the other mike
Diamond Member
Especially in the Sahara desert.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. No. You're supposed to say;Better energy source than doughnuts ... that's insanity talking, you must be nuts ... ha ha ha ha ...
What are we to do with all this energy in the desert? ... wouldn't it be better to put solar panels near, or on, our homes and businesses? ... not sure we can put up terrorist-proof transmission lines through a thousand miles of ISIS controlled territory ... better to put small nuclear reactors in every neighborhood of Gaza City I would think ...
Especially in the Sahara desert.
Save the nukes for space travel.Nope, but you already know nuclear power is by far, our best source of energy.
Save the nukes for space travel.Nope, but you already know nuclear power is by far, our best source of energy.
China has 4 times more people than we do, and half their country isn't suitable for solar power.
By far nuclear power is the most reliable, efficient, and cleanest form of energy we have today. China has more being built and in planning than the rest of the world combined.
They also always forget to mention that even at the current pace, we'll run out of uranium in about 200 years.Good to see the anti nuclear brigade cheering the harnessing of solar power, you know, from that enormous nuclear reactor in space that we orbit.
Here's an article on uranium reserves -They also always forget to mention that even at the current pace, we'll run out of uranium in about 200 years.Good to see the anti nuclear brigade cheering the harnessing of solar power, you know, from that enormous nuclear reactor in space that we orbit.
How cost-effective will it be for future generations to have to
maintain these dead reactors to prevent meltdowns ?
They also always forget to mention that even at the current pace, we'll run out of uranium in about 200 years.Good to see the anti nuclear brigade cheering the harnessing of solar power, you know, from that enormous nuclear reactor in space that we orbit.
How cost-effective will it be for future generations to have to
maintain these dead reactors to prevent meltdowns ?
Electric vehicles were an idea, but a poor idea. It's like inventing the steam powered car, that's the similarity to where they fit in. Some technology desperately needs invented to supercede electric before every vehicle manufacturing idiots goes down the electric route.Like no one saw this coming...
![]()
Report: Philadelphia's Proterra Fleet in Complete Shambles
More than two dozen electric Proterra buses first unveiled by the city of Philadelphia in 2016 are already out of operation, according to a WHYY investigation.freebeacon.com
China has 4 times more people than we do, and half their country isn't suitable for solar power.
As for nuclear being clean, you're lying. Shut up.
You've got a point.![]()
Why so rude to me? Are you that desperate?
![]()
You've got a point.
Guess I owe you an apology then.
China has a short-term strategy that's part of a larger long-term strategy.Thank you. Here too are the number of nuclear plants scheduled to be built. Notice NONE in the United States.
![]()
China is no fool. They learned from us that one of the secrets to a booming economy is cheap, plentiful energy. As you can see, they are making huge strides toward that end while the Harris/Biden administration is working hard to make our energy both expensive and in short supply.