dipsticks like Tucker editing film in order to try to make it look like these people were innocent tourists. You talk about the rule of law and support Trump? Man, Fuck you.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Actually the founders were highly distrustful of judges, having suffered under the king's hack judges and injustice. Gingrich was discussing this the other day, referencing the Federalist papers.

I don't think they would have conceived of a judiciary like ours, which constantly flouts its boundaries. There were consequences for this kind of malfeasance back then, but not so today.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I don't have any sympathy for Elon Musk. Fuc him. He's torching peoples entire lives, but we are now all supposed stop and condemn the people burning down his shit. Do not assume things right-winger because the only people your last sentence applies to are you right-wingers. When the people burning his shit up are caught, they will go t trial, get convicted and go to prison. Not one of them will have people defending their crimes claiming they political witch hunts or lawfare. None of them will be able to run for president, nor will they ever get elected president. None of them incited an insurrection to overthrow the government and if they are caught on tape, there won't be any dipsticks like Tucker editing film in order to try to make it look like these people were innocent tourists. You talk about the rule of law and support Trump? Man, Fuck you.

Spare me your verbal diarrhea.

Get back to me when you give a damn about black on black crime.

 

[IM2]

Also, Roberts can shut his damn pie hole or he'll be the next one IMPEACHED!

We have impeachment precisely to remove dickhead judges like this clown who thinks he controls the POTUS and the country. Push it and find out you lawless Dem assholes.

Also so much for all your BS about respecting democracy. Trump wins in a landslide, sweeping every swing state and the popular vote and you assholes run to your lawless hack judges to subvert THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. We are not surprised.

Trump didn't win in a landslide. He won by 1.5 percent. Even if he did, that doesn't me him above the law. Trump isn't doing the will of the people and the judiciary does check the executive branch..

 

[TemplarKormac]

The House introduces and votes on Articles of Impeachment. Usually a simple majority vote for impeachment then sends it to the Senate. The Senate convicts the impeached individual and that is where the 2/3rds vote comes in. Once a person has been convicted by that super majority vote, I believe it only takes a simple majority vote to remove the person from office.

But you're right. The Senate does not have the 2/3rds majority necessary to convict an impeached person at this time.

There's a reason I omitted the House from my statement. I addressed the obvious boundary to such an endeavor.

These judges know they can do this and suffer no real consequences. They are quite well aware of the political climate.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I don't have any sympathy for Elon Musk. Fuc him. He's torching peoples entire lives, but we are now all supposed stop and condemn the people burning down his shit. Do not assume things right-winger because the only people your last sentence applies to are you right-wingers. When the people burning his shit up are caught, they will go t trial, get convicted and go to prison. Not one of them will have people defending their crimes claiming they political witch hunts or lawfare. None of them will be able to run for president, nor will they ever get elected president. None of them incited an insurrection to overthrow the government and if they are caught on tape, there won't be any dipsticks like Tucker editing film in order to try to make it look like these people were innocent tourists. You talk about the rule of law and support Trump? Man, Fuck you.

.



It's so entertaining to watch you left cultists pitching this kind of fit.




.

 

[IM2]

Spare me your verbal diarrhea.

Get back to me when you give a damn about black on black crime.

I spent 30 years reducing such crime.

So how about you concern yourself with the vastly higher numbers of white-on-white crime instead of electing white criminals to make laws? Capiche?

 

[BluesLegend]

I don't think they would have conceived of a judiciary like ours, which constantly flouts its boundaries. There were consequences for this kind of malfeasance back then, but not so today.

I think back in the day of the founders judged understood if they got out of line they would be promptly REMOVED!

What pisses me off about these lawless Dem judges is, they know the law. They are trained, licensed lawyers so they know the Constitution and the law and WILLFULLY violate it to push the Dem agenda.

 

[BluesLegend]

There's a reason I omitted the House from my statement. I addressed the obvious boundary to such an endeavor.

These judges know they can do this and suffer no real consequences. They are quite well aware of the political climate.

It's past time to get rid of this 60 vote BS in the Senate.

 

[Foxfyre]

There's a reason I omitted the House from my statement. I addressed the obvious boundary to such an endeavor.

These judges know they can do this and suffer no real consequences. They are quite well aware of the political climate.

That's the truth. That's why I hope somebody with legal standing gets the issue before the Supreme Court so a ruling will stop the kind of lawfare the Democrats are now using with a corrupt court system.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I spent 30 years reducing such crime.

Yet such crime still exists. Even worse than your time. You failed, and I can see why. Your rhetoric doesn't help reduce the crime. It only angers and inflames members of your own race and drives them to commit more crime. You treat them like victims, and emboldened victims are dangerous. Your rhetoric only drives them to seek revenge. It emboldens them to think they are immune from the consequences of their own behavior.

Once again, spare me.

 

[BluesLegend]

.



FOUR LONG GLORIOUS MAGA YEARS




.

Four years of punching Democrats in the face, love it!

 

[Mac-7]

NO

Biden did that,

Sure, that too

Plus Harris