Someone went through a lot of trouble to orchestrate these demonstrations

[AntonToo]

To bad this kind of organization, effort, support never was used to actually get anything good done here or around the world. Where was this effort to stop radicalized propaganda, the same kind of propaganda used to create these demonstrations?
Where was this effort to stop terrorism, the same kind of terrorism used to threaten celebrities, politicians, and instigate these destablizing events while causing riots yesterday?

Where was this effort to stop poisoning our kids with drugs, I thought woman cared for their children's health and welfare and security?
Where was this effort to end violence in Chicago?
Where was this effort to support our servicemen and our protective police?

Where was this effort to get Hillary to pay for her revealed crimes, or to support
investigating the many whistleblowers who mysteriously died?

Where was the effort to protest the UN, the effort to protest the Iran deal, the protest to investigate what favors were offered the many countries for the money the Clinton's received?
Where's the support for charities exploited for Clinton gains, or woman, hispanic and black communities that were manipulated played like 8n these protests?

Wherecs the protest in front of the FCC regarding abuse of broadcasting propaganda?
Protest against the coupe and acts of treason?
Protest against Google and others abusing rights to privacy and those scary app permissions on your phone that even permits them to track your speed and know your calendar plans, places you are at and can allow the Clintons of this world to Abuse you in any way shape or form like they did using the IRS against their opponents? Where's your effort to stop that kind of total violation?

Where is Your effort regarding most all the brokers, phone companies, retailers, and even IRS, where your personal info was stolen, not a peep from these organizers why?

Where is your time and energy giving your extra blankets to the frozen homeless up there at your marches?
How about Michael Moore put aside 1/3 his daily calorie intake to feed a village?
His comments contradict earlier interviews therefore his recent protest is to garnish popularity and support for his future projects and films.=money to him.
Where was he protesting letting Hillary off the hook or the other politicians so scared the gig is up that they are more likely the orchestrators that so love to hate. Shuman you aren't fooling
anyone.
YOUR MOBSTER TACTICS ARE BEING THREATENED and that scares you people into further deeper corruption, destablizing our govt for sake of your clear cut coupe.
If you hate democracy, & law and order then go to those countries you claimed to flee to...oh that's right they have imigration laws.. Go FIGURE!

Well Soros paid fifty groups 90 million dollars.

You could say he organized the whole shebang.

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

Well for nothing it sure funded that world wide protest.

You are clearly fucking stupid. No other way to explain your pathetic take on what happened. Your mind refuses to accept the obvious - A LOT OF PEOPLE REALLY DON'T LIKE TRUMP.

 

[Claudette]

To bad this kind of organization, effort, support never was used to actually get anything good done here or around the world. Where was this effort to stop radicalized propaganda, the same kind of propaganda used to create these demonstrations?
Where was this effort to stop terrorism, the same kind of terrorism used to threaten celebrities, politicians, and instigate these destablizing events while causing riots yesterday?

Where was this effort to stop poisoning our kids with drugs, I thought woman cared for their children's health and welfare and security?
Where was this effort to end violence in Chicago?
Where was this effort to support our servicemen and our protective police?

Where was this effort to get Hillary to pay for her revealed crimes, or to support
investigating the many whistleblowers who mysteriously died?

Where was the effort to protest the UN, the effort to protest the Iran deal, the protest to investigate what favors were offered the many countries for the money the Clinton's received?
Where's the support for charities exploited for Clinton gains, or woman, hispanic and black communities that were manipulated played like 8n these protests?

Wherecs the protest in front of the FCC regarding abuse of broadcasting propaganda?
Protest against the coupe and acts of treason?
Protest against Google and others abusing rights to privacy and those scary app permissions on your phone that even permits them to track your speed and know your calendar plans, places you are at and can allow the Clintons of this world to Abuse you in any way shape or form like they did using the IRS against their opponents? Where's your effort to stop that kind of total violation?

Where is Your effort regarding most all the brokers, phone companies, retailers, and even IRS, where your personal info was stolen, not a peep from these organizers why?

Where is your time and energy giving your extra blankets to the frozen homeless up there at your marches?
How about Michael Moore put aside 1/3 his daily calorie intake to feed a village?
His comments contradict earlier interviews therefore his recent protest is to garnish popularity and support for his future projects and films.=money to him.
Where was he protesting letting Hillary off the hook or the other politicians so scared the gig is up that they are more likely the orchestrators that so love to hate. Shuman you aren't fooling
anyone.
YOUR MOBSTER TACTICS ARE BEING THREATENED and that scares you people into further deeper corruption, destablizing our govt for sake of your clear cut coupe.
If you hate democracy, & law and order then go to those countries you claimed to flee to...oh that's right they have imigration laws.. Go FIGURE!

Well Soros paid fifty groups 90 million dollars.

You could say he organized the whole shebang.

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

Well for nothing it sure funded that world wide protest.

You are clearly fucking stupid. No other way to explain your pathetic take on what happened. Your mind refuses to accept the obvious - A LOT OF PEOPLE REALLY DON'T LIKE TRUMP.

Speaking of tree stump dumb. That's you pal. A sore loser of a Hillary supporter. Soros spent 90 million on that little fiasco. Of course if it had been the Koch brothers you'd be singing a different tune.

Suck it up you POS. Hillary lost and Trump won. He will be POTUS for the next four to eight years.

Lots of people really don't like Hillary.

 

[HaShev]

To bad this kind of organization, effort, support never was used to actually get anything good done here or around the world. Where was this effort to stop radicalized propaganda, the same kind of propaganda used to create these demonstrations?
Where was this effort to stop terrorism, the same kind of terrorism used to threaten celebrities, politicians, and instigate these destablizing events while causing riots yesterday?

Where was this effort to stop poisoning our kids with drugs, I thought woman cared for their children's health and welfare and security?
Where was this effort to end violence in Chicago?
Where was this effort to support our servicemen and our protective police?

Where was this effort to get Hillary to pay for her revealed crimes, or to support
investigating the many whistleblowers who mysteriously died?

Where was the effort to protest the UN, the effort to protest the Iran deal, the protest to investigate what favors were offered the many countries for the money the Clinton's received?
Where's the support for charities exploited for Clinton gains, or woman, hispanic and black communities that were manipulated played like 8n these protests?

Wherecs the protest in front of the FCC regarding abuse of broadcasting propaganda?
Protest against the coupe and acts of treason?
Protest against Google and others abusing rights to privacy and those scary app permissions on your phone that even permits them to track your speed and know your calendar plans, places you are at and can allow the Clintons of this world to Abuse you in any way shape or form like they did using the IRS against their opponents? Where's your effort to stop that kind of total violation?

Where is Your effort regarding most all the brokers, phone companies, retailers, and even IRS, where your personal info was stolen, not a peep from these organizers why?

Where is your time and energy giving your extra blankets to the frozen homeless up there at your marches?
How about Michael Moore put aside 1/3 his daily calorie intake to feed a village?
His comments contradict earlier interviews therefore his recent protest is to garnish popularity and support for his future projects and films.=money to him.
Where was he protesting letting Hillary off the hook or the other politicians so scared the gig is up that they are more likely the orchestrators that so love to hate. Shuman you aren't fooling
anyone.
YOUR MOBSTER TACTICS ARE BEING THREATENED and that scares you people into further deeper corruption, destablizing our govt for sake of your clear cut coupe.
If you hate democracy, & law and order then go to those countries you claimed to flee to...oh that's right they have imigration laws.. Go FIGURE!

Well Soros paid fifty groups 90 million dollars.

You could say he organized the whole shebang.

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

You do realize there's a big difference between the normal campaign financing and abnormal Soros spending (if that's true)on helping terrorists by destabilizing our gov't and foreign entities trying to cause a coupe.

 

[keepitreal]

To bad this kind of organization, effort, support never was used to actually get anything good done here or around the world. Where was this effort to stop radicalized propaganda, the same kind of propaganda used to create these demonstrations?
Where was this effort to stop terrorism, the same kind of terrorism used to threaten celebrities, politicians, and instigate these destablizing events while causing riots yesterday?

Where was this effort to stop poisoning our kids with drugs, I thought woman cared for their children's health and welfare and security?
Where was this effort to end violence in Chicago?
Where was this effort to support our servicemen and our protective police?

Where was this effort to get Hillary to pay for her revealed crimes, or to support
investigating the many whistleblowers who mysteriously died?

Where was the effort to protest the UN, the effort to protest the Iran deal, the protest to investigate what favors were offered the many countries for the money the Clinton's received?
Where's the support for charities exploited for Clinton gains, or woman, hispanic and black communities that were manipulated played like 8n these protests?

Wherecs the protest in front of the FCC regarding abuse of broadcasting propaganda?
Protest against the coupe and acts of treason?
Protest against Google and others abusing rights to privacy and those scary app permissions on your phone that even permits them to track your speed and know your calendar plans, places you are at and can allow the Clintons of this world to Abuse you in any way shape or form like they did using the IRS against their opponents? Where's your effort to stop that kind of total violation?

Where is Your effort regarding most all the brokers, phone companies, retailers, and even IRS, where your personal info was stolen, not a peep from these organizers why?

Where is your time and energy giving your extra blankets to the frozen homeless up there at your marches?
How about Michael Moore put aside 1/3 his daily calorie intake to feed a village?
His comments contradict earlier interviews therefore his recent protest is to garnish popularity and support for his future projects and films.=money to him.
Where was he protesting letting Hillary off the hook or the other politicians so scared the gig is up that they are more likely the orchestrators that so love to hate. Shuman you aren't fooling
anyone.
YOUR MOBSTER TACTICS ARE BEING THREATENED and that scares you people into further deeper corruption, destablizing our govt for sake of your clear cut coupe.
If you hate democracy, & law and order then go to those countries you claimed to flee to...oh that's right they have imigration laws.. Go FIGURE!

 

[HaShev]

To bad this kind of organization, effort, support never was used to actually get anything good done here or around the world. Where was this effort to stop radicalized propaganda, the same kind of propaganda used to create these demonstrations?
Where was this effort to stop terrorism, the same kind of terrorism used to threaten celebrities, politicians, and instigate these destablizing events while causing riots yesterday?

Where was this effort to stop poisoning our kids with drugs, I thought woman cared for their children's health and welfare and security?
Where was this effort to end violence in Chicago?
Where was this effort to support our servicemen and our protective police?

Where was this effort to get Hillary to pay for her revealed crimes, or to support
investigating the many whistleblowers who mysteriously died?

Where was the effort to protest the UN, the effort to protest the Iran deal, the protest to investigate what favors were offered the many countries for the money the Clinton's received?
Where's the support for charities exploited for Clinton gains, or woman, hispanic and black communities that were manipulated played like 8n these protests?

Wherecs the protest in front of the FCC regarding abuse of broadcasting propaganda?
Protest against the coupe and acts of treason?
Protest against Google and others abusing rights to privacy and those scary app permissions on your phone that even permits them to track your speed and know your calendar plans, places you are at and can allow the Clintons of this world to Abuse you in any way shape or form like they did using the IRS against their opponents? Where's your effort to stop that kind of total violation?

Where is Your effort regarding most all the brokers, phone companies, retailers, and even IRS, where your personal info was stolen, not a peep from these organizers why?

Where is your time and energy giving your extra blankets to the frozen homeless up there at your marches?
How about Michael Moore put aside 1/3 his daily calorie intake to feed a village?
His comments contradict earlier interviews therefore his recent protest is to garnish popularity and support for his future projects and films.=money to him.
Where was he protesting letting Hillary off the hook or the other politicians so scared the gig is up that they are more likely the orchestrators that so love to hate. Shuman you aren't fooling
anyone.
YOUR MOBSTER TACTICS ARE BEING THREATENED and that scares you people into further deeper corruption, destablizing our govt for sake of your clear cut coupe.
If you hate democracy, & law and order then go to those countries you claimed to flee to...oh that's right they have imigration laws.. Go FIGURE!

Well Soros paid fifty groups 90 million dollars.

You could say he organized the whole shebang.

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

Well for nothing it sure funded that world wide protest.

You are clearly fucking stupid. No other way to explain your pathetic take on what happened. Your mind refuses to accept the obvious - A LOT OF PEOPLE REALLY DON'T LIKE TRUMP.

And a lot of people don't like green eggs and ham, but you don't see people protesting it or beating up children with Dr Seuss books.
Take your anger and hostility to the Play Doh room little child.

 

[Andylusion]

To bad this kind of organization, effort, support never was used to actually get anything good done here or around the world. Where was this effort to stop radicalized propaganda, the same kind of propaganda used to create these demonstrations?
Where was this effort to stop terrorism, the same kind of terrorism used to threaten celebrities, politicians, and instigate these destablizing events while causing riots yesterday?

Where was this effort to stop poisoning our kids with drugs, I thought woman cared for their children's health and welfare and security?
Where was this effort to end violence in Chicago?
Where was this effort to support our servicemen and our protective police?

Where was this effort to get Hillary to pay for her revealed crimes, or to support
investigating the many whistleblowers who mysteriously died?

Where was the effort to protest the UN, the effort to protest the Iran deal, the protest to investigate what favors were offered the many countries for the money the Clinton's received?
Where's the support for charities exploited for Clinton gains, or woman, hispanic and black communities that were manipulated played like 8n these protests?

Wherecs the protest in front of the FCC regarding abuse of broadcasting propaganda?
Protest against the coupe and acts of treason?
Protest against Google and others abusing rights to privacy and those scary app permissions on your phone that even permits them to track your speed and know your calendar plans, places you are at and can allow the Clintons of this world to Abuse you in any way shape or form like they did using the IRS against their opponents? Where's your effort to stop that kind of total violation?

Where is Your effort regarding most all the brokers, phone companies, retailers, and even IRS, where your personal info was stolen, not a peep from these organizers why?

Where is your time and energy giving your extra blankets to the frozen homeless up there at your marches?
How about Michael Moore put aside 1/3 his daily calorie intake to feed a village?
His comments contradict earlier interviews therefore his recent protest is to garnish popularity and support for his future projects and films.=money to him.
Where was he protesting letting Hillary off the hook or the other politicians so scared the gig is up that they are more likely the orchestrators that so love to hate. Shuman you aren't fooling
anyone.
YOUR MOBSTER TACTICS ARE BEING THREATENED and that scares you people into further deeper corruption, destablizing our govt for sake of your clear cut coupe.
If you hate democracy, & law and order then go to those countries you claimed to flee to...oh that's right they have imigration laws.. Go FIGURE!

Well Soros paid fifty groups 90 million dollars.

You could say he organized the whole shebang.

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

Not true. Simply not true. The left-wing has been in the pockets of big business for decades. Virtually everything the left-wing pushes, is a benefit to big business.

The recent net neutrality laws, are a perfect example. The main proponents of net neutrality were all multi-billionaires. And look who has benefited from the laws?

All the big internet providers are merging, and consumer choice is dropping. And the big mega corps are profiting, just as all of us on the right-wing predicted. I said this would happen years ago. It happened exactly, to the letter, as I said it would.

So between the two of us, which of us is a pawn of big corporations? Not me. I would have reduced regulations to increase competition. The left-wing, which you represent here in this thread, increase regulation, which killed competition, and made the mega-corps and multi-billionaires super wealthy.

So no, using facts instead of opinion, the left-wing is nothing more than a play-toy for the rich and wealthy. Go read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. That book is virtually a documentary of you left-wingers today.

 

[AntonToo]

To bad this kind of organization, effort, support never was used to actually get anything good done here or around the world. Where was this effort to stop radicalized propaganda, the same kind of propaganda used to create these demonstrations?
Where was this effort to stop terrorism, the same kind of terrorism used to threaten celebrities, politicians, and instigate these destablizing events while causing riots yesterday?

Where was this effort to stop poisoning our kids with drugs, I thought woman cared for their children's health and welfare and security?
Where was this effort to end violence in Chicago?
Where was this effort to support our servicemen and our protective police?

Where was this effort to get Hillary to pay for her revealed crimes, or to support
investigating the many whistleblowers who mysteriously died?

Where was the effort to protest the UN, the effort to protest the Iran deal, the protest to investigate what favors were offered the many countries for the money the Clinton's received?
Where's the support for charities exploited for Clinton gains, or woman, hispanic and black communities that were manipulated played like 8n these protests?

Wherecs the protest in front of the FCC regarding abuse of broadcasting propaganda?
Protest against the coupe and acts of treason?
Protest against Google and others abusing rights to privacy and those scary app permissions on your phone that even permits them to track your speed and know your calendar plans, places you are at and can allow the Clintons of this world to Abuse you in any way shape or form like they did using the IRS against their opponents? Where's your effort to stop that kind of total violation?

Where is Your effort regarding most all the brokers, phone companies, retailers, and even IRS, where your personal info was stolen, not a peep from these organizers why?

Where is your time and energy giving your extra blankets to the frozen homeless up there at your marches?
How about Michael Moore put aside 1/3 his daily calorie intake to feed a village?
His comments contradict earlier interviews therefore his recent protest is to garnish popularity and support for his future projects and films.=money to him.
Where was he protesting letting Hillary off the hook or the other politicians so scared the gig is up that they are more likely the orchestrators that so love to hate. Shuman you aren't fooling
anyone.
YOUR MOBSTER TACTICS ARE BEING THREATENED and that scares you people into further deeper corruption, destablizing our govt for sake of your clear cut coupe.
If you hate democracy, & law and order then go to those countries you claimed to flee to...oh that's right they have imigration laws.. Go FIGURE!

Well Soros paid fifty groups 90 million dollars.

You could say he organized the whole shebang.

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

Not true. Simply not true. The left-wing has been in the pockets of big business for decades. Virtually everything the left-wing pushes, is a benefit to big business.

That is an INSANE comment.

Left wing pushes higher taxes on the rich and corporations to spend on government programs and entitlements - how the hell does that help big business?
Left wing also pushes government oversight and regulations like anti-trust, environmental protection and higher minimum wages.

The right pushes in exactly OPPOSITE direction, which is far more 1%ter and big-business friendly.

There are certainly some big spenders on the left, but they do so DIRECTLY OPPOSITE to their personal self interests.

For example: The Patriotic Millionaires - these are people who's cause is to make millionares like themselves pay more taxes to support this country.

Self-interest is sawed into right wing ideology itself, where left wing politics usually revolve about responsibility to the society at large.

 

[Andylusion]

To bad this kind of organization, effort, support never was used to actually get anything good done here or around the world. Where was this effort to stop radicalized propaganda, the same kind of propaganda used to create these demonstrations?
Where was this effort to stop terrorism, the same kind of terrorism used to threaten celebrities, politicians, and instigate these destablizing events while causing riots yesterday?

Where was this effort to stop poisoning our kids with drugs, I thought woman cared for their children's health and welfare and security?
Where was this effort to end violence in Chicago?
Where was this effort to support our servicemen and our protective police?

Where was this effort to get Hillary to pay for her revealed crimes, or to support
investigating the many whistleblowers who mysteriously died?

Where was the effort to protest the UN, the effort to protest the Iran deal, the protest to investigate what favors were offered the many countries for the money the Clinton's received?
Where's the support for charities exploited for Clinton gains, or woman, hispanic and black communities that were manipulated played like 8n these protests?

Wherecs the protest in front of the FCC regarding abuse of broadcasting propaganda?
Protest against the coupe and acts of treason?
Protest against Google and others abusing rights to privacy and those scary app permissions on your phone that even permits them to track your speed and know your calendar plans, places you are at and can allow the Clintons of this world to Abuse you in any way shape or form like they did using the IRS against their opponents? Where's your effort to stop that kind of total violation?

Where is Your effort regarding most all the brokers, phone companies, retailers, and even IRS, where your personal info was stolen, not a peep from these organizers why?

Where is your time and energy giving your extra blankets to the frozen homeless up there at your marches?
How about Michael Moore put aside 1/3 his daily calorie intake to feed a village?
His comments contradict earlier interviews therefore his recent protest is to garnish popularity and support for his future projects and films.=money to him.
Where was he protesting letting Hillary off the hook or the other politicians so scared the gig is up that they are more likely the orchestrators that so love to hate. Shuman you aren't fooling
anyone.
YOUR MOBSTER TACTICS ARE BEING THREATENED and that scares you people into further deeper corruption, destablizing our govt for sake of your clear cut coupe.
If you hate democracy, & law and order then go to those countries you claimed to flee to...oh that's right they have imigration laws.. Go FIGURE!

Well Soros paid fifty groups 90 million dollars.

You could say he organized the whole shebang.

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

Not true. Simply not true. The left-wing has been in the pockets of big business for decades. Virtually everything the left-wing pushes, is a benefit to big business.

That is an INSANE comment.

Left wing pushes higher taxes on the rich and corporations to spend on government programs and entitlements - how the hell does that help big business?
Left wing also pushes government oversight and regulations like anti-trust, environmental protection and higher minimum wages.

The right pushes in exactly OPPOSITE direction, which is far more 1%ter and big-business friendly.

There are certainly some big spenders on the left, but they do so DIRECTLY OPPOSITE to their personal self interests.

For example: The Patriotic Millionaires - these are people who's cause is to make millionares like themselves pay more taxes to support this country.

Self-interest is sawed into right wing ideology itself, where left wing politics usually revolve about responsibility to the society at large.

Allow me to explain.

Take Warren Buffet. Warren Buffet is a staunch democrat that has supported raising taxes on the rich, which you claimed was 'directly opposite to their personal self interests'.

Right?

Let me ask you a question. If we doubled the top marginal tax rate, to 80% or higher, how much more would Buffet pay in taxes? Do you know what Warren Buffets salary is?

$100,000 a year. Top marginal tax rate is income over $415K. So Warren Buffet would pay $0 more in tax.

So... when Warren Buffet, and thousands of other billionaire left-wing liberals demand higher taxes on the rich... it doesn't affect them. Who does it affect? The people who are trying to get rich. Not the people who are rich.

See? Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

Another example. Warren Buffet invested millions on millions into buying BNSF railroad in 2007. Go look at some of the biggest expenditures of the 2009 'stimulus' package? Money to the railroad Unions, and money for infrastructure projects, most of which was for railroad infrastructure. I know of at least two specific examples of the stimulus money being used in projects that directly and specifically benefited BNSF.

And who pays for those infrastructure projects? Well of course we do. The public. Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

None of these anti-poor, pro-rich views are right-wing. These are all left wing.

Take the minimum wage. A lot of left-wingers were shocked when McDonald's CEO came out in favor of a higher minimum wage, and the $15/hour minimum wage in SF was promoted.

But the moment you hear billionaire executives supporting minimum wage, you should automatically wonder why.

McDonald's is a multi-billion dollar international company. Which companies are going to be able to afford a higher minimum wage? The small indenpendent chaines, or the large mega-corps? Obviously the mega-corps. The small chain stores will go out of business.

Meaning... more customers for McDonald's. But doesn't that mean McDonald's will have to pay more money to employee?

See those high paid employees? Nope? Neither do I.

See McDonald's has the money to invest in replacements for employees. McDonald's also knows that poorer, smaller companies do not. So McDonald's knows that the smaller companies will go out of business, while they replace expensive $15/hour workers, with cheap kiosks and automation.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. All those former employees, have to find something else to do... if they can even find a job.

See? The left-wing is the biggest supporters of big business. Not the right-wing.

Another example, you mentioned all that regulation and 'anti-trust'.

But in reality, regulation and anti-trust, is the biggest creators of monopolies.

See, regulation by its very nature, is costly. A rough estimate is that Federal regulations alone, cost over $2 Trillion a year. Now where does that money come from? YOU. You pay the price, in higher costs to consumers. And that's just Federal. There are state and local regulations that cost companies billions every year as well.

More specifically though, which company is more able to pay that price? A big mega-corp? Or a startup? Of course the mega-corp has billions of dollars to meet all those regulations. The smaller companies do not.

So the smaller companies, merge or sell out, or close.... leaving the mega-corps to have customers with fewer options to choose from.

Take net neutrality. Government heaped hundreds of pages of regulations on the broadband internet providers. What do we see today? Altice bought Cablevision. Charter and Time Warner. Verizon Fios was sold to Frontier.

I predicted this, when Net Neutrality was debated. You heap a bunch of regulations, and smaller providers merge with larger providers, resulting in higher prices, and less consumer choice.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. Again, this is not a right-wing policy that is causing this. It's a left-wing policy. You help the rich get richer, and poor get poorer. Not us.

The difference between us, is that the right-wing looks at results, not the stated goals. Your goal doesn't matter. What matters is the results of your actions. The results are, poor people are harmed, and rich people benefit.

 

[AntonToo]

To bad this kind of organization, effort, support never was used to actually get anything good done here or around the world. Where was this effort to stop radicalized propaganda, the same kind of propaganda used to create these demonstrations?
Where was this effort to stop terrorism, the same kind of terrorism used to threaten celebrities, politicians, and instigate these destablizing events while causing riots yesterday?

Where was this effort to stop poisoning our kids with drugs, I thought woman cared for their children's health and welfare and security?
Where was this effort to end violence in Chicago?
Where was this effort to support our servicemen and our protective police?

Where was this effort to get Hillary to pay for her revealed crimes, or to support
investigating the many whistleblowers who mysteriously died?

Where was the effort to protest the UN, the effort to protest the Iran deal, the protest to investigate what favors were offered the many countries for the money the Clinton's received?
Where's the support for charities exploited for Clinton gains, or woman, hispanic and black communities that were manipulated played like 8n these protests?

Wherecs the protest in front of the FCC regarding abuse of broadcasting propaganda?
Protest against the coupe and acts of treason?
Protest against Google and others abusing rights to privacy and those scary app permissions on your phone that even permits them to track your speed and know your calendar plans, places you are at and can allow the Clintons of this world to Abuse you in any way shape or form like they did using the IRS against their opponents? Where's your effort to stop that kind of total violation?

Where is Your effort regarding most all the brokers, phone companies, retailers, and even IRS, where your personal info was stolen, not a peep from these organizers why?

Where is your time and energy giving your extra blankets to the frozen homeless up there at your marches?
How about Michael Moore put aside 1/3 his daily calorie intake to feed a village?
His comments contradict earlier interviews therefore his recent protest is to garnish popularity and support for his future projects and films.=money to him.
Where was he protesting letting Hillary off the hook or the other politicians so scared the gig is up that they are more likely the orchestrators that so love to hate. Shuman you aren't fooling
anyone.
YOUR MOBSTER TACTICS ARE BEING THREATENED and that scares you people into further deeper corruption, destablizing our govt for sake of your clear cut coupe.
If you hate democracy, & law and order then go to those countries you claimed to flee to...oh that's right they have imigration laws.. Go FIGURE!

Well Soros paid fifty groups 90 million dollars.

You could say he organized the whole shebang.

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

Not true. Simply not true. The left-wing has been in the pockets of big business for decades. Virtually everything the left-wing pushes, is a benefit to big business.

That is an INSANE comment.

Left wing pushes higher taxes on the rich and corporations to spend on government programs and entitlements - how the hell does that help big business?
Left wing also pushes government oversight and regulations like anti-trust, environmental protection and higher minimum wages.

The right pushes in exactly OPPOSITE direction, which is far more 1%ter and big-business friendly.

There are certainly some big spenders on the left, but they do so DIRECTLY OPPOSITE to their personal self interests.

For example: The Patriotic Millionaires - these are people who's cause is to make millionares like themselves pay more taxes to support this country.

Self-interest is sawed into right wing ideology itself, where left wing politics usually revolve about responsibility to the society at large.

Allow me to explain.

Take Warren Buffet. Warren Buffet is a staunch democrat that has supported raising taxes on the rich, which you claimed was 'directly opposite to their personal self interests'.

Right?

Let me ask you a question. If we doubled the top marginal tax rate, to 80% or higher, how much more would Buffet pay in taxes? Do you know what Warren Buffets salary is?

$100,000 a year. Top marginal tax rate is income over $415K. So Warren Buffet would pay $0 more in tax.

So... when Warren Buffet, and thousands of other billionaire left-wing liberals demand higher taxes on the rich... it doesn't affect them. Who does it affect? The people who are trying to get rich. Not the people who are rich.

See? Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

Another example. Warren Buffet invested millions on millions into buying BNSF railroad in 2007. Go look at some of the biggest expenditures of the 2009 'stimulus' package? Money to the railroad Unions, and money for infrastructure projects, most of which was for railroad infrastructure. I know of at least two specific examples of the stimulus money being used in projects that directly and specifically benefited BNSF.

And who pays for those infrastructure projects? Well of course we do. The public. Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

None of these anti-poor, pro-rich views are right-wing. These are all left wing.

Take the minimum wage. A lot of left-wingers were shocked when McDonald's CEO came out in favor of a higher minimum wage, and the $15/hour minimum wage in SF was promoted.

But the moment you hear billionaire executives supporting minimum wage, you should automatically wonder why.

McDonald's is a multi-billion dollar international company. Which companies are going to be able to afford a higher minimum wage? The small indenpendent chaines, or the large mega-corps? Obviously the mega-corps. The small chain stores will go out of business.

Meaning... more customers for McDonald's. But doesn't that mean McDonald's will have to pay more money to employee?

View attachment 109455
See those high paid employees? Nope? Neither do I.

See McDonald's has the money to invest in replacements for employees. McDonald's also knows that poorer, smaller companies do not. So McDonald's knows that the smaller companies will go out of business, while they replace expensive $15/hour workers, with cheap kiosks and automation.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. All those former employees, have to find something else to do... if they can even find a job.

See? The left-wing is the biggest supporters of big business. Not the right-wing.

Another example, you mentioned all that regulation and 'anti-trust'.

But in reality, regulation and anti-trust, is the biggest creators of monopolies.

See, regulation by its very nature, is costly. A rough estimate is that Federal regulations alone, cost over $2 Trillion a year. Now where does that money come from? YOU. You pay the price, in higher costs to consumers. And that's just Federal. There are state and local regulations that cost companies billions every year as well.

More specifically though, which company is more able to pay that price? A big mega-corp? Or a startup? Of course the mega-corp has billions of dollars to meet all those regulations. The smaller companies do not.

So the smaller companies, merge or sell out, or close.... leaving the mega-corps to have customers with fewer options to choose from.

Take net neutrality. Government heaped hundreds of pages of regulations on the broadband internet providers. What do we see today? Altice bought Cablevision. Charter and Time Warner. Verizon Fios was sold to Frontier.

I predicted this, when Net Neutrality was debated. You heap a bunch of regulations, and smaller providers merge with larger providers, resulting in higher prices, and less consumer choice.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. Again, this is not a right-wing policy that is causing this. It's a left-wing policy. You help the rich get richer, and poor get poorer. Not us.

The difference between us, is that the right-wing looks at results, not the stated goals. Your goal doesn't matter. What matters is the results of your actions. The results are, poor people are harmed, and rich people benefit.

You are totally clueless, Buffet rule would tax all income, including capital gains he makes his billions from at a minimum rate.

Buffet will not be spared from Buffet rule.

 

[Andylusion]

Well Soros paid fifty groups 90 million dollars.

You could say he organized the whole shebang.

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

Not true. Simply not true. The left-wing has been in the pockets of big business for decades. Virtually everything the left-wing pushes, is a benefit to big business.

That is an INSANE comment.

Left wing pushes higher taxes on the rich and corporations to spend on government programs and entitlements - how the hell does that help big business?
Left wing also pushes government oversight and regulations like anti-trust, environmental protection and higher minimum wages.

The right pushes in exactly OPPOSITE direction, which is far more 1%ter and big-business friendly.

There are certainly some big spenders on the left, but they do so DIRECTLY OPPOSITE to their personal self interests.

For example: The Patriotic Millionaires - these are people who's cause is to make millionares like themselves pay more taxes to support this country.

Self-interest is sawed into right wing ideology itself, where left wing politics usually revolve about responsibility to the society at large.

Allow me to explain.

Take Warren Buffet. Warren Buffet is a staunch democrat that has supported raising taxes on the rich, which you claimed was 'directly opposite to their personal self interests'.

Right?

Let me ask you a question. If we doubled the top marginal tax rate, to 80% or higher, how much more would Buffet pay in taxes? Do you know what Warren Buffets salary is?

$100,000 a year. Top marginal tax rate is income over $415K. So Warren Buffet would pay $0 more in tax.

So... when Warren Buffet, and thousands of other billionaire left-wing liberals demand higher taxes on the rich... it doesn't affect them. Who does it affect? The people who are trying to get rich. Not the people who are rich.

See? Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

Another example. Warren Buffet invested millions on millions into buying BNSF railroad in 2007. Go look at some of the biggest expenditures of the 2009 'stimulus' package? Money to the railroad Unions, and money for infrastructure projects, most of which was for railroad infrastructure. I know of at least two specific examples of the stimulus money being used in projects that directly and specifically benefited BNSF.

And who pays for those infrastructure projects? Well of course we do. The public. Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

None of these anti-poor, pro-rich views are right-wing. These are all left wing.

Take the minimum wage. A lot of left-wingers were shocked when McDonald's CEO came out in favor of a higher minimum wage, and the $15/hour minimum wage in SF was promoted.

But the moment you hear billionaire executives supporting minimum wage, you should automatically wonder why.

McDonald's is a multi-billion dollar international company. Which companies are going to be able to afford a higher minimum wage? The small indenpendent chaines, or the large mega-corps? Obviously the mega-corps. The small chain stores will go out of business.

Meaning... more customers for McDonald's. But doesn't that mean McDonald's will have to pay more money to employee?

View attachment 109455
See those high paid employees? Nope? Neither do I.

See McDonald's has the money to invest in replacements for employees. McDonald's also knows that poorer, smaller companies do not. So McDonald's knows that the smaller companies will go out of business, while they replace expensive $15/hour workers, with cheap kiosks and automation.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. All those former employees, have to find something else to do... if they can even find a job.

See? The left-wing is the biggest supporters of big business. Not the right-wing.

Another example, you mentioned all that regulation and 'anti-trust'.

But in reality, regulation and anti-trust, is the biggest creators of monopolies.

See, regulation by its very nature, is costly. A rough estimate is that Federal regulations alone, cost over $2 Trillion a year. Now where does that money come from? YOU. You pay the price, in higher costs to consumers. And that's just Federal. There are state and local regulations that cost companies billions every year as well.

More specifically though, which company is more able to pay that price? A big mega-corp? Or a startup? Of course the mega-corp has billions of dollars to meet all those regulations. The smaller companies do not.

So the smaller companies, merge or sell out, or close.... leaving the mega-corps to have customers with fewer options to choose from.

Take net neutrality. Government heaped hundreds of pages of regulations on the broadband internet providers. What do we see today? Altice bought Cablevision. Charter and Time Warner. Verizon Fios was sold to Frontier.

I predicted this, when Net Neutrality was debated. You heap a bunch of regulations, and smaller providers merge with larger providers, resulting in higher prices, and less consumer choice.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. Again, this is not a right-wing policy that is causing this. It's a left-wing policy. You help the rich get richer, and poor get poorer. Not us.

The difference between us, is that the right-wing looks at results, not the stated goals. Your goal doesn't matter. What matters is the results of your actions. The results are, poor people are harmed, and rich people benefit.

You are totally clueless, Buffet rule would tax all income, including capital gains he makes his billions from at a minimum rate.

Buffet will not be spared from Buffet rule.

Warren E Buffett, CEO Compensation - Forbes.com

Notice "Total Compensation" What does it say? $0.1 Million.
"5-Year Total Compensation" What does it say? $0.5 Million.

Where do you see "stock gains" "bonus" or "other"? -- (that means zero).

Which means.... zero. See, Buffet is brilliant, in that Berkshire Hathaway doesn't pay dividends at all, which of course would be taxed, at 23%. The Buffet rule would only raise those taxes to 30% anyway.

But it doesn't matter because Buffet doesn't pay ANY dividend taxes at all.

See.... Buffet doesn't need to own the stock in the dozens of companies he's invested into, because he owns Berkshire Hathaway, and Berkshire owns the stock in all those companies.

Any dividends paid by say BNSF, ends up at Berkshire Hathaway. Warren Buffet never sees them. Thus he never pays taxes on them.

So you could raise dividend taxes to 100% if you wanted. You still wouldn't get so much as penny more in taxes, from Warren Buffet.

Again... Taxes only prevent new people from getting wealthy. Not existing wealthy people.

Taxes are ultimately the best pro-wealthy, anti-poor policy you left-wingers ever promote.

 

[AntonToo]

90 million? Pfft that's NOTHING, Koch brothers planned to spend 900 million on 2016 elections:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0

There is actually a lot more big-politico-spending rightwingers then on the left.

Not true. Simply not true. The left-wing has been in the pockets of big business for decades. Virtually everything the left-wing pushes, is a benefit to big business.

That is an INSANE comment.

Left wing pushes higher taxes on the rich and corporations to spend on government programs and entitlements - how the hell does that help big business?
Left wing also pushes government oversight and regulations like anti-trust, environmental protection and higher minimum wages.

The right pushes in exactly OPPOSITE direction, which is far more 1%ter and big-business friendly.

There are certainly some big spenders on the left, but they do so DIRECTLY OPPOSITE to their personal self interests.

For example: The Patriotic Millionaires - these are people who's cause is to make millionares like themselves pay more taxes to support this country.

Self-interest is sawed into right wing ideology itself, where left wing politics usually revolve about responsibility to the society at large.

Allow me to explain.

Take Warren Buffet. Warren Buffet is a staunch democrat that has supported raising taxes on the rich, which you claimed was 'directly opposite to their personal self interests'.

Right?

Let me ask you a question. If we doubled the top marginal tax rate, to 80% or higher, how much more would Buffet pay in taxes? Do you know what Warren Buffets salary is?

$100,000 a year. Top marginal tax rate is income over $415K. So Warren Buffet would pay $0 more in tax.

So... when Warren Buffet, and thousands of other billionaire left-wing liberals demand higher taxes on the rich... it doesn't affect them. Who does it affect? The people who are trying to get rich. Not the people who are rich.

See? Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

Another example. Warren Buffet invested millions on millions into buying BNSF railroad in 2007. Go look at some of the biggest expenditures of the 2009 'stimulus' package? Money to the railroad Unions, and money for infrastructure projects, most of which was for railroad infrastructure. I know of at least two specific examples of the stimulus money being used in projects that directly and specifically benefited BNSF.

And who pays for those infrastructure projects? Well of course we do. The public. Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

None of these anti-poor, pro-rich views are right-wing. These are all left wing.

Take the minimum wage. A lot of left-wingers were shocked when McDonald's CEO came out in favor of a higher minimum wage, and the $15/hour minimum wage in SF was promoted.

But the moment you hear billionaire executives supporting minimum wage, you should automatically wonder why.

McDonald's is a multi-billion dollar international company. Which companies are going to be able to afford a higher minimum wage? The small indenpendent chaines, or the large mega-corps? Obviously the mega-corps. The small chain stores will go out of business.

Meaning... more customers for McDonald's. But doesn't that mean McDonald's will have to pay more money to employee?

View attachment 109455
See those high paid employees? Nope? Neither do I.

See McDonald's has the money to invest in replacements for employees. McDonald's also knows that poorer, smaller companies do not. So McDonald's knows that the smaller companies will go out of business, while they replace expensive $15/hour workers, with cheap kiosks and automation.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. All those former employees, have to find something else to do... if they can even find a job.

See? The left-wing is the biggest supporters of big business. Not the right-wing.

Another example, you mentioned all that regulation and 'anti-trust'.

But in reality, regulation and anti-trust, is the biggest creators of monopolies.

See, regulation by its very nature, is costly. A rough estimate is that Federal regulations alone, cost over $2 Trillion a year. Now where does that money come from? YOU. You pay the price, in higher costs to consumers. And that's just Federal. There are state and local regulations that cost companies billions every year as well.

More specifically though, which company is more able to pay that price? A big mega-corp? Or a startup? Of course the mega-corp has billions of dollars to meet all those regulations. The smaller companies do not.

So the smaller companies, merge or sell out, or close.... leaving the mega-corps to have customers with fewer options to choose from.

Take net neutrality. Government heaped hundreds of pages of regulations on the broadband internet providers. What do we see today? Altice bought Cablevision. Charter and Time Warner. Verizon Fios was sold to Frontier.

I predicted this, when Net Neutrality was debated. You heap a bunch of regulations, and smaller providers merge with larger providers, resulting in higher prices, and less consumer choice.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. Again, this is not a right-wing policy that is causing this. It's a left-wing policy. You help the rich get richer, and poor get poorer. Not us.

The difference between us, is that the right-wing looks at results, not the stated goals. Your goal doesn't matter. What matters is the results of your actions. The results are, poor people are harmed, and rich people benefit.

You are totally clueless, Buffet rule would tax all income, including capital gains he makes his billions from at a minimum rate.

Buffet will not be spared from Buffet rule.

Warren E Buffett, CEO Compensation - Forbes.com

View attachment 110612
Notice "Total Compensation" What does it say? $0.1 Million.
"5-Year Total Compensation" What does it say? $0.5 Million.

Where do you see "stock gains" "bonus" or "other"? -- (that means zero).

Which means.... zero. See, Buffet is brilliant, in that Berkshire Hathaway doesn't pay dividends at all, which of course would be taxed, at 23%. The Buffet rule would only raise those taxes to 30% anyway.

But it doesn't matter because Buffet doesn't pay ANY dividend taxes at all.

See.... Buffet doesn't need to own the stock in the dozens of companies he's invested into, because he owns Berkshire Hathaway, and Berkshire owns the stock in all those companies.

Any dividends paid by say BNSF, ends up at Berkshire Hathaway. Warren Buffet never sees them. Thus he never pays taxes on them.

So you could raise dividend taxes to 100% if you wanted. You still wouldn't get so much as penny more in taxes, from Warren Buffet.

Again... Taxes only prevent new people from getting wealthy. Not existing wealthy people.

Taxes are ultimately the best pro-wealthy, anti-poor policy you left-wingers ever promote.

There is a swiss-cheese sized hole in your claims - Buffet ALREADY pays 17% tax. If what you say of his income is true, he would pay right about ZERO.

Buffet's proposals would raise this 17% to 30%

 

[Andylusion]

Not true. Simply not true. The left-wing has been in the pockets of big business for decades. Virtually everything the left-wing pushes, is a benefit to big business.

That is an INSANE comment.

Left wing pushes higher taxes on the rich and corporations to spend on government programs and entitlements - how the hell does that help big business?
Left wing also pushes government oversight and regulations like anti-trust, environmental protection and higher minimum wages.

The right pushes in exactly OPPOSITE direction, which is far more 1%ter and big-business friendly.

There are certainly some big spenders on the left, but they do so DIRECTLY OPPOSITE to their personal self interests.

For example: The Patriotic Millionaires - these are people who's cause is to make millionares like themselves pay more taxes to support this country.

Self-interest is sawed into right wing ideology itself, where left wing politics usually revolve about responsibility to the society at large.

Allow me to explain.

Take Warren Buffet. Warren Buffet is a staunch democrat that has supported raising taxes on the rich, which you claimed was 'directly opposite to their personal self interests'.

Right?

Let me ask you a question. If we doubled the top marginal tax rate, to 80% or higher, how much more would Buffet pay in taxes? Do you know what Warren Buffets salary is?

$100,000 a year. Top marginal tax rate is income over $415K. So Warren Buffet would pay $0 more in tax.

So... when Warren Buffet, and thousands of other billionaire left-wing liberals demand higher taxes on the rich... it doesn't affect them. Who does it affect? The people who are trying to get rich. Not the people who are rich.

See? Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

Another example. Warren Buffet invested millions on millions into buying BNSF railroad in 2007. Go look at some of the biggest expenditures of the 2009 'stimulus' package? Money to the railroad Unions, and money for infrastructure projects, most of which was for railroad infrastructure. I know of at least two specific examples of the stimulus money being used in projects that directly and specifically benefited BNSF.

And who pays for those infrastructure projects? Well of course we do. The public. Rich get richer. Poor get poorer.

None of these anti-poor, pro-rich views are right-wing. These are all left wing.

Take the minimum wage. A lot of left-wingers were shocked when McDonald's CEO came out in favor of a higher minimum wage, and the $15/hour minimum wage in SF was promoted.

But the moment you hear billionaire executives supporting minimum wage, you should automatically wonder why.

McDonald's is a multi-billion dollar international company. Which companies are going to be able to afford a higher minimum wage? The small indenpendent chaines, or the large mega-corps? Obviously the mega-corps. The small chain stores will go out of business.

Meaning... more customers for McDonald's. But doesn't that mean McDonald's will have to pay more money to employee?

View attachment 109455
See those high paid employees? Nope? Neither do I.

See McDonald's has the money to invest in replacements for employees. McDonald's also knows that poorer, smaller companies do not. So McDonald's knows that the smaller companies will go out of business, while they replace expensive $15/hour workers, with cheap kiosks and automation.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. All those former employees, have to find something else to do... if they can even find a job.

See? The left-wing is the biggest supporters of big business. Not the right-wing.

Another example, you mentioned all that regulation and 'anti-trust'.

But in reality, regulation and anti-trust, is the biggest creators of monopolies.

See, regulation by its very nature, is costly. A rough estimate is that Federal regulations alone, cost over $2 Trillion a year. Now where does that money come from? YOU. You pay the price, in higher costs to consumers. And that's just Federal. There are state and local regulations that cost companies billions every year as well.

More specifically though, which company is more able to pay that price? A big mega-corp? Or a startup? Of course the mega-corp has billions of dollars to meet all those regulations. The smaller companies do not.

So the smaller companies, merge or sell out, or close.... leaving the mega-corps to have customers with fewer options to choose from.

Take net neutrality. Government heaped hundreds of pages of regulations on the broadband internet providers. What do we see today? Altice bought Cablevision. Charter and Time Warner. Verizon Fios was sold to Frontier.

I predicted this, when Net Neutrality was debated. You heap a bunch of regulations, and smaller providers merge with larger providers, resulting in higher prices, and less consumer choice.

Rich get richer. Poor get poorer. Again, this is not a right-wing policy that is causing this. It's a left-wing policy. You help the rich get richer, and poor get poorer. Not us.

The difference between us, is that the right-wing looks at results, not the stated goals. Your goal doesn't matter. What matters is the results of your actions. The results are, poor people are harmed, and rich people benefit.

You are totally clueless, Buffet rule would tax all income, including capital gains he makes his billions from at a minimum rate.

Buffet will not be spared from Buffet rule.

Warren E Buffett, CEO Compensation - Forbes.com

View attachment 110612
Notice "Total Compensation" What does it say? $0.1 Million.
"5-Year Total Compensation" What does it say? $0.5 Million.

Where do you see "stock gains" "bonus" or "other"? -- (that means zero).

Which means.... zero. See, Buffet is brilliant, in that Berkshire Hathaway doesn't pay dividends at all, which of course would be taxed, at 23%. The Buffet rule would only raise those taxes to 30% anyway.

But it doesn't matter because Buffet doesn't pay ANY dividend taxes at all.

See.... Buffet doesn't need to own the stock in the dozens of companies he's invested into, because he owns Berkshire Hathaway, and Berkshire owns the stock in all those companies.

Any dividends paid by say BNSF, ends up at Berkshire Hathaway. Warren Buffet never sees them. Thus he never pays taxes on them.

So you could raise dividend taxes to 100% if you wanted. You still wouldn't get so much as penny more in taxes, from Warren Buffet.

Again... Taxes only prevent new people from getting wealthy. Not existing wealthy people.

Taxes are ultimately the best pro-wealthy, anti-poor policy you left-wingers ever promote.

There is a swiss-cheese sized hole in your claims - Buffet ALREADY pays 17% tax. If what you say of his income is true, he would pay right about ZERO.

Buffet's proposals would raise this 17% to 30%

No. It would not. Everything I said is not just true, but I proved it with SEC reports.

He pays 17%, on the $100,000 he directly earns. That is his income. That is what he pays.

The buffet proposal would raise his taxes from 17% to 17%. No effect whatsoever.

He doesn't get dividends, because his company doesn't pay him dividends. All taxes raised on long-term capital gains, would cause him to pay.... nothing.

The buffet rule would raise a minimum tax of 30%..... on wages over $1 Million a year. Go read the rule. Buffet doesn't make a salary over a $1 Million a year.

Buffet would not pay one single PENNY more in taxes if they implemented the buffet rule.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

First realize this: it is the right of the people to assemble peacefully and redress their grievances. That right is enshrined in our constitution.

Second: the someone who is responsible for these demonstrations is Donald J. Trump. His divisive rhetoric is responsible. His attitude toward women and other marginalized groups is responsible. His utter lack of respect for women and their capabilities is responsible. Had he taken the high road and honored his fellow Americans rather than further disparaging and marginalizing them would have prevented the justifiable fear many Americans have.

I guess that means all the riots & race protests of the last few years have been Obama's fault eh?

How bout OWS? Obama's fault too?



Stupid simpletons

 

[Nosmo King]

First realize this: it is the right of the people to assemble peacefully and redress their grievances. That right is enshrined in our constitution.

Second: the someone who is responsible for these demonstrations is Donald J. Trump. His divisive rhetoric is responsible. His attitude toward women and other marginalized groups is responsible. His utter lack of respect for women and their capabilities is responsible. Had he taken the high road and honored his fellow Americans rather than further disparaging and marginalizing them would have prevented the justifiable fear many Americans have.

I guess that means all the riots & race protests of the last few years have been Obama's fault eh?

How bout OWS? Obama's fault too?



Stupid simpletons

Obama wasn't in charge of municipal police departments whose officers have been acting irresponsibly. Do you think President Obama's rhetoric encouraged policemen to shoot Black American citizens?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

First realize this: it is the right of the people to assemble peacefully and redress their grievances. That right is enshrined in our constitution.

Second: the someone who is responsible for these demonstrations is Donald J. Trump. His divisive rhetoric is responsible. His attitude toward women and other marginalized groups is responsible. His utter lack of respect for women and their capabilities is responsible. Had he taken the high road and honored his fellow Americans rather than further disparaging and marginalizing them would have prevented the justifiable fear many Americans have.

I guess that means all the riots & race protests of the last few years have been Obama's fault eh?

How bout OWS? Obama's fault too?



Stupid simpletons

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

First realize this: it is the right of the people to assemble peacefully and redress their grievances. That right is enshrined in our constitution.

Second: the someone who is responsible for these demonstrations is Donald J. Trump. His divisive rhetoric is responsible. His attitude toward women and other marginalized groups is responsible. His utter lack of respect for women and their capabilities is responsible. Had he taken the high road and honored his fellow Americans rather than further disparaging and marginalizing them would have prevented the justifiable fear many Americans have.

I guess that means all the riots & race protests of the last few years have been Obama's fault eh?

How bout OWS? Obama's fault too?



Stupid simpletons

Obama wasn't in charge of municipal police departments whose officers have been acting irresponsibly. Do you think President Obama's rhetoric encouraged policemen to shoot Black American citizens?

I think it encouraged the Dumbfucks that got shot as well as the rioters.

 

[rdean]

Why do Republicans love billionaires? We know the GOP leadership is looking for every single way they can fuck over their GOP base. We saw it under Bush and we are seeing it under Trump. What makes them like this? Anyone?

 

[whitehall]

The hypocrisy is stunning. The "womans march" excluded women who were pro-life even though they were liberal and the rioters in Berkeley denied the free speech of a Gay speaker because he was conservative.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Why do Republicans love billionaires? We know the GOP leadership is looking for every single way they can fuck over their GOP base. We saw it under Bush and we are seeing it under Trump. What makes them like this? Anyone?

Why can't hacks, like you, speak without talking points? You NEVER articulate a position on your own, with your own thoughts. Anytime you post without a link it's 100% known leftist talking points.

 

[Nosmo King]

First realize this: it is the right of the people to assemble peacefully and redress their grievances. That right is enshrined in our constitution.

Second: the someone who is responsible for these demonstrations is Donald J. Trump. His divisive rhetoric is responsible. His attitude toward women and other marginalized groups is responsible. His utter lack of respect for women and their capabilities is responsible. Had he taken the high road and honored his fellow Americans rather than further disparaging and marginalizing them would have prevented the justifiable fear many Americans have.

I guess that means all the riots & race protests of the last few years have been Obama's fault eh?

How bout OWS? Obama's fault too?



Stupid simpletons

Obama wasn't in charge of municipal police departments whose officers have been acting irresponsibly. Do you think President Obama's rhetoric encouraged policemen to shoot Black American citizens?

I think it encouraged the Dumbfucks that got shot as well as the rioters.

What's it like to be so obtuse? Black Americans shot by police are 'dumbfucks' and those who protest against the actions of our least responsible President are too?

The view from your vantage point must be ridiculously restrictive.