I've taken you off ignore to see if you can actually have a discussion without sling petty insults. We'll see.
I know a bit. I had to study the Big Three Codexes in school. Sinaiticus, Vaticanus and Alexandricanus. Obviously we also went through the Latin Vulgate, the Wyclyffe Bible (talk about a weird way to get excommunicated!) KJV and so on.
You sling insults, I sling them back, and you cry about it. Stop posting idiotic stuff and no one will call you idiotic.
Actually, I was thinking of Mark 10:42 but i could see where you came up with that. I certainly could have made it clearer. Of course, I sought only discussion whereas it seems you and a few others seek only conflict and excuse to criticize. The evvidence of this would be the fact that you have only contradicted and criticized - which anyone can do.
See what I mean about petty insults?
Tell me something, why would Jesus tell his followers to treat people who say he did not come in the flesh as the greatest among them? He obviously wouldn't, would he?
I do not seek conflict, I just don't hide from it. If you actually sought discussion you wouldn't run away when it is offered. More than once I actually pointed out the fact that the stuff you post is logically null, just like this example is, and you run away because it hurts your head. What am I supposed to do when you are so far wrong it doesn't even make sense, pat you on the head and tell you what a good boy you are?
Don't complain when I contradict and criticize you, it could be worse.
That is your interpretation but let's see if that makes sense. You should love people who are trying to KILL you. Say, Al Qaeda members for instance. But the guy who volunteers with wounded vets and happens to be gay or Democrat or whatever? Him you should hate?
This makes sense to you?
I don't hate anyone, it doesn't line up with the teachings of Christ as I understand them. Therefore, it wouldn't make sense for me to think I should love people I hate.
The day I start hating anyone because they are gay, or even because they are Muslim, feel free to call me on it. Until then, accept the fact that I happen to be right here, loving the people who are trying to do you harm is what Jesus was talking about.
Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Jesus didn't interact with those who weren't worth the time. If you could debate without petty insults, you might be worth paying attnetion to. Previously, you had not once evidenced the ability to do so. The Bible makes it clear there is a time to shake the dust off your feet.
However, you seem intelligent and like you might have ideas worthy of discussion and debate. If you can refrain from including personal attacks every time you post, i am more than happy to see what ideas you come up with.
I bet you can't find a single example of that in the Bible. Not only did he publicly interact with the Scribes and the Pharisees, he even ate with them. (Luke 7:36) He allowed prostitutes and thieves to follow him around, and he took a man he knew would betray him as a disciple.
Like I said before, if you stop throwing around insults every fracking time you post I won't throw them back. Just ask Cenotaph if I can argue a position, and even convince a guy that knows to his core that he is right that he is actually wrong,
The problem here is not me, it is you. I treat your opinions with the contempt they deserve when they deserve and you take it as a personal insult.
I guess you don't understand. Would you say it is easier to forgive someone who has insulted you, if they are a Christian, Conservative American who shares your values, than it is for you to forgive someone who you know is a Muslim, Liberal who has completely different values? Or whatever you might find offensive. If you are honest, you will admit it is easier to forgive some people than others. If you are just concerned about being right, you won't.
Did I say it was easy? I have no reason to forgive gays, or Muslims, unless they try to hurt me, and then I will do it because I know the alternative is worse than anything they can do.
By the way, I don't find ideas or attitudes offensive,I find stupidity offensive.
Show me where I said someone is screwed up specifically because they disagree with any stated views.
Now, there are people who neither agree nor disagree. They just come in slinging petty insults and looking for something to criticize.
But you are wrong. I have not said anyone is screwed up for disagreeing with me. Or you could show where that happened.
Did you read what you were typing when you replied to this post? You think me contradicting and criticizing your point of view is wrong, yet you are now saying that does not mean you think I am screwed up simply because I contradict and criticize you.
Want to try and explain that one?
This time, you not only misunderstand the point, you misinterpret to it's opposite.
I simply referenced "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." So in other words, you wanna point your finger at others, make sure you haven't ever done anything wrong, yourself.
No, you specifically said don't point your finger at people and think your sins are better than theirs.
Still want to know how that stacks up to 1 Cor 6, or is that part of the Bible you discard?
Ah. It begins. Well let's skip it.
Once again, you toss around insults, but when someone points out that you are being self righteous you pretend they are the ones that are crazy.
Not quite sure why you think a verse urging you to dedicate every part of your life to God means go for your goals.
I kinda like this one, "If you add to these words you will get all the plagues in this book."
You realize of course, the Bible you have at home, HAS been added to, subtracted from in a BIG way and altered radically?
Oh wait. That was just a petty jab, wasn't it? [/quote]
You claim you studied the codexes, so you realize, of course, that that quote applies to Revelations, not the Bible.
Or was that just a petty jab?
So that's the substance you have to offer? Basically, you spent the whole thread trying to find things to contradict and ended with a petty jab. How predictable.
I didn't try things to contradict, I pointed out what you got wrong. That is what happens in a debate. One person makes a statement, the other person tries to prove him wrong. The problem here is your idea of a discussion is that everyone should bow to your brilliance because you are so obviously right that only an idiot could disagree with you, which allows you to dismiss anyone who disagrees with you as an idiot.
A bit of circular reasoning there, but I am sure you have no problem rationalizing it. (FYI, that was a jab.)
On the other hand, I have addressed everything you've posted directly - no dodges and without personal insult or attack.
That was funny.
How was your casual dismissal of my entire post as nothing but trying to contradict you not dodging what I am saying?
And I should not have you on ignore because you offer such great contribution and insight? Because it's obvious from your threads you're such a positive person? Honestly, I'm not seeing it. You still seem to be the same contrarian you always were. There are a lot of people here I've actually LEARNED from and exchanged great ideas with. Why interact with people who are always negative?
Well let's see what happens.
Tell me something, how did I manage to convince a gay person that know he did not choose to be gay that the science does not back him up if nothing I post has any insight? Your problem with me is actually rather simple, I am an arrogant prick, just like you, and it annoys you, Not only that, it really annoys you that you do not annoy me back.
Jesus took a whip to the people he saw defiling the Temple, he insulted the religious and political caste of his day, he even disrespected people in their own homes. What, exactly, is your beef with me again? That I don't treat your ideas with respect?