Something has got to be done about the police.

Why don't you go to your local LEO and take a look?
Many police departments will advise the public on recruit qualifications and training curriculum, etc.

You appear to be like many (about 9+ out of 10) who complain about the police, yet are unable to qualify, pass the training that does exist, or be able to do a better job than those you complain about.

Since the qualifications and training vary a bit around the USA, you might want to pick one of the least demanding departments.
LOL! I guess you haven't really looked at some of the police in this country.
 
If it did, we would have had nationalized police force for a very long time, but we don't.
Since the FEDERAL constitutrion is the basis of all law in this country, those who are empowered to enforce the law, should have national standards of conduct.
 
Last edited:
LibStain logic: look over here, 0.001% issue while 85% of violent crimes are committed by Blacks Browns, mixed, other, decline to state or unsure what gender they are? WTH? Unprovoked violence in far too many cases.
 
Last edited:
Because you feel bad behavior should be ignored
Except in even rarer circumstances than a criminal meets the law, law abiding citizens have nothing to fear. You sound like an underworld with Lots to fear.?

Thats incoherent.

Related to that is among those who complain most about the police/LEO; in 9+ out of ten they wouldn't pass the qualifications and background checks to be hired, wouldn't qualify to pass the training, and even if they made through all that, they would be worse at the job than the ones they complain about.

Thats bullshit.

one in 10 billion. Buy a lottery ticket or a polygraph machine.

Bullshit.

Stuff happens. 50-50 chance in the hood. 1 in 1 billion in a Police shooting “in the back”.. nice try.

You're lying. Again.

Alleged internet story. Were you there? Watching? Did nothing? SHUP with your BS.

You subhuman shit. Are you actually claiming that my wife made up the fact that a Florida state trooper raped her at age twelve?
 
It's just getting ridiculous. There has to be national standards created for policing. That's all there is to it.

Police pressured him to confess to a murder that never happened. Now, Fontana will pay him $900,000​

The city of Fontana has agreed to pay nearly $900,000 to settle a federal lawsuit filed by a man who said police pressured him to falsely confess to a murder that never happened.

During a 17-hour interrogation in August 2018, Fontana Police Department officers questioned Thomas Perez Jr. about the disappearance of his father, whom Perez had reported missing. Officers alleged Perez had murdered his father and, when Perez denied the accusation, officers tried to convince him that he had forgotten the crime, according to a federal lawsuit, court records and video of the interrogation.

Throughout their lengthy questioning of Perez, officers used a variety of tactics aimed at goading him into confessing. They brought his dog into the interrogation room, told him the dog had walked through blood and would be sent away to be euthanized. They drove Perez to a dirt lot and asked him to walk around in search of his dad’s body. They told him that his father’s body was in a morgue.

“You murdered your dad,” one of the officers said, according to video of the interrogation. “Daddy’s dead because of you.”

At the 16-hour mark, Perez told police that he had gotten into an altercation with his father and had stabbed him.

But a major problem with that confession soon emerged: Perez’s father was alive and safe.

Part of the problem is dem policies and the defund the police movements. They have caused numerous officers to quit, retire early, and it has also effected recruiting. The severe shortages of officers has led to them being forced to hire just about anyone off the streets. Most of the problem is your very own fault.
 
No they do not.
Our police receive better training than in most other parts of the world.
The other poster provided a link showing that our police officers are required to go through much less training than in many other parts of the world.

If you’re trying to argue that ours receive better training in less time, then the burden is on you to prove it.
 
The other poster provided a link showing that our police officers are required to go through much less training than in many other parts of the world.

If you’re trying to argue that ours receive better training in less time, then the burden is on you to prove it.
Instead of numerous posts of vague and non-specific content, the burden is first upon you to provide clear and precise information as to what "other poster" you are referring to and the post number within this thread.

Second you need to establish the metrics by which you think quantity is more important than quality when it comes to training.

Third establish how the training in other countries would equal that needed to be an LEO in this country. Laws and cultures, etc. do vary. The USA has conditions that make being a police officer more challenging here than in many other parts of the world.

Fourth, give us a clue you have even a vague grasp of what the real training is and/or where and what specifically you think needs to be included rather than vague generalizations that may not be accurate.

The burden of proof that LEO in the USA are not trained "enough" remains with you and the other criminal wannabes who want police trained to less effective standards.

FWIW, you and the many other social misfits bemoaning police training systems and standards in the USA can't even make clear what sort of training is done and what specifically needs to be done.

In short, you all are ignorant idiot crybabies who the police to be less effective in preventing you from pursuing you criminal intents and activities.
 
I am a lot more likely to be mugged, robbed at gunpoint, or murdered than I am to be punished for a crime I did not commit. This is true for most Americans. We benefit from a vigorous police force that shares my hatred for criminals.

The police are more effective in catching the bad guys when they are given the benefit of the doubt.
 
Last edited:
In this example we have a police force that tortured a man to try and elicit a confession to a crime that never happened. They lied to try and paint a portrait of a crime that never happened. They denied him his needed medication to try and get him to confess to a crime that never happened.

I imagine 5 minutes knocking on a few neighbors doors and they would have discovered a door bell camera showing the man walking away.

No instead they decided to torture a man for a crime that never happened.

Yes he got a settlement (after many years) but was any of the officers held accountable for what they did? I've seen no evidence that shows they have. None of them should still be police officers. They themselves should have been charged with a crime. But they were not. The system covered for them. Some say it's only a few but again, the entire system covered for them.
 
Yes, they need to be given more leeway to crack some heads when dealing with entitled losers like yourself.
Backwards into the future, eh?

581c17e8190000a502c30db6.jpeg
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2

Forum List

Back
Top