It's not. They know exactly what's going on and they don't care. A lot of them even like it. They want authoritarian government.Not sure why this needs to be such a mystery.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not. They know exactly what's going on and they don't care. A lot of them even like it. They want authoritarian government.Not sure why this needs to be such a mystery.
The court decide that, not the Executive branch.... They can bring him to court but he gets due process....oh come on. "Maryland man" seems to connote the guy was american. he's not. And he should have been deported to some third country years ago.
You have to be willfully ignorant of the facts to write a post like that. He was detained by a Tennessee highway patrol officer on suspicion of human trafficking. No charges were filed. His wife asked for a restraining order against him but never followed thru with formal charges.We probably always have had that, and judges make mistakes too.
But the facts are that the guy fits deportable criteria. His wife charged him with assault, and he's been arrested for suspected human trafficking. He probably shouda been deported to some other third world country willing to take him.
I'm saying that courts should not enter orders that don't have broad support already. The Courts didn't stop lynching or bombing little black girls in a church.Courts are there to intrepid the law...
Are you saying the courts should have their own enforcement force?
No matter what we think of the laws, there are ways to change them... Courts intrepid the laws on the books today...
Meh, do something about it you gutless traitors. Meanwhile an ILLEGAL deported multiple times with an arrest record as long as your arm gets blind drunk, drives 100mph with no license or insurance and KILLS a teen couple. Yeah, Dems are letting this filth out of prison early after only 3 years. Thank God Trump stepped in to stop this injustice!!Judge scorches Trump admin for stonewalling in Abrego Garcia deportation case
You make it sound as if you think the public doesn't broadly support the Constitution. It's safe to say trumples don't. After all, trump violated it when he tried to steal the 2020 election but they voted for him anyway in 2024.I'm saying that courts should not enter orders that don't have broad support already.
He's not a citizen of Maryland. I just think you unfairly characterized Robert W's post.The court decide that, not the Executive branch.... They can bring him to court but he gets due process....
People are stop coming to US on even Holidays because lack of protections they have in US... US Citizens are treated far far better in EU...
![]()
As international tourists pull back on U.S. travel and purchases, $90 billion in lost revenue looms
Visits from Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom have seen particularly significant declines.www.nbcnews.com
All you have to do is respect people's rights...
progs don't like borders. How about we all just try to follow the law.You make it sound as if you think the public doesn't broadly support the Constitution. It's safe to say trumples don't. After all, trump violated it when he tried to steal the 2020 election but they voted for him anyway in 2024.
There's this thing called "Separation of Powers" in The United States government, brah.It's a constitutional crisis any time the executive branch refuses to comply with a court order that has not been stayed or overturned.
Executive orders are treated as laws. And actually the Judicial Branch does enforce the law.No, the Judicial branch doesn't enforce the law. Try again, silly dembot.
Go back to basic Civics.
Not sure what that has to do with my post.Executive orders are treated as laws.
My side? You must be referring to the lower court making the original ruling against the regime, the appeals court agreeing with it, a district court agreeing with it, and the SC agreeing with it.The problem for your side @berg80 is that 1) there is not a clear and actionable act of contempt (yet)
Look it up, ShitSperg. :/Ridiculous. You folks really do need to find some media sources that aren't lying to you 24/7.
Yes, the judicial side.My side? You must be referring to the lower court making the original ruling against the regime, the appeals court agreeing with it, a district court agreeing with it, and the SC agreeing with it.
"Elections have consequences" - B ObamaNormally that is when Congress, with its impeachment power, would step in. But the House Repubs have shown they are prepared to subvert the Constitution to Dear Leader.