Billy Bob, in the WUWT article, why do all the solar data graphs run from 1965 to present but the Southern Hemisphere temperature data, which they imply is correlated, only run for eight months of 2020? Perhaps cause over the same period as his solar data, the global temps look like this:
View attachment 483855
Where is the data to support that?
Most of this Environmental wacko data have been fabricated and and don't mean jackshit. We have documented proof that the Principle Climate Scientists, NASA, NOAA and the UN purposely lied, fabricated and cherry picked data.
If this shit was real then there would have been no need to lie so much about it, would there?
How much is man made and not from the natural post glacial warming that we have been experiencing for the last 10K years?
When are you stupid uneducated Moon Bats ever going to pull your heads out of your ass and learn that this AGW vullshit is nothing more than a scam?
You Libtard freaks don't know any more about Climate Science than you know about Economics, History, Biology, Ethics or the Constitution.
If you had simply used the provided link you would have instantly seen " Source data NOAA-NCDC State of the Climate: Global Analysis [Web + data download] ". These data have NOT been fabricated. You do NOT have documented proof that anyone at NASA, NOAA or the UN purposely lied, fabricated or cherry-picked data. Here is temperature data for the last 10,000 years. Tell us you see nothing different between the overall trend and the trend over the last century or so at the far right side of the graph.
View attachment 485594
Global warming reaches 1°C above preindustrial, warmest in more than…
Global mean warming reached 1°C above preindustrial for the first time. It is a signal from the climate system that time is running out if we are to be able to reduce emissions fast enough so as to hold warming below 2°C, and ultimately below 1.5°C by 2100.climateanalytics.org
This the type of shit I was talking about.
'"Data from the UK Met Office".
Where in the hell did they get their data and how much of it was fabricated or cherry picked by the Climate Scientists that admitted in the Climategate emails that they lied?
The UK Met is like our NOAA that have been caught time and again yielding to Libtard Environmental Wacko pressure to make up AGW shit. The dishonesty is despicable. Just like our NOAA they are good at predicting weather but have lost their credibility when it comes to climate.
This is the reason why I don't discuss AGW with the Environmental Wackos anymore. Just like you just did they post articles from sources that have been proven to be false like it was fact. Then I have to spend a considerable amount of time to track down the falsification and then the stupid Moon Bats will ignore the facts that I present. I have done it a lot in the past but don't bother anymore.
AGW is not fact based. It is a religion for stupid uneducated Moon Bats that just don't have the capacity to think for themselves. Like the man said "there is a sucker born every minute". You have been suckered into the scam.
You need to pull your head out of you Moon Bat ass. The global warming that is happening nowadays is natural post glacial warming and the contribution by humans is minimal. All the real data shows it. In fact many of the Environmental Wackos will admit it if cornered.
My gas guzzling Tundra pick up truck is not going to kill you.
You have a serious misunderstanding as to what does and does not constitute a reliable source of scientific information. Are you familiar with peer review and refereed publication?
