james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,805
- 170
I did find an anti-CO2 experiment going on by Bill Gates and three oil cos. CO2 help plants thrive and in turn they help us thrive. This could be win-win as it reduces air pollution.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a shameless lie. In fact, you just made it up on the spot.There is no observable data that proves the small amount of global warming attributed to mankind's burning of fossil fuel thus far has altered any weather patterns.
https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/06/extreme-weather-Appendix-A2.pdf
I did find an anti-CO2 experiment going on by Bill Gates and three oil cos. CO2 help plants thrive and in turn they help us thrive. This could be win-win as it reduces air pollution.
I'm asking about the OP's claim that someone is blaming EVERY hurricane, tornado, and forest fire on global warming. Still haven't had anyone give evidence of anyone doing that. Could the OP just be another lying CRC?What about EVERY tornado and forest fire?The NY hurricane in 1938 was so severe it killed hundreds and turned Montauk into an island cut off from the rest of Long Island.
If AGW was "real" shouldn't we have had worse over the subsequent 80 years?
Hmmm?
Forest fires? Really? Can you explain how CO2 sparks forest fires? Was Smokey the Bear wrong?
I did find an anti-CO2 experiment going on by Bill Gates and three oil cos. CO2 help plants thrive and in turn they help us thrive. This could be win-win as it reduces air pollution.
CO2 isn’t air pollution. It’s a vital component of the carbon life cycle that all life depends upon.
I did find an anti-CO2 experiment going on by Bill Gates and three oil cos. CO2 help plants thrive and in turn they help us thrive. This could be win-win as it reduces air pollution.
CO2 isn’t air pollution. It’s a vital component of the carbon life cycle that all life depends upon.
Who ever said CO2 was considered air pollution?
Uh...okay. I guess I'm going to need some clarification on "weather patterns". Are heatv waves not weather patterns? Droughts?. It hasn't reached the point of altering weather patterns yet.
We are in an interglacial cycle. Have been for the past 20,000 plus years or so.That's a shameless lie. In fact, you just made it up on the spot.There is no observable data that proves the small amount of global warming attributed to mankind's burning of fossil fuel thus far has altered any weather patterns.
https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/06/extreme-weather-Appendix-A2.pdf
I didn't say it hasn't shown up by exacerbating extreme events like your link shows. It is showing up in other ways to like the melting of the Glaciers and the Ice caps. It hasn't reached the point of altering weather patterns yet. I'm not saying it wont either.
Maybe gay marriage caused climate change and then. . . . .????Well it’s either climate change or gay marriage that causes natural disasters.
That's a shameless lie. In fact, you just made it up on the spot.There is no observable data that proves the small amount of global warming attributed to mankind's burning of fossil fuel thus far has altered any weather patterns.
https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/06/extreme-weather-Appendix-A2.pdf
No,YOU can't, because you are inventing reasons to stay ignorant. Because, if you learn anything, you will learn you are wrong. Can't have that.You can't really trust anything put out by the MacArthur Foundation, that includes everything you see on PBS and hear on NPR.
List of New York hurricanes - WikipediaHe was referring to New York not having those things....not that they didn't exist. I actually read your link..............did you?
Most people’s problem is believing they can’t be wrong. It’s not that they are so invested in what they believe as it is that they are invested in themselves.No,YOU can't, because you are inventing reasons to stay ignorant. Because, if you learn anything, you will learn you are wrong. Can't have that.You can't really trust anything put out by the MacArthur Foundation, that includes everything you see on PBS and hear on NPR.
No,YOU can't, because you are inventing reasons to stay ignorant. Because, if you learn anything, you will learn you are wrong. Can't have that.You can't really trust anything put out by the MacArthur Foundation, that includes everything you see on PBS and hear on NPR.
Like, climate scientists do?You should do your researc
But they don’t. They don’t start their explanation with past and present climate changes and go from there.Like, climate scientists do?You should do your researc
What a revolutionary idea!
![]()
They, of course, do, and this is a shameless, moronic lie. You are embarrassing yourself, and, if I wanted the idiotic opinion of an uneducated slob on complicated scientific matters, i would ask my dog.But they don’t. They don’t start their explanation with past and present climate changes and go from there.
Can you show me where they have done this?They, of course, do, and this is a shameless, moronic lie. You are embarrassing yourself, and, if I wanted the idiotic opinion of an uneducated slob on complicated scientific matters, i would ask my dog.But they don’t. They don’t start their explanation with past and present climate changes and go from there.
Yep!Can you show me where they have done this?