Be still my palpitating heart. Trump dumped on NATO. Can dumping the United Nations be far behind. So how about perking up the campaign season with a topic media mouths will not touch with an antiseptic ten foot pole —— Donald Trump and Ted Cruz getting into a debate that clarifies their positions on continued membership in the United Nations:
Donald Trump outlined an unabashedly noninterventionist approach to world affairs Monday, telling The Washington Post's editorial board that he questions the need for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which has formed the backbone of Western security policies since the Cold War.
President Clinton’s use of NATO in his Balkan Adventure was a disaster. More so because it originated with then-Senator Joe Biden:
The train wreck waiting to happen in the Balkans notwithstanding, there is a possibility NATO will serve a purpose if the right conditions exist. The United Nations never served any useful purpose for the American people nor will it in the future.
If you are one of those few Americans who still believes the UN is a force for good, list every major crisis since 1945 in two columns —— domestic and foreign. Begin with either column and resolve each crisis as though the United Nations never existed. I think you will be stunned by the similarities at how easily every crisis could have been resolved had what is best for the United Nations NOT interfered in every decision. Many crises never would have materialized had the United Nations never existed. It gets worse when you see how each crisis became more complicated for the American people as the years went by.
Should you not want to do my lists, at least do Illegal aliens pouring through open-borders and economic refugees. Note that they are two major crises not one. Both were engineered by New World Order thinking. Both crises are approaching the unsolvable stage from the perspective of the American people. Both were set in motion to force the American people into accepting, and paying for, every immigrant and refugee as the status quo. In short: They became essential components in a well-designed incremental blueprint for giving the United Nations the authority to administer a global government.
In an attempt to strengthen my case against the United Nations, I will close with a self-explanatory excerpt that I posted dozens of times over the years. The only question is determining when the blueprint was drawn. Was it drawn the year the failed League of Nations was created in 1920? Was it drawn by the United Nations in 1945? Or was it drawn by bankers and press barons in the early 1950s? There is proof for all three, but I lean toward 1920.
Donald Trump outlined an unabashedly noninterventionist approach to world affairs Monday, telling The Washington Post's editorial board that he questions the need for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which has formed the backbone of Western security policies since the Cold War.
Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy
By Philip Rucker and Robert Costa
March 21 at 4:30 PM
Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy
By Philip Rucker and Robert Costa
March 21 at 4:30 PM
Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy
President Clinton’s use of NATO in his Balkan Adventure was a disaster. More so because it originated with then-Senator Joe Biden:
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Biden said that he was the catalyst to change the circumstance in Bosnia led by President Clinton. True, or untrue, he was claiming he was the guy who told Bill Clinton what to do in Bosnia. If true, Biden told Clinton to use NATO forces to bomb Christians. I recall the Luftwaffe took part in the bombings. Wherever he is Reichsmarschall Goring must have smiled when the first bomb fell from a Luftwaffe bomber.
Incidentally, Biden later watered down his catalyst comment. I assume Clinton wanted full credit for his Balkan Adventures.
The mouth that never stops regurgitating was trying to show that Sarah Palin lacked foreign policy experience. He was right in one sense. Sarah did not have Biden’s unblemished record of always being wrong about foreign policy.
The Return of Ethnic Cleansing
The mouth that never stops regurgitating was trying to show that Sarah Palin lacked foreign policy experience. He was right in one sense. Sarah did not have Biden’s unblemished record of always being wrong about foreign policy.
The Return of Ethnic Cleansing
The train wreck waiting to happen in the Balkans notwithstanding, there is a possibility NATO will serve a purpose if the right conditions exist. The United Nations never served any useful purpose for the American people nor will it in the future.
If you are one of those few Americans who still believes the UN is a force for good, list every major crisis since 1945 in two columns —— domestic and foreign. Begin with either column and resolve each crisis as though the United Nations never existed. I think you will be stunned by the similarities at how easily every crisis could have been resolved had what is best for the United Nations NOT interfered in every decision. Many crises never would have materialized had the United Nations never existed. It gets worse when you see how each crisis became more complicated for the American people as the years went by.
Should you not want to do my lists, at least do Illegal aliens pouring through open-borders and economic refugees. Note that they are two major crises not one. Both were engineered by New World Order thinking. Both crises are approaching the unsolvable stage from the perspective of the American people. Both were set in motion to force the American people into accepting, and paying for, every immigrant and refugee as the status quo. In short: They became essential components in a well-designed incremental blueprint for giving the United Nations the authority to administer a global government.
In an attempt to strengthen my case against the United Nations, I will close with a self-explanatory excerpt that I posted dozens of times over the years. The only question is determining when the blueprint was drawn. Was it drawn the year the failed League of Nations was created in 1920? Was it drawn by the United Nations in 1945? Or was it drawn by bankers and press barons in the early 1950s? There is proof for all three, but I lean toward 1920.
David Rockefeller's 1991 Bilderberg
Quote...Ten Years Later
11-21-1
Quote...Ten Years Later
11-21-1
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years."
He went on to explain:
"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."
-- David Rockefeller, Speaking at the June, 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton and by Dan Quayle
David Rockefeller's 1991 Bilderberg Quote...Ten Years Later
David Rockefeller's 1991 Bilderberg Quote...Ten Years Later
Last edited:
